Virchows Archiv A

, Volume 402, Issue 2, pp 195–201 | Cite as

Cervical tissue shrinkage by formaldehyde fixation, paraffin wax embedding, section cutting and mounting

  • H. Boonstra
  • J. W. Oosterhuis
  • A. M. Oosterhuis
  • G. J. Fleuren
Review

Summary

To evaluate the efficacy of cryocoagulation as a treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (C.I.N.), it is necessary to know the maximum depth of the glandular crypts, the maximum crypt involvement by C.I.N. and the extension of the cryolesion, obtained under standardized conditions. In a morphometric study on this subject, one has to take into account the shrinkage of the cervical tissue, caused by processing the tissue for histological examination.

In the present study, tissue shrinkage of the cervix in different directions was measured in three separate steps. First shrinkage caused by formalin fixation was determined, second shrinkage caused by dehydration, clearing and paraffin wax embedding and finally that caused by section cutting and mounting.

Shrinkage caused by formalin fixation, and by dehydration, clearing and paraffin wax embedding did not differ significantly in the different directions and resulted in an average shrinkage of respectively 2.7% and 12.6% of the original dimensions. The alterations of the dimensions by section cutting and mounting is not a process of shrinkage, but actually a deformation caused by pressure on the tissue during sectioning. Generally the dimension decreases in the cutting direction and increases in the direction perpendicular to it. In the calculation of the total shrinkage these alterations can be neglected, since the changes, although not consistent are small.

It follows that in morphometric studies a total shrinkage of about 15% of the original dimensions has to be taken into consideration.

Key-words

Cervix uteri Shrinkage Histological technics Formaldehyde Paraffin Sectioning-mounting 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson MC, Hartley RB (1980) Cervical crypt involvement by intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 55:546–550Google Scholar
  2. Baker JR (1960) Principles of biological microtechnique. A study of fixation and dyeing. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg W (1908) Quoted by Baker JR (1960) Principles of biological microtechnique. A study of fixation and dyeing. Methuen, London, pp 76, 98Google Scholar
  4. Burghardt E (1972) Histologische Frühdiagnose des Zervixkrebses. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  5. Charles EH, Savage EW (1980) Cryosurgical treatment of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol Surv 35:539–548Google Scholar
  6. Gordon KC (1982) Tissue processing. In: Bancroft JD, Stevens A (eds) Theory and practice of histological techniques. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 41–60Google Scholar
  7. Hopwood D (1982) Fixation and fixatives. In: Bancroft JD, Stevens A (eds) Theory and practice of histological techniques. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 20–40Google Scholar
  8. Przybora LA, Plutowa A (1959) Histological topography of carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri. Cancer 12:263–277Google Scholar
  9. Puchtler H, Waldrop FS, Melvan SN, Terry MS, Conner HM (1970) Methacarn (Methanol-Carnoy) fixation. Practical and theoretical considerations. Histochemie 21:97–116Google Scholar
  10. Singer A, Walker P (1982) Commentary. What is the optimum treatment of cervical premalignancy? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 89:335–337Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Boonstra
    • 1
  • J. W. Oosterhuis
    • 2
  • A. M. Oosterhuis
    • 2
  • G. J. Fleuren
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of GroningenGroningen
  2. 2.Department of Pathology)University of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations