Measured specific gravity, predicted specific gravity and total body water relationships in normal young men

  • Ronald G. Early
  • B. Robert Carlson
  • S. W. CasnerJr.
Article

Summary

The purpose of this investigation was to compare measured specific gravity values with predicted specific gravity values from skinfold measures using various prediction formulae.

Skinfold measurements were made of the unbilicus, triceps and chest of each of twenty-six young adult males. Specific gravities were predicted from the measurements using different formulae. Specific gravity was then determined for each subject by underwater weighing. Total body water was determined for each subject using the tritium dilution technique.

Predicted specific gravity values from the male triceps skinfold formula were not significantly different from actual specific gravity values. Predicted specific gravity from the male umbilicus skinfold measures and from the male chest skinfold formula were significantly different from actual specific gravity. Specific gravity was also predicted from a formula for females and all of these predicted specific gravity values were significantly different from actual specific gravity. Estimates of total body water revealed that body water content averaged 53 per cent of body weight and a range of 11 per cent. This variation is important and must be considered when small samples are used for measuring specific gravity by the water displacement technique.

Key-Words

Specific Gravity Body Composition Body Fluids Skin-folds Fat Prediction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Behnke, A. R., Osserman, E. P., Welham, W. C.: Lean body mass. Arch. int. Mod.91, 585–601 (1953).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    —: Physiologic studies pertaining to deep sea diving and aviation, especially in relation to the fat content and composition of the body. Harvey Lect.37, 198 (1941/42).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    —, Welham, W. C.: The specific gravity of healthy men. J. Amer. med. Ass.118, 498–501 (1942).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brozek, J., Keys, A.: Relative body weight, age and fatness. Geriatrics8, 70–75 (1953).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    —, Brock, J. F., Fidanza, F. Keys, A.: Skinfold caliper estimation of body fat and nutritional status. Fed. Proc.13, 19 (1954).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    —: Body composition. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.110, 1–424 (1963).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Edwards, A. L.: Experimental Design in Psychological Research, Revised edition. New York: Holt-Rinehart and Winston 1964.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fletcher, R. F.: The measurement of total body fat with skinfold calipers. Clin. Sci.22, 333–346 (1962).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnson, P. C.: Personal Correspondence, Baylor University College of Medicine, Radioisotope Laboratory, The Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, April, 1967.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keys, A., Brozek, J.: Body fat in adult man. Physiol. Rev.33, 245–325 (1953).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pascale, L. R., Grossman, M. I., Sloane, H. S., Frankel, T.: Correlations between thickness of skinfolds and body density in 88 soldiers. Hum. Biol.28, 165–176 (1956).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rathbun, E. N., Pace, N.: Studies on body composition. The determination of total body fat by means of the body specific gravity. J. biol. Chem.158, 667–676 (1945).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Young, C. M., Martin, M. E. K., McCarthy, M. C. M., Manniello, M. J., Harmuth, E. H., Fryer, J. H.: Body composition of young women. J. Amer. diet. Ass.38, 332–340 (1961).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    — —, Tensuan, R., Blondin, J.: Predicting specific gravity and body fatness in young women. J. Amer. diet. Ass.40, 102–107 (1962).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    —, Tensuan, R. S.: Estimating the lean body mass of young women. J. Amer. diet. Ass.42, 46–51 (1963).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald G. Early
    • 1
  • B. Robert Carlson
    • 2
  • S. W. CasnerJr.
    • 3
  1. 1.The University of WashingtonUSA
  2. 2.The University of KansasUSA
  3. 3.Austin

Personalised recommendations