Advertisement

Child Psychiatry and Human Development

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 77–86 | Cite as

Mother-child relations and the development of empathy: A short-term longitudinal study

  • Michael Siegal
Articles

Abstract

Ninety-four first graders were given measures of parental identification, gender consistency, and empathy early in the school year and six months later. The results suggest that the capacity for empathy in children is related to identification with their mothers.

Keywords

Longitudinal Study Social Psychology Parental Identification 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Eisenberg N, Lennon R: Sex differences in empathy and related capacities.Psychological Bulletin, 94: 100–131, 1983.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoffman M L: Sex differences in moral internalization and values.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32: 720–729, 1975.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chodorow N:The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gilligan C:In a different voice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kohlberg L: A cognitive-developmental analysis of children's sex-role concepts and attitudes. In E E Maccoby (Ed.),The development of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 82–172, 1966.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kohlberg L: Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In DA Goslin (Ed.),Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 347–479, 1969.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lamb M E, Thompson R A, Gardner W P, Charnov E L, Estes D: Security of infantile attachment as assessed in the “strange situation”: Its study and biological interpretation.The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7: 127–147, 1984.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goodnow J J: Change and variation in ideas about childhood and parenting. In IE Sigel (Ed.),Parental belief systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, in press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Slaby R G, Frey K S: Development of gender constancy and selective attention to same-sex models.Child Development, 46: 849–856, 1975.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smetana J G, Letourneau K J: Development of gender constancy and children's sextyped free play behavior.Developmental Psychology, 20: 691–696, 1984.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoffman M L, Saltzstein H D: Parent discipline and the child's moral development.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5: 45–57, 1967.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoffman M L: Identification and conscience development.Child Development, 42: 1071–1082, 1971.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Siegal M, Francis R: Parent-child relations and cognitive approaches to the development of moral judgment and behaviour.British Journal of Psychology, 73: 285–294, 1982.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bryant B K: An index of empathy for children and adolescents.Child Development, 53: 413–425, 1982.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lunney GH: Using analysis of variance with a dichotomous dependent variable: An empirical study.Journal of Educational Measurement, 7: 263–269, 1970.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maccoby E E, Snow M E, Jacklin C N: Children's dispositions and mother-child interaction at 2 and 18 months: A short-term longitudinal study.Developmental Psychology, 20: 459–472, 1984.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Denenberg V H: Stranger in a strange situation.The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7: 150–152, 1984.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wohlwill J F:The study of behavioral development. New York: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Siegal M: Social cognition and the development of rule-guided behaviour.Australian Journal of Psychology, 36: 387–398, 1984.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Winocur S, Siegal M: Adolescents' judgments of economic arrangements.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 5: 357–365, 1982.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Block J H: Differential premises arising from differnetial socialization of the sexes: Some conjectures.Child Development, 54: 1335–1354, 1983.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lynn D B: Sex role and parental identification.Child Development, 33: 555–564, 1962.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johnson S M, Bolstad O P: Methodological issues in naturalistic observation: Some problems and solutions for field research. In LA Hamerlynck, LC Hardy and EJ Mash (Eds.),Behavior change: Methodology, concepts and practice. Champaign, Illinois, Research Press, 7–67, 1973.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yarrow M R, Waxler C Z: The analysis of social interactions. In R.B. Cairns (Ed.),The analysis of social interactions: Methods, issues, and illustrations. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 37–65, 1979.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    McGuire W J, McGuire C V: Significant others in self-space: Sex differences and developmental trends in the social self. In J Suls (Ed.),Psychological perspectives on the self, Vol. 1, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 71–96, 1982.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Siegal M, Cowen J: Appraisals of intervention: The mother's versus the culprit's behavior as determinants of children's evaluations of discipline techniques.Child Development, 55: 1760–1766, 1984.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Siegal M, Barclay, MS: Children's evaluations of father's socialization behavior.Developmental Psychology, in press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Siegal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of QueenslandSt. LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations