Advertisement

The effect of some drugs on the maximal capacity of athletic performance in man

  • R. Margaria
  • P. Aghemo
  • E. Rovelli
Article

Summary

On three trained subjects the effects of some drugs on a) the maximum oxygen consumption, b) the time of performance in an anaerobic exercise, c) the blood lactic acid, and finally d) the maximum heart rate, have been studied. The exercise was a run on a treadmill at 12 alternately 13.8 km/h on a 5% incline carried until exhaustion (ab. 5–6 mins).

The drugs administered with a double blind system, were amphetamine (10 mg), caffeine (100 mg and resp. 250 mg), ascorbic acid (250 mg), flavon-7 — ethile ossiacetate (“Recordil”, 90 and 180 mg); the placebo was starch (250 mg).

Five tests have been made for each drug and for each subject: the statistical analysis of the data shows that the drugs, as tested, have no significant effect on any of the tests made, including time of performance and maximum oxygen consumption, which seems to us particularly significant.

Keywords

Oxygen Placebo Heart Rate Starch Ascorbic Acid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Atti del Congresso di Psicoergofarmacologia, Roma 1962.Google Scholar
  2. Boje, O.: Bull. Hlth Org. Lo N8, 439 1939 (fromRasch-Pierson andBrubakeer).Google Scholar
  3. Gercken, G.: Hoppe Seylers Z. Physiol. Chem.320, 180 (1960).Google Scholar
  4. Graf, O.: Arbeitsphysiologie10, 692 (1939).Google Scholar
  5. Ivy, A. C., andL. R. Krasno: War. Med. (Chic.)1, 15 (1941).Google Scholar
  6. Karpovich, P. V.: J. Amer. med. Ass.170, 558 (1959).Google Scholar
  7. Lehmann, G., H. Straub, andA. Szakàll: Arbeitsphysiologie10, 680 (1939).Google Scholar
  8. Margaria, R.: Meeting of the Research committee of the Intern, council of Sport and Physical Educ. Rome 1960.Google Scholar
  9. —, andH. T. Edwards: Amer. J. Physiol.107, 681 (1933).Google Scholar
  10. —,E. Galante, andP. Cerretelli: J. appl. Physiol.14, 1066 (1959).Google Scholar
  11. Rasch, P. J., W. R. Pierson, andM. L. Brubacker: Int. Z. angew. Physiol.18, 280 (1960).Google Scholar
  12. Report to the Committee on Amphetamines and Athletes. To the Board of Trusters of the American Medical Association, May 20, 1959.Google Scholar
  13. Segers, M., J.S'jongers and L.Lewillie: Travaux du Service d'études de l'ineps. vol. 2, 1962.Google Scholar
  14. Smith, G. M., andH. K. Beecker: J. Amer. med. Ass.170, 542 (1959).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1964

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Margaria
    • 1
  • P. Aghemo
    • 1
  • E. Rovelli
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Fisiologia UmanaUniversità di MilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations