Electromechanical delay in the vastus lateralis muscle during dynamic isometric contractions

  • E. J. Vos
  • M. G. Mullender
  • G. J. van Ingen Schenau
Article

Summary

Electromechanical delay (EMD) values were obtained using a cross-correlation technique for a series of 14 repetitive submaximal dynamic isometric contractions of the vastus lateralis performed by five subjects. To avoid a phase lag, which is introduced with one-way filtering, the EMG was processed with a bi-directional application of a second-order Butterworth filter. A mean EMD value of 86 ms (SD=5.1 ms) was found. Moreover, contraction and relaxation delays were computed and compared. There was a significant difference between the contraction and relaxation delays (P<0.005). The mean contraction delay was 81.9 ms and the mean relaxation delay was 88.8 ms. Despite this significant difference, the computed contraction and relaxation delay values lie in the same range as the total phase lag, calculated with the cross-correlation technique. The magnitude of EMD values found supports the need to account for this delay when interpreting temporal aspects of patterns of intermuscular coordination.

Key words

Electromechanical delay Contraction delay Relaxation delay Cross-correlation technique 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bell DG, Jacobs I (1986) Electro-mechanical response times and rate of force development in males and females. Med Sci Sports Exerc 18:31–36Google Scholar
  2. Bobbert MF, Ingen Schenau GJ van (1988) Coordination in vertical jumping. J Biomech 21:249–262Google Scholar
  3. Caldwell LS, Chaffin DB, Dukes-Dobos FN, Kroemer KHE, Laubach LL, Snook SH, Wasserman DE (1974) A proposed standard procedure for static muscles strength testing. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 35:201–206Google Scholar
  4. Cavanagh PR, Komi PV (1979) Electromechanical delay in human skeletal muscle under concentric and eccentric contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol 42:159–163Google Scholar
  5. Hof AL (1984) EMG and muscle force: an introduction. Hum Mov Sci 3:119–153Google Scholar
  6. Grabiner MD (1986) Bioelectric characteristics of the electromechanical delay preceding concentric contraction. Med Sci Sports Exerc 18:37–43Google Scholar
  7. Horita T, Ishiko T (1987) Relationships between muscle lactate accumulation and surface EMG activities during isokinetic contractions in man. Eur J Appl Physiol 56:18–23Google Scholar
  8. Houston ME, Norman RW, Froese EA (1988) Mechanical measures during maximal velocity knee extension exercise and their relation to fibre composition of the human vastus lateralis muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol 58:1–7Google Scholar
  9. Ingen Schenau GJ van (1989) From rotation to translation: constraints in multi-joint movements and the unique action of biarticular muscles. Hum Mov Sci 8:301–337Google Scholar
  10. Ingen Schenau GJ van, Bobbert MF, Rozendal RH (1987) The unique action of bi-articular muscles in complex movements. J Anat 155:1–5Google Scholar
  11. Inman VT, Ralston HJ, Saunders JB de CM, Feinstein B, Wright EW (1952) Relation of human electromyogram to muscular tension. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 4:187–194Google Scholar
  12. Koning JJ, Groot G de, Ingen Schenau GJ van (1988) Muscle coordination in elite and trained speed skaters. In: Wallinga W, Boom HBK, de Vries J (eds) Electrophysiological kinesiology. Exerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 485–488Google Scholar
  13. Moritani T, Berry MJ, Bacharach DW, Nakamura E (1987) Gas exchange parameters, muscle blood flow and electromechanical properties of the plantar flexors. Eur J Appl Physiol 56:30–57Google Scholar
  14. Morris AF (1977) Effects of fatiguing isometric and isotonic exercise on resisted and unresisted reaction time components. Eur J Appl Physiol 37:1–11Google Scholar
  15. Muro M, Nagata A (1985) The effects on electromechanical delay of muscle stretch of the human triceps surae. In: Winter DA, Norman RW, Wells RP, Hayes KC, Patla AE (eds) Biomechanics IX-A. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 86–90Google Scholar
  16. Norman RW, Komi PV (1979) Electromechanical delay in skeletal muscle under normal movement conditions. Acta Physiol Scand 106:241–248Google Scholar
  17. Papoulis A (1984) Signal analyis. McGraw-Hill, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  18. Olney SJ, Winter DA (1985) Predictions of knee and ankle moments of force in walking from EMG and kinematic data. J Biomech 18:9–20Google Scholar
  19. Ralston HJ, Todd FN, Inman VT (1976) Comparison of electrical activity and duration of tension in the human rectus femoris muscle. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 16:277–286Google Scholar
  20. Sherif MH, Gregor RJ, Liu LM, Roy RR, Hager CL (1983) Correlation of myoelectric activity and muscle force during selected cat treadmill locomotion. J Biomech 16:691–701Google Scholar
  21. Simonsen EB, Thomsen L, Klausen K (1985) Activity of monoand bi-articular muscles during sprint running. Eur J Appl Physiol 54:524–532Google Scholar
  22. Viitasalo JT, Komi PV (1981) Interrelationships between electromyographic, mechanical, muscle structure and reflex time measurements in man. Acta Physiol Scand 111:97–103Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. J. Vos
    • 1
  • M. G. Mullender
    • 1
  • G. J. van Ingen Schenau
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Human Movement SciencesFree UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations