Observations of fluxes over heterogeneous surfaces
- 127 Downloads
- 44 Citations
Abstract
This study analyzes data collected from repeated aircraft runs 30 m over alternating regions of irrigated and dry nonirrigated surfaces, each region on the order of 10 km across, during the California Ozone Deposition Experiment (CODE). After studying the scale dependence of the flow, the variables and their fluxes are decomposed into means for sublegs defined in terms of irrigated and nonirrigated regions and deviations from such subleg means. Since the repeated runs were flown over the same track, compositing the eight flight legs for each of the two days allows partial isolation of the influences of surface heterogeneity and transient mesoscale motions.
A variance analysis is carried out to quantify the relative importance of surface heterogeneity and transient mesoscale motions on the variability of the turbulence fluxes. The momentum and ozone fluxes are more influenced by transient mesoscale motions while fluxes of heat, moisture and carbon dioxide are more influenced by surface heterogeneity. The momentum field is also influenced by a quasi-stationary mesoscale front and larger scale velocity gradients.
For the present case, the mesoscale modulation of the turbulent flux is numerically more important than the direct mesoscale flux. This spatial modulation of the turbulent fluxes leads to extra Reynolds terms which act to reduce the area-averaged turbulent momentum flux and enhance the area-averaged turbulent heat flux.
Keywords
Heat Flux Momentum Flux Surface Heterogeneity Spatial Modulation Scale DependencePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- André, J. C., Bougeault, P., Mafouf, J.-F., Mascart, P., Noilhan, J. and Pinty, J.-P.: 1989, ‘Impact of Forests on Mesoscale Meteorology’,Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B324, 407–422.Google Scholar
- Avissar, R. and Pielke, R. A.: 1989, ‘A Parameterization of Heterogeneous Land Surfaces for Atmospheric Numerical Models and its Impact on Regional Meteorology’,Mon. Wea. Rev. 117, 2113–2136.Google Scholar
- Bache, D. H. and Unsworth, M. H.: 1977, ‘Some Aerodynamic Features of a Cotton Canopy’,Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 103, 121–134.Google Scholar
- Betts, A. K., Desjardins, R. L., Macpherson, J. I. and Kelly, R. D.: 1990, ‘Boundary-Layer Heat and Moisture Budgets from FIFE’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 50, 109–138.Google Scholar
- Claussen, M.: 1990, ‘Area-averaging of Surface Fluxes in a Neutrally Stratified, Horizontally Inhomogeneous Atmospheric Boundary Layer’,Atmos. Envir. 24a, 1349–1360.Google Scholar
- Claussen, M.: 1991, ‘Estimation of Areally-averaged Surface Fluxes’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol.,54, 387–410.Google Scholar
- de Bruin, H. A. R., Bink, N. J. and Kroon, L. J. M.: 1991, ‘Fluxes in the Surface Layer under Advective Conditions’, in T. J. Schmugge and J.-C. André (eds.),Land Surface Evaporation; Measurement and Parameterization, pp. 157–170, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
- Desjardins, R. L., MacPherson, J. I., Schuepp, P. H., and Hayhoe, H.: 1992, ‘Airborne Flux Measurements of CO2, sensible and latent heat over the Hudson Bay Lowland’,J. Geophys. Res.,Google Scholar
- Doran, J. C. and Colleagues.: 1992, ‘The Boardman Regional Flux Experiment’,Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 73, 1785–1795.Google Scholar
- Ducoudré, N. I., Laval, K. and Perrier, A.: 1993, ‘SECHIBA, a New Set of Parameterizations of the Hydrologic Exchanges at the Land/Atmosphere Interface within the LMD Atmospheric General Circulation Model’,J. of Clim. 6, 248–273.Google Scholar
- Gamage, N., and Hagelberg, C.: 1993, ‘Detection and Analysis of Microfronts and Associated Coherent Events Using Localized Transforms’,J. Atmos. Sci. 50, 750–756.Google Scholar
- Garratt, J. R.: 1990, ‘The Internal Boundary Layer—a Review’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 50, 171–203.Google Scholar
- Garratt, J. R.: 1992,The Atmospheric Boundary Layer, Cambridge University Press. 316 pp.Google Scholar
- Hadfield, M. G., Cotton, W. R. and Pielke, R. A.: 1992, ‘Large-eddy Simulations of Thermally Forced Circulations in the Convective Boundary Layer. Part II: The Effect of Changes in Wavelength and Wind Speed’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 58, 307–327.Google Scholar
- Hechtel, L. M., Moeng, C.-H. and Stull, R. B.: 1990, ‘The Effects of Nonhomogeneous Surface Fluxes on the Convective Boundary Layer: A Case Study Using Large-eddy Simulation’,J. Atmos. Sci. 47, 1721–1741.Google Scholar
- Huang, X. and Lyons, T. J.: 1993, ‘A Simple Land Surface Atmosphere Model’,Aust. Meteorol. Mag., submitted.Google Scholar
- Lange, A. R. G., McNaughton, K. G., Chen, F., Bradley, E. F. and Ohtaki, E.: 1983, ‘Inequality of Eddy Transfer Coefficients for Vertical Transport of Sensible and Latent Heats During Advective Inversions’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 25, 25–41.Google Scholar
- MacPherson, J. I.: 1992, ‘NRC Twin Otter Operations in the 1991 California Ozone Deposition Experiment’, Rept LTR-FR-118. Flight Research Laboratory, National Research Council., Ottawa, Canada K1A 0R6.Google Scholar
- MacPherson, J. I., Schmidt, R. W. H., Jochum, A. M., Pearson, R. Jr., Neumann, H. H. and Den Hartog, G.: 1993, ‘Ozone Flux Measurement on the NRC Twin Otter during the 1991 California Ozone Deposition Experiment’,Proceedings of the American Meteorological Society Eighth Symposium on Meteorological Observations. Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
- Mahrt, L.: 1987, ‘Grid-averaged Surface Fluxes’,Mon. Wea. Rev. 115, 1550–1560.Google Scholar
- Mahrt, L.: 1991a, ‘Eddy Asymmetry in the Sheared Heated Boundary Layer’,J. Atmos. Sci. 48, 472–492.Google Scholar
- Mahrt, L.: 1991b, ‘Boundary-layer Moisture Regimes’,Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 117, 151–176.Google Scholar
- Mason, P. J.: 1988, ‘The Formation of Areally-averaged Roughness Lengths’,Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 114, 399–420.Google Scholar
- Pielke, R. A. and Avissar, R.: 1990, ‘Influence of Landscape Structure on Local and Regional Climate’,Landscape Ecology 4, 133–155.Google Scholar
- Pinty, J.-P.: 1991, ‘A Numerical Study of Surface Flux Variability with a Mesoscale Model: Application to the HAPEX-MOBILHY Experiment’,The 10th Conference on Biomet. and Aerobio. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 181–184.Google Scholar
- Segal, M., Schreiber, W. E., Kallos, G., Garrat, J. R., Rodi, A., Weaver, J. and Pielke, R. A.: 1989, ‘The Impact of Crop Areas in Northeast Colorado on Midsummer Mesoscale Thermal Circulations’,Mon. Wea. Rev. 117, 809–825.Google Scholar
- Segal, M. and Arritt, R. W.: 1992, ‘Non-classical Mesoscale Circulations Caused by Surface Sensible Heat Flux Gradients’,Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 73, 1593–1604.Google Scholar
- Smith, E. A., Hsu, A. Y., Crosson, W. L., Field, R. T., Fritschen, L. J., Gurney, R. J., Kanemasu, E. T., Kustas, W. P., Nie, D., Shuttleworth, W. J., Stewart, J. B., Verma, S. B., Weaver, H. L. and Wesely, M. L.: 1992, ‘Area-averaged Surface Fluxes and Their Time-space Variability over the FIFE Experimental Domain’,J. Geophys. Res. 97, 18599–18622.Google Scholar
- Smith, B. and Mahrt, L.: 1981, ‘A Study of Boundary-Layer Pressure Adjustments’,J. Atmos. Sci. 38, 334–346.Google Scholar
- Vugts, H. F. and Businger, J. A.: 1977, ‘Air Modification Due to a Step Change in Surface Temperature’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 11, 295–306.Google Scholar