Design considerations for STJ x-ray detectors
Superconducting Films And Tunnel Junction Detectors
- 19 Downloads
- 4 Citations
Abstract
The geometrical shape and layer thicknesses of superconducting tunnel junctions (STJ) influence their suitability as x-ray detectors. Examples relating to field biasing are discussed. Two related energy loss mechanisms are also modeled.
Keywords
Layer Thickness Energy Loss Magnetic Material Related Energy Geometrical Shape
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.R.L. Petterson, Cryogenics 31, 132 (1991).Google Scholar
- 2.E.P. Houwman,et al., pages 255–263 in Low Temperature Detectors for Neutrinos and Dark Matter IV, N.E. Booth and G.L. Salmon, Editions Frontieres, 1991.Google Scholar
- 3.A. Matsumura, T. Takahashi, and M. Kurakado, NIM A329, 227 (1993).Google Scholar
- 4.Deborah Van Vechten and Kent S. Wood, IEEE Trans. on Appl. SuperCond. 3, 2096 (1993).Google Scholar
- 5.Kent S. Wood and Deborah Van Vechten, to be submitted.Google Scholar
- 6.Hans le Grand, personal communication, July 1993.Google Scholar
- 7.M. Kurakado, personal communication, July 1992.Google Scholar
- 8.See Superconductive Particle Detectors, A. Barone,ed, World Scientific,1988.Google Scholar
- 9.See, for example, the spectra in C.A. Mears, S.E. Labov, and A.T. Barfknecht, submitted to Appl. Phys. Let., May, 1993.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993