Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 67, Issue 4, pp 345–367 | Cite as

Observations of fluxes over heterogeneous surfaces

  • L. Mahrt
  • J. I. Macpherson
  • Ray Desjardins
Article

Abstract

This study analyzes data collected from repeated aircraft runs 30 m over alternating regions of irrigated and dry nonirrigated surfaces, each region on the order of 10 km across, during the California Ozone Deposition Experiment (CODE). After studying the scale dependence of the flow, the variables and their fluxes are decomposed into means for sublegs defined in terms of irrigated and nonirrigated regions and deviations from such subleg means. Since the repeated runs were flown over the same track, compositing the eight flight legs for each of the two days allows partial isolation of the influences of surface heterogeneity and transient mesoscale motions.

A variance analysis is carried out to quantify the relative importance of surface heterogeneity and transient mesoscale motions on the variability of the turbulence fluxes. The momentum and ozone fluxes are more influenced by transient mesoscale motions while fluxes of heat, moisture and carbon dioxide are more influenced by surface heterogeneity. The momentum field is also influenced by a quasi-stationary mesoscale front and larger scale velocity gradients.

For the present case, the mesoscale modulation of the turbulent flux is numerically more important than the direct mesoscale flux. This spatial modulation of the turbulent fluxes leads to extra Reynolds terms which act to reduce the area-averaged turbulent momentum flux and enhance the area-averaged turbulent heat flux.

Keywords

Heat Flux Momentum Flux Surface Heterogeneity Spatial Modulation Scale Dependence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. André, J. C., Bougeault, P., Mafouf, J.-F., Mascart, P., Noilhan, J. and Pinty, J.-P.: 1989, ‘Impact of Forests on Mesoscale Meteorology’,Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B324, 407–422.Google Scholar
  2. Avissar, R. and Pielke, R. A.: 1989, ‘A Parameterization of Heterogeneous Land Surfaces for Atmospheric Numerical Models and its Impact on Regional Meteorology’,Mon. Wea. Rev. 117, 2113–2136.Google Scholar
  3. Bache, D. H. and Unsworth, M. H.: 1977, ‘Some Aerodynamic Features of a Cotton Canopy’,Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 103, 121–134.Google Scholar
  4. Betts, A. K., Desjardins, R. L., Macpherson, J. I. and Kelly, R. D.: 1990, ‘Boundary-Layer Heat and Moisture Budgets from FIFE’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 50, 109–138.Google Scholar
  5. Claussen, M.: 1990, ‘Area-averaging of Surface Fluxes in a Neutrally Stratified, Horizontally Inhomogeneous Atmospheric Boundary Layer’,Atmos. Envir. 24a, 1349–1360.Google Scholar
  6. Claussen, M.: 1991, ‘Estimation of Areally-averaged Surface Fluxes’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol.,54, 387–410.Google Scholar
  7. de Bruin, H. A. R., Bink, N. J. and Kroon, L. J. M.: 1991, ‘Fluxes in the Surface Layer under Advective Conditions’, in T. J. Schmugge and J.-C. André (eds.),Land Surface Evaporation; Measurement and Parameterization, pp. 157–170, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Desjardins, R. L., MacPherson, J. I., Schuepp, P. H., and Hayhoe, H.: 1992, ‘Airborne Flux Measurements of CO2, sensible and latent heat over the Hudson Bay Lowland’,J. Geophys. Res.,Google Scholar
  9. Doran, J. C. and Colleagues.: 1992, ‘The Boardman Regional Flux Experiment’,Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 73, 1785–1795.Google Scholar
  10. Ducoudré, N. I., Laval, K. and Perrier, A.: 1993, ‘SECHIBA, a New Set of Parameterizations of the Hydrologic Exchanges at the Land/Atmosphere Interface within the LMD Atmospheric General Circulation Model’,J. of Clim. 6, 248–273.Google Scholar
  11. Gamage, N., and Hagelberg, C.: 1993, ‘Detection and Analysis of Microfronts and Associated Coherent Events Using Localized Transforms’,J. Atmos. Sci. 50, 750–756.Google Scholar
  12. Garratt, J. R.: 1990, ‘The Internal Boundary Layer—a Review’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 50, 171–203.Google Scholar
  13. Garratt, J. R.: 1992,The Atmospheric Boundary Layer, Cambridge University Press. 316 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Hadfield, M. G., Cotton, W. R. and Pielke, R. A.: 1992, ‘Large-eddy Simulations of Thermally Forced Circulations in the Convective Boundary Layer. Part II: The Effect of Changes in Wavelength and Wind Speed’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 58, 307–327.Google Scholar
  15. Hechtel, L. M., Moeng, C.-H. and Stull, R. B.: 1990, ‘The Effects of Nonhomogeneous Surface Fluxes on the Convective Boundary Layer: A Case Study Using Large-eddy Simulation’,J. Atmos. Sci. 47, 1721–1741.Google Scholar
  16. Huang, X. and Lyons, T. J.: 1993, ‘A Simple Land Surface Atmosphere Model’,Aust. Meteorol. Mag., submitted.Google Scholar
  17. Lange, A. R. G., McNaughton, K. G., Chen, F., Bradley, E. F. and Ohtaki, E.: 1983, ‘Inequality of Eddy Transfer Coefficients for Vertical Transport of Sensible and Latent Heats During Advective Inversions’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 25, 25–41.Google Scholar
  18. MacPherson, J. I.: 1992, ‘NRC Twin Otter Operations in the 1991 California Ozone Deposition Experiment’, Rept LTR-FR-118. Flight Research Laboratory, National Research Council., Ottawa, Canada K1A 0R6.Google Scholar
  19. MacPherson, J. I., Schmidt, R. W. H., Jochum, A. M., Pearson, R. Jr., Neumann, H. H. and Den Hartog, G.: 1993, ‘Ozone Flux Measurement on the NRC Twin Otter during the 1991 California Ozone Deposition Experiment’,Proceedings of the American Meteorological Society Eighth Symposium on Meteorological Observations. Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
  20. Mahrt, L.: 1987, ‘Grid-averaged Surface Fluxes’,Mon. Wea. Rev. 115, 1550–1560.Google Scholar
  21. Mahrt, L.: 1991a, ‘Eddy Asymmetry in the Sheared Heated Boundary Layer’,J. Atmos. Sci. 48, 472–492.Google Scholar
  22. Mahrt, L.: 1991b, ‘Boundary-layer Moisture Regimes’,Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 117, 151–176.Google Scholar
  23. Mason, P. J.: 1988, ‘The Formation of Areally-averaged Roughness Lengths’,Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 114, 399–420.Google Scholar
  24. Pielke, R. A. and Avissar, R.: 1990, ‘Influence of Landscape Structure on Local and Regional Climate’,Landscape Ecology 4, 133–155.Google Scholar
  25. Pinty, J.-P.: 1991, ‘A Numerical Study of Surface Flux Variability with a Mesoscale Model: Application to the HAPEX-MOBILHY Experiment’,The 10th Conference on Biomet. and Aerobio. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 181–184.Google Scholar
  26. Segal, M., Schreiber, W. E., Kallos, G., Garrat, J. R., Rodi, A., Weaver, J. and Pielke, R. A.: 1989, ‘The Impact of Crop Areas in Northeast Colorado on Midsummer Mesoscale Thermal Circulations’,Mon. Wea. Rev. 117, 809–825.Google Scholar
  27. Segal, M. and Arritt, R. W.: 1992, ‘Non-classical Mesoscale Circulations Caused by Surface Sensible Heat Flux Gradients’,Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 73, 1593–1604.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, E. A., Hsu, A. Y., Crosson, W. L., Field, R. T., Fritschen, L. J., Gurney, R. J., Kanemasu, E. T., Kustas, W. P., Nie, D., Shuttleworth, W. J., Stewart, J. B., Verma, S. B., Weaver, H. L. and Wesely, M. L.: 1992, ‘Area-averaged Surface Fluxes and Their Time-space Variability over the FIFE Experimental Domain’,J. Geophys. Res. 97, 18599–18622.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, B. and Mahrt, L.: 1981, ‘A Study of Boundary-Layer Pressure Adjustments’,J. Atmos. Sci. 38, 334–346.Google Scholar
  30. Vugts, H. F. and Businger, J. A.: 1977, ‘Air Modification Due to a Step Change in Surface Temperature’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 11, 295–306.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Mahrt
    • 1
  • J. I. Macpherson
    • 2
  • Ray Desjardins
    • 3
  1. 1.Oceanic and Atmospheric SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Flight Research LaboratoryNational Research CouncilOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Centre for Land and Biological Resource ResearchAgriculture CanadaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations