Acta Biotheoretica

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 391–409 | Cite as

Homologies in the fossil record: The middle ear as a test case

  • J. A. Clack

Abstract

This paper examines the middle ear of fossil living animals in terms of the homologies which have been drawn between its parts in different vertebrate groups. Seven homologies are considered: 1, the middle ear cavity/spiracular pouch; 2, the stapes/hyomandibula; 3, the stapedial/hyomandibular processes; 4 the tympanic membrane; 5, the otic notch; 6, the fenestra ovalis; 7, and the stapedial/hyomandibular foramen. The reasons leading to assessments of homology are reviewed. Homologies 1 and 2, based largely on embryological evidence, are fairly robust, though there are arguments about the details. Homologies 3, 4 and 5 stem from ideas about early tetrapod evolution, and were influenced by contingent factors including the order and time of discovery of early fossil taxa, and perceptions of their phylogeny which resulted from this. They were also influenced by ideas of the evolution of terrestriality among tetrapods. Most of the conceptions have been overturned in recent years by new fossil discoveries and new ways of looking at old data. Homology 6 has been little considered. One possible hypothesis, placed in a strictly ‘archetypal’ theoretical framework has been ignored but deserves consideration on other grounds. Homology 7 depends on how tetrapods are characterised, not a question which has posed difficulties until recently, but which is likely to with the discovery of intermediate fossil forms.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahlberg, P.E. (1991a). A re-examination of sarcopterygian interrelationships, with special reference to the Porolepiformes. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society of London 103: 241–287.Google Scholar
  2. Ahlberg, P.E. (1991b). Tetrapod or near-tetrapod fossils from the Upper Devonian of Scotland. Nature 354: 298–301.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, R.M. (1981). The Chordates. 2nd Edition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beer, G.R. de (1930) The development of the skull ofScyillium (Scyliorhinus) canicula L. Quarterly Journal of the Microscopical Society 74: 591–645.Google Scholar
  5. Beer, G.R. de (1937). The Development of the Vertebrate Skull. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bolt, J.R. and R.E. Lombard (1992). The nature and quality of the fossil evidence of otic evolution in early tetrapods. In: D. Webster, R.R. Fay and A.N. Popper, eds., The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing, pp. 377–404. New York, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. Bolt, J.R. and J.A. Moy-Thomas (1935). On the skull of Holocephali. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 224; 287–312.Google Scholar
  8. Carroll, R.L. (1980). The hyomandibular as a supporting element in the skull of primitive tetrapods. In: A.L. Panchen, ed., The Terrestrial Environment and the Origin of Land Vertebrates, pp. 293–318. Systematics Association Special Volume 15. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clack, J.A. (1983). The stapes of the Coal Measures embolomerePholiderpeton scutigerum Huxley (Amphibia: Anthracosauria) and otic evolution in early tetrapods. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society of London 79: 121–148.Google Scholar
  10. Clack, J.A. (1987).Pholiderpeton scutigerum Huxley, an amphibian from the Yorkshire coal measures. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 318: 1–107.Google Scholar
  11. Clack, J.A. (1988). New material of the early tetrapodAcanthostega from the Upper Devonian of East Greenland. Palaeontology 31: 699–724.Google Scholar
  12. Clack, J.A. (1989). Discovery of the earliest tetrapod stapes. Nature 3432: 425–430.Google Scholar
  13. Clack, J.A. (1992). The stapes ofAcanthostega gunnari and the role of the stapes in early tetrapods. In: D. Webster, R.R. Fay and A.N. Popper, eds., The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing, pp. 405–420. New York, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. Clack, J.A. and R. Holmes (1988). The braincase of the anthracosaurArcheria crassidisca, with comments on the interrelationships of primitive tetrapods. Palaeontology 31: 85–107.Google Scholar
  15. Coates, M.I. and J.A. Clack (1990). Polydactyly in the earliest known tetrapods. Nature 347: 66–69.Google Scholar
  16. Coates, M.I. and J.A. Clack (1991). Fish-like gills and breathing in the earliest known tetrapod. Nature 352: 234–236.Google Scholar
  17. Colbert, E.H. (1980). Evolution of the Vertebrates. New York, John Wiley and Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Eaton, T.H. (1939). The crossopterygian hyomandibular and the tetrapod stapes. Journal of the Washington Academy of Science 29: 109–117.Google Scholar
  19. Fox, H. (1901). Development of the tympano-eustachian passage and associated structures in the common toad. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 53: 223–260.Google Scholar
  20. Fritzsch, B. (1990). Evolution of tetrapod hearing. Scientific Correspondence. Nature 344: 116.Google Scholar
  21. Gaffney, E.S. (1979). Tetrapod monophyly: a phylogenetic analysis. Bulletin of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History 13: 92–105.Google Scholar
  22. Gardiner, B.G. (1984). The relationship of the palaeoniscid fishes, a review based on new specimens ofMimia andMoythomasia from the Upper Devonian of Western Australia. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Geology 37: 173–428.Google Scholar
  23. Goodrich, E.S. (1916). The chorda tympani and middle ear in reptiles, birds and mammals. Quarterly Journal of the Microscopical Society 61: 137–160.Google Scholar
  24. Goodrich, E.S. (1930) Studies on the Structure and Development of the Vertebrates. 1958 edition, Volume 1. New York, Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Gottfried, M.D. and B. Foreman (1990). Evolution of tetrapod hearing. Scientific Correspondence. Nature 344: 116.Google Scholar
  26. Heaton, M.J. (1979). Cranial anatomy of primitive captorhinid reptiles from the late Pennsylvanian and early Permian of Oklahoma and Texas. Bulletin of the Oklahoma Geological Survey 127: 1–84.Google Scholar
  27. Hildebrand, M. (1982). Analysis of Vertebrate Structure. 2nd Edition. New York, John Wiley and Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  28. Holmes, R. (1984). The Carboniferous amphibianProterogyrinus scheeli Romer and the early evolution of tetrapods. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 306: 431–527.Google Scholar
  29. Holmes, R. (1989). The skull and axial skeleton of the Lower Permian anthracosauroid amphibianArcheria crassidisca Cope. Palaeontographica A 207: 161–206.Google Scholar
  30. Huxley, T.H. (1876). Contributions to morphology. Ichthyopsida No. 1. OnCeratodus forsteri, with observations of the classification of fishes. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1876: 24–59.Google Scholar
  31. Jarvik, E. (1972). Middle and Upper Devonian porolepiformes from East Greenland with special reference toGlyptolepis groenlandica n.sp. Meddelelser om Grønland 187: 1–295.Google Scholar
  32. Jarvik, E. (1980). Basic Structure and Evolution of Vertebrates. (2 volumes). London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lombard, R.E. and J.R. Bolt (1979). Evolution of the tetrapod ear: an overview and reinterpretation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society of London 11: 19–76.Google Scholar
  34. deMar, R. (1968). The Permian labyrinthodont amphibianDissorophus multicinctus, and adaptations and phylogeny of the family Dissorophidae. Journal of Palaeontology 42: 1210–1242.Google Scholar
  35. Milner, A.R. (1988). The relationships and origin of living amphibians. In: M.J. Benton, ed., The Phylogeny and Classification of Tetrapods. Volume 1, Amphibians, Reptiles and Birds, pp 95–102. Systematics Association Special Volume 35A. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  36. Milner, A.R., T.R. Smithson, A.C. Milner, M.I. Coates and W.D.I. Rolfe (1986). The search for early tetrapods. Modern Geology 10: 1–28.Google Scholar
  37. Patterson, C. (1982). Morphological characters and homology. In: K.A. Joysey and A.E. Friday, eds., Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction, pp. 21–74. Systematics Association Special Volume 21, London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  38. Panchen, A.L. (1985). On the amphibianCrassigyrinus scoticus Watson from Carboniferous of Scotland. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 309: 461–568.Google Scholar
  39. Panchen, A.L. (1992). Classification, Evolution and the Nature of Biology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Panchen, A.L. and T.R. Smithson (1987). Character diagnosis, fossils and the origin of tetrapods. Biological Reviews 62: 341–438.Google Scholar
  41. Panchen, A.L. and T.R. Smithson (1988). The relationships of the earliest tetrapods. In: M.J. Benton, ed., The Phylogeny and Classification of Tetrapods. Volume 1, Amphibians, Reptiles and Birds, pp. 1–32. Systematics Association Special Volume 35A. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  42. Romer, A.S. (1933). Man and the Vertebrates. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Romer, A.S. (1981). The Vertebrate Story. London, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Romer, A.S. (1962). The Vertebrate Body. 3rd Edition. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders Co.Google Scholar
  45. Romer, A.S. (1966). Vertebrate Paleontology. 3rd. Edition. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Romer, A.S. and T.S. Parsons (1977). The Vertebrate Body. 5th Edition. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders Co.Google Scholar
  47. Sawin, H.J. (1941) The cranial anatomy ofEryops megacephalus. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Anatomy, Harvard College 88: 405–465.Google Scholar
  48. Schultze, H.-P. (1987). Dipnoans as sarcopterygians. In: W.E. Bemis, W.W. Burrgren and N.E. Kemp, eds. The Biology and Evolution of Lungfishes, pp. 39–74. Journal of Morphology. Supplement 1.Google Scholar
  49. Shiskin, M. (1975). Labyrinthodont middle ear and some problems of vertebrate evolution. Problèmes Actuels de Paléonthologie — Évolution des Vertébrés. Colloque Internationale CNRS 218: 337–348.Google Scholar
  50. Smithson, T.R. (1982). The cranial morphology ofGreererpeton burkemorani Romer (Amphibia: Temnospondyli). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society of London 76: 29–90.Google Scholar
  51. Smithson, T.R. and K.S. Thomson (1982). The hyomandibular ofEusthenopteron foordi Whiteaves (Pisces: Crossopterygii) and the early evolution of the tetrapods stapes. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society of London 74: 93–103.Google Scholar
  52. Stahl, B. (1974). Vertebrate History: Problems in Evolution. McGraw Hill Inc.Google Scholar
  53. Thomson, K.S. (1966). The evolution of the tetrapod middle ear and the rhipidistian/amphibian transition. American Zoologist 6: 379–397.Google Scholar
  54. Thomson, K.S. (1991). Where did tetrapods come from? American Scientist 79: 488–490.Google Scholar
  55. Torrey, T.W. and A. Feduccia (1979). Morphogenesis of the Vertebrates. 4th Edition. John Wiley and sons.Google Scholar
  56. Trueb, L. and R. Cloutier (1991). A phylogenetic investigation of the inter- and intrarelationships of the Lissamphibia (Amphibia: Temnospondyli). In: H.-P. Schultze and L. Trueb, eds., Origins of the Higher Groups of Tetrapods, pp. 223–316. Ithaca, NY, Comstock Publishing Associates.Google Scholar
  57. Tumarkin, A. (1949). On the evolution of auditory conducting apparatus. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 63: 119–140 and 193–216.Google Scholar
  58. Wake, M.H. (1979). Hyman's Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy. 3rd Edition. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  59. Watson, D.M.S. (1917). A sketch classification of pre-Jurassic tetrapod vertebrates. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1917: 167–186.Google Scholar
  60. Watson, D.M.S. (1951). Palaeontology and Modern Biology. New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Watson, D.M.S. (1956). The brachyopid labyrinthodonts. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Geology 2: 318–391.Google Scholar
  62. Wever, E.G. (1978). The Reptile Ear. Princeton, University of Princeton Press.Google Scholar
  63. White, T.E. (1939). Osteology ofSeymouria baylorensis Broili. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard College 85: 325–409.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. A. Clack
    • 1
  1. 1.University Museum of ZoologyCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations