Marine Biology

, Volume 118, Issue 1, pp 167–176 | Cite as

Similarity-based testing for community pattern: the two-way layout with no replication

  • K. R. Clarke
  • R. M. Warwick
Article

Abstract

The large, sparse arrays of species counts arising in both field and experimental community studies do not lend themselves to standard statistical tests based on multivariate normality. Instead, a valid and more revealing approach uses informal display methods, such as clustering or multi-dimensional scaling ordination (MDS), based on a biologically-motivated definition of pairwise similarity of samples in terms of species composition. Formal testing methods are still required, however, to establish that real assemblage differences exist between sites, times, experimental treatments, pollution states, etc. Earlier work has described a range of Manteltype permutation or randomisation procedures, making no distributional assumptions, which are termed ANOSIM tests because of their dependence only on (rank) similarities and the analogy to one and two-way ANOVA. This paper extends these tests to cover an important practical case, previously unconsidered, that of a two-way layoutwithout replication. Such cases arise for single samples (or pseudo-replicates) taken in a baseline monitoring survey of several sites over time, or a mesocosm experiment in which “treatments” are replicated only once within each experimental “block”. Significance tests are given for the overall presence of a treatment (or time) effect, based on a measure of concordance between rank similarities of samples within each block (or site); the role of the two factors can be reversed to obtain a test for block effects. As in the analogous univariate ANOVA test, the method relies on absence or relative weakness of treatment x block “interactions”. Its scope is illustrated with data from two experimental and two field studies, involving meiofaunal communities from soft-sediment and macro-algal habitats. It is seen also to accommodate a modest derree of missing data. Whilst the failure to replicate adequately is not encouraged—a richer inference is available with genuine replication—the paper does provide a limited way forward for hypothesis testing in the absence of replicates.

Keywords

Mesocosm Experiment Univariate ANOVA Standard Statistical Test Sparse Array ANOSIM Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austen, M. C. (1989). Factors affecting estuarine meiobenthic assemblage structure: a multifactorial microcosm experiment. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 130: 167–187Google Scholar
  2. Austen, M C., Warwick, R. M. (1989). Comparison of univariate and multivariate aspects of estuarine meiobenthic community structure. Estuar., cstl Shelf Sci. 29: 23–42Google Scholar
  3. Austen, M. C., Warwick, R. M. (1993). Effects of experimental manipulation of food supply on estuarine meiobenthos. Hydrobiologia (in press)Google Scholar
  4. Bray, J. R., Curtis, J. T. (1957). An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27: 325–349Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, K. R. (1993). Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 18: 117–143Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, K. R., Ainsworth, M. (1993). A method of linking multivariate community structure to environmental variables. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 92: 205–219Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, K. R., Green, R. H. (1988). Statistical design and analysis for a ‘bilogical effects’ study. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 46: 213–226Google Scholar
  8. Dawson-Shepherd, A, Warwick, R. M., Clarke, K. R., Brown, B. E. (1992). An analysis of fish community responses to coral mining in the Maldives. Envir. Biol. Fish. 33: 367–380Google Scholar
  9. Faith, D. P., Minchin, P. R., Belbin, L. (1987). Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio 69: 57–68Google Scholar
  10. Field, J. G., Clarke, K. R., Warwick, R. M. (1982). A practical strategy for analysing multispecies distribution patterns. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 8: 37–52Google Scholar
  11. Gee, J. M., Austen, M., De Smet, G., Ferraro, T., McEvoy, A., Moore, S., Van Gausbeki, D., Vincx, M., Warwick, R. M. (1992). Soft sediment meiofauna community responses to environmental pollution gradients in the German Bight and at the site of a former Dutch oil rig. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 91: 289–302Google Scholar
  12. Gee, J. M., Warwick, R. M., Schaanning, M., Berge, J. A., Ambrose, Jr., W. G. (1985). Effects of organic enrichment on meiofaunal abundance and community structure in sublittoral soft sediments. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 91: 247–262Google Scholar
  13. Gower, J. C. (1971). Statistical methods of comparing different multivariate analyses of the same data. In: Hodson, F. R., Kendall, D. G., Tautu, P. (eds.) Mathematics in the archaeological and historical sciences. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, p. 138–149Google Scholar
  14. Gray, J. S., Aschan, M., Carr, M. R., Clarke, K. R., Green R. H., Pearson, T. H., Rosenberg, R., Warwick, R. M. (1988). Analysis of community attributes of the benthic macrofauna of Frierfjord/Langesundfjord and in a mesocosm experiment. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 46: 151–165Google Scholar
  15. Hope, A. C. A. (1968). A simplified Monte Carlo significance test procedure. J. R. statist. Soc. (Ser. B) 30: 582–598Google Scholar
  16. Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54: 187–211Google Scholar
  17. Kendall, M. G. (1970). Rank correlation methods. Griffin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Kenkel, N. C., Orloci, L. (1986). Applying metric and nonmetric multidimensional scaling to some ecological studies: some new results. Ecology 67: 919–928Google Scholar
  19. Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Multidimensional scaling by optimising goodness of fit to a non-metric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29: 1–27Google Scholar
  20. Kruskal, J. B, Wish, M., (1978) Multidimensional scaling. Sage Publications. Beverley Hills, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  21. Mantel, N. (1967). The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach Cancer Res 27: 209–220Google Scholar
  22. Mardia, K. V., Kent, J. T., Bibby, J. M. (1979). Multivariate analysis. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Scheffé, H. (1959) The analysis of variance. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Spence, I., Grael, J. (1974). The determination of the underlying dimensionality of an empirically obtaied matrix of proximities. Multiv. behavl Res. 9: 331–342Google Scholar
  25. Underwood, A. J. (1981). Techniques of analysis of variance in experimental marine biology and ecology. Oceanogr. mar. Biol. A. Rev. 19: 513–605Google Scholar
  26. Warwick, R. M. (1971). Nematode associations in the Exe estuary. J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K. 51: 439–454Google Scholar
  27. Warwick, R. M., Carr, M. R., Clarke, K. R., Gee, J. M., Green, R. H. (1988). A mesocosm experiment on the effects of hydrocarbon and copper pollution on a sublittoral soft-sediment meiobenthic community. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 46: 181–191Google Scholar
  28. Warwick, R. M., Clarke, K. R. (1991). A comparison of some methods for analysing changes in benthic community structure. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 71: 225–244Google Scholar
  29. Warwick, R. M., Clarke, K. R., Gee, J. M. (1990a). The effect of disturbance by soldier crabs,Mictyris platycheles H. Milne Edwards, on meiobenthic community structure. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 135: 19–33Google Scholar
  30. Warwick, R. M., Clarke, K. R, Suharsono (1990b). A statistical analysis of coral community responses to the 1982–83 El Niño in the Thousand Islands, Indonesia. Coral Reefs 8: 171–179Google Scholar
  31. Warwick, R. M., Platt, H. M., Clarke, K. R., Agard, J., Gobin, J. (1990c). Analysis of macrobenthic and meiobenthic community structure in relation to pollution and disturbance in Hamilton Harbour, Bermuda. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 138: 119–142Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. R. Clarke
    • 1
  • R. M. Warwick
    • 1
  1. 1.Plymouth Marine LaboratoryPlymouthEngland

Personalised recommendations