Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 159–165 | Cite as

The impact of prior firm financial performance on subsequent corporate reputation

  • Sue Annis Hammond
  • John W. SlocumJr.
Article

Abstract

This study links corporate reputation, as measured byFortune magazine's Most Admired list, with firm financial performance. Seven measures of financial risk and return were collected for a sample of 149 firms from two time periods, 1981 and 1986. The mean score of four attributes from the 1993Fortune Most Admired list for the sample was then analyzed with the financial data through regression analysis. Two financial variables, Standard Deviation of the Market Return of the Firm and Return on Sales, explained between 0.12 and 0.14 of subsequent reputation. The implication for management is that they can affect a firm's subsequent reputation by lowering financial risk and controlling costs.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, W. F. and R. J. Monsen: 1979, ‘On the Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: Self-Reported Disclosures as a Method of Measuring Corporate Social Involvement’,Academy of Management Journal 22(3), 501–515.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, G. J. and R. A. Buchholz: 1978, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance’,Academy of Management Journal 21(3), 479–486.Google Scholar
  3. Arlow, P. and M. J. Gannon: 1982, ‘Social Responsiveness, Corporate Structure, and Economic Performance’,Academy of Management Review 7(2), 235–241.Google Scholar
  4. Aupperle, K. E., A. B. Carroll and J. D. Hatfield: 1985, ‘An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability’,Academy of Management Journal 28(2), 446–463.Google Scholar
  5. Bowman, E. H. and M. Haire: 1975, ‘A Strategic Posture Toward Corporate Social Responsibility’,California Management Review 17(2), 49–58.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, A. B.: 1979, ‘A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance’,Academy of Management Review 4(4), 497–505.Google Scholar
  7. Chakravarthy, B.: 1986, ‘Measuring Strategic Performance’,Strategic Management Journal 7, 437–458.Google Scholar
  8. Cochran, P. L. and R. A. Wood: 1984, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance’,Academy of Management Journal 27 (1), 42–56.Google Scholar
  9. Cornell, B. and A. Shapiro: 1987, ‘Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance’,Financial Management 16, 5–14.Google Scholar
  10. Cyert, R. M. and J. G. March: 1963,A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  11. Fombrun, C. and M. Shanley: 1990, ‘What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy’,Academy of Management Journal 33(1), 233–258.Google Scholar
  12. Fortune February 1992, 40–72. ‘America's Most Admired Corporations’.Google Scholar
  13. Fortune February 1993, 44–80. ‘America's Most Admired Corporations’.Google Scholar
  14. Fryxell, G. E. and J. Wang: 1994, ‘The Fortune Corporation ‘Reputation’ Index: Reputation for What?’,Journal of Management 20(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  15. Gatewood, R. D., M. A. Gowan and G. J. Lautenschlager: 1993, ‘Corporate Image, Recruitment Image, and Initial Job Choice Decisions’,Academy of Management Journal 36(2), 414–427.Google Scholar
  16. McGuire, J. B., A. Sundgren and T. Schneeweis: 1988, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance’,Academy of Management Journal 31(4), 854–872.Google Scholar
  17. Miles. R. H.: 1987,Managing the Corporate Social Environment: A grounded theory (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  18. Parket, R. and H. Eibert: 1975, ‘Social Responsibility: The Underlying Factors’,Business Horizons 18, 5–10.Google Scholar
  19. Sethi, S. P.: 1975, ‘Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework’,California Management Review 17(3), 58–64.Google Scholar
  20. Sonnenfeld, J. A.: 1981,Corporate Views of the Public Interest (Auburn House Publishing Company, Boston, MA).Google Scholar
  21. Spicer, B. H.: 1978a, ‘Accounting for Corporate Social Performance: Some Problems and Issues’,Journal of Contemporary Business 7, 151–170.Google Scholar
  22. Spicer, B. H.: 1978b, ‘Investors, Corporate Social Performance and Information Disclosure: An Empirical Study’,The Accounting Review 53(1), 94–111.Google Scholar
  23. Sturdivant, F. D. and J. L. Ginter: 1977, ‘Corporate Social Responsiveness: Management Attitudes and Economic Performance’,California Management Review 19(3), 30–39.Google Scholar
  24. Ullmann, A. A.: 1985, ‘Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms’,Academy of Management Review,10(3), 540–557.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sue Annis Hammond
    • 1
  • John W. SlocumJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Kodiak ConsultingDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations