Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 15, Issue 9, pp 927–940 | Cite as

An empirical study of ethical predispositions

  • F. Neil Brady
  • Gloria E. Wheeler
Article

Abstract

Using a two-part instrument consisting of eight vignettes and twenty character traits, the study sampled 141 employees of a mid-west financial firm regarding their predispositions to prefer utilitarian or formalist forms of ethical reasoning. In contrast with earlier studies, we found that these respondents did not prefer utilitarian reasoning. Several other hypotheses were tested involving the relationship between (1) people's preferences for certain types of solutions to issues and (2) the forms of reasoning they use to arrive at those solutions; the nature of the relationship between utilitarian and formalist categories; and the possibility of measuring ethical predispositions using different methods.

Keywords

Economic Growth Empirical Study Character Trait Ethical Reasoning Ethical Predisposition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boal, K. B. and N. Peery: 1985, ‘The Cognitive Structure of Corporate Social Responsibility’,Journal of Management 11(3), 71–82.Google Scholar
  2. Bommer, M., C. Cratto, J. Gravander and M. Tuttle: 1987, ‘A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making’,Journal of Business Ethics 6(4), 265–280.Google Scholar
  3. Brady, F. N.: 1985, ‘A Janus-Headed Model of Ethical Theory: Looking Two Ways at Business/Society Issues’,The Academy of Management Review 10(3), 568–576.Google Scholar
  4. Cavanagh, G. F., D. J. Moberg and M. Velasquez: 1981, ‘The Ethics of Organizational Politics’,Academy of Management Review 10(4), 363–374.Google Scholar
  5. Cherrington, D. J. and J. O. Cherrington: ‘Honesty vs Expediency: The Ethics of Business Leaders’, (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
  6. Ferrell, O. C. and L. G. Gresham: 1985, ‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’,Journal of Marketing 49, 87–96.Google Scholar
  7. Finnis, J.: 1983,Fundamentals of Ethics (Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.).Google Scholar
  8. Forsyth, D. R.: 1980, ‘A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 175–184.Google Scholar
  9. Fritzsche, D. J. and H. Becker: 1984, ‘Linking Management Behavior to Ethical Philosophy — An Empirical Investigation’,Academy of Management Journal 27, 166–175.Google Scholar
  10. Hogan, R.: 1970, ‘A Dimension of Moral Judgment’,Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 35, 205–212.Google Scholar
  11. Hunt, S. D. and S. Vitell: 1986, ‘A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’,Journal of Macromarketing (Spring), 5–16.Google Scholar
  12. Kohlberg, L.: 1969, ‘Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-developmental Approach to Socialization’, in D. A. Goslin, (ed.),Handbook of Socialization: Theory and Research (Rand-McNally, Chicago), pp. 347–480.Google Scholar
  13. McDonald, R. A. and S. A. Morris: 1993, ‘Refining Brady's (1990) Utilitarian/Formalist Aptitude Scale’, presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, March 21, 1993, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  14. Nozick, R.: 1981,Philosophical Explanations (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  15. Pastin, M.: 1986,The Hard Problems of Management: Gaining the Ethics Edge (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  16. Rest, J. R.: 1979,Revised Manual for the Defining Issues Test: An Objective Test of Moral Judgement Development (Minnesota Moral Research Project, Minneapolis, MN).Google Scholar
  17. Stead, W. E., D. C. Worrell and J. G. Stead: 1990, ‘An Integrative Model for Understanding and Managing Ethical Behavior in Business Organizations’,Journal of Business Ethics 9(3), 233–242.Google Scholar
  18. Trevino, L.: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model’,Journal of Management Review 11(3), 601–617.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Neil Brady
    • 1
  • Gloria E. Wheeler
    • 1
  1. 1.Brigham Young UniversityProvoUSA

Personalised recommendations