Wood Science and Technology

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 225–234 | Cite as

Theory of X-ray measurement of microfibril angle in wood

Part 2. The diffraction diagram X-ray diffraction by materials with fibre type symmetry
  • I. D. Cave
Originals

Summary

A diffraction intensity function for material bodies composed of arrays of crystalline fibres such as occurs with the cellulose of wood has been derived. It is implied in the analysis that the crystalline fibres making up the body have fibre symmetry- that there is a tendency for groups of fibres to have one set of crystal axes parallel while in the orthogonal direction the axes assume a low degree of order. It is further assumed that the patterns of the angular arrangement of the fibre groups relative to one axis of the body is independent of the direction about that axis. These conditions are believed to be compatible with the cellulosic structure found in wood. Thus it becomes possible to calculate the expected diffraction intensity profiles of realistic (and therefore complex) models of wood. This has aided the interpretation of the reflections from the (040) crystal planes of cellulose which are contaminated by low level reflections from other crystal planes, and it has been found that it might be possible by conjoint analysis of the paratropic (002) reflections and the diatropic (040) reflections to measure the complete cell wall planar microfibril angle distribution and the shape of the cell wall cross-section.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barber, N. F. 1968: A theoretical model of shrinking wood. Holzforschung. 22: 97–103Google Scholar
  2. Cave, I. D. 1976: Modelling the structure of the softwood cell wall for computation of mechanical properties. Wood Sci. Technol. 10, 19–28Google Scholar
  3. Cave, I. D. 1997: X-ray Measurement of Microfibril Angle. Part 1: The Condition for Reflection. Wood Sci. Technol. (in press)Google Scholar
  4. Kataoka, Y.;Saiki H.;Fujita M. 1992: Arrangement and Supperposition of Cellulose Microfibrils in the Secondary Walls of Coniferous Tracheids. Mokuzai Gakkaishi. 38: 327–355Google Scholar
  5. El-osta, M.;Lotfy M.;Kellog, R. M.;Foschi, R. O.;Butters, R. G. 1973: A Direct X-Ray Technique for Measuring Microfibril Angle. Wood and Fiber. 5: 118–128Google Scholar
  6. Meyer, K. H.;Misch, H. 1937: Positions des atomes dans le nouveau modèle spatial de la cellulose. Helv. Chem. Acta. 20: 232–244Google Scholar
  7. Meylan, B. A. 1967: Measurement of microfibril angle inPinus radiata by X-ray diffraction. Forest Prod. J. 17: 51–58Google Scholar
  8. Meylan, B. A.;Probine, M. C. 1969: Microfibril angle as a parameter in timber quality assessment. Forest Prod. J. 19: 30–34Google Scholar
  9. Page, D. H.;El-Hosseiny, F.;Winkler, K.;Lancaster, A. P. S. 1977: Elastic modulus of single wood pulp fibers. Tappi. 60: 114–117Google Scholar
  10. Pain, H. J. 1983: The Physics of Vibrations and Waves. 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Preston, R. D.;Cronshaw, J. 1958: Constitution of the fibrillar and non-fibrillar components of the walls ofValonia ventricosa. Nature 181: 248–250Google Scholar
  12. Preston, R. D. 1974: The Physical Biology of Plant Cell Walls. London: Chapman and Hall Ltd.Google Scholar
  13. Prud'homme, R. E.;Noah, J. 1975: Determination of Fibril Angle Distribution in Wood Fibers: A comparison between the X-ray diffraction and the polarized microscope methods. Wood and Fiber. 6: 282–289Google Scholar
  14. Spark, L. C.;Darnborough, G.;Preston, R. D. 1958: Structure and Mechanical Properties of Vegetable Fibres. II A Microextensometer for the automatic recording of load-extension curves for single fibrous cells. J. Text. Inst. 49: T309Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. D. Cave
    • 1
  1. 1.RD2 Upper MoutereNelsonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations