Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 87–101 | Cite as

Scale-eating in characoids and other fishes

  • Ivan Sazima
Papers from a symposium on the Evolutionary Ecology of Neotropical Freshwater Fishes

Synopsis

Scale-eating is known for several unrelated fish groups, but few data are available on the habits of most species. General habits and feeding behavior of some lepidophagous characoids are presented and compared to other scale-eating species. The diversity of morphology, habits, and behavior of scale-eating fishes is great, and few patterns are shared by the specialized scale-eaters. Except for modified teeth, no morphological characteristic permits identifying a fish as a specialized lepidophage. Hunting tactics consist mainly of ambush, stalking, or disguise (aggressive mimicry). Scale-removal may be accomplished by a jarring strike with the snout, generally directed at the prey's flank, or by biting or rasping. The mode of scale-removal seems to reflect primarily the disposition of the jaws and the teeth. Scales are swallowed directly if taken in the mouth; if not, they are gathered as they sink, or picked up from the bottom. Scale-eating is probably a size-limited habit. Specialized scale-eaters rarely exceed 200 mm, most ranging near 120 mm. Some species eat scales only when young; most take other food items in addition to scales. Scale-eating habits probably arose from trophic or social behaviors. These are not mutually exclusive and, indeed, may have acted together during the evolution of lepidophagy. Suggested trophic origins include scraping epilithic algae, modified piscivory, and necrophagy. Social origins include intra- and interspecific aggressive behavior during feeding.

Keywords

Feeding habits Lepidophagy Evolution Behavior Predation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Baskin, J.N., T.A. Zaret & F. Mago-Leccia. 1980. Feeding of reportedly parasitic catfishes (Trichomycteridae and Cetopsidae) in the Rio Portuguesa Basin, Venezuela. Biotropica 12: 182–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Breder, C.M., Jr. 1927. The fishes of the Rio Chucunaque drainage, eastern Panama. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 57: 91.176.Google Scholar
  3. Brichard, P. 1978. Fishes of Lake Tanganyika. T.F.H. Publ., Neptune City. 448 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Curio, E. 1976. The ethology of predation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 249 pp.Google Scholar
  5. DeMartini, E.E. & J.A. Coyer. 1981. Cleaning and scale-eating in juveniles of the kyphosid fishes, Hermosilla azurea and Girella nigricans. Copeia 1981: 785–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eccles, D.H. & D.S.C. Lewis. 1976. A revision of the genus Docimodus Boulenger (Pisces: Cichlidae), a group of fishes with unusual feeding habits from Lake Malawi. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 58: 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. 1970. Ethology, the biology of behavior. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York. 540 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Fryer, G., P.H. Greenwood & F. Trewavas. 1955. Scale-eating habits of African cichlid fishes. Nature 175: 1089–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fryer, G. & T.D. Iles. 1972. The cichlid fishes of the Great Lakes of Arica, their biology and evolution. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh. 641 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Géry, J. 1959. Contribution à l'étude des poissons Characoides (Ostariophysi) (II.)Roeboexodon gen.n. de Guyane, redescription deR. guyanensis (Puyo, 1948) et relations probables avec les formes voisines. Bull. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat. 31: 403–409.Google Scholar
  11. Géry, J. 1964. Poissons characoides nouveaux ou non signalés de L'ilha do Bananal. Brésil. Vie et Milieu supl. 17: 447–471.Google Scholar
  12. Géry, J. 1966., Endemic characoid fishes from the upper Rio Cauca at Cali, Colombia, Ichthyologica, The Aquarium Journal (January): 13–24.Google Scholar
  13. Géry, J. 1969. The fresh-water fishes of South America. pp. 828–848.In: E.J. Fittkau et al. (ed.) Biogeography and Ecology in South America, vol. 2, Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar
  14. Géry, J. 1972. Poisson characoides des Guyanes. I. Généralités. II. Famille des Serrasalmidae. Zool. Verhand. 1–241.Google Scholar
  15. Géry, J. 1977. Characoids of the world. T.F.H. Publ., Neptune City. 672 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Géry, J. 1980. Un nouveau poisson characoide occupant la niche des mangeurs d'écailles dans le haut rio Tapajoz, Brésil:Bryconexodon juruenae n.g.sp. Rev. fr. Aquariol. 7: 1–8.Google Scholar
  17. Gorlick, D.L. 1980. Ingestion of host fish surface mucus by the Hawaiian cleaning wrasse,Labroides phthirophagus (Labridae), and its effects on host species preference. Copeia 1980: 863–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goulding, M. 1980. The fishes and the forest: explorations in Amazonian natural history. Univ. California Press, Berkely. 280 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Greenwood, P.H. 1965. Two new species ofHaplochromis (Pisces, Cichlidae) from Lake Victoria. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. 13: 303–318.Google Scholar
  20. Hobson, E.S. 1968. Predatory behavior of some shore fishes in the Gulf of California. Res. Rep. U. S. Fish. Wildl. Serv. 73: 1–92.Google Scholar
  21. Hoese, H.D. 1966. Ectoparasitism by juvenile sea catfish,Galeichthys felis. Copeia 1966: 880–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Knöppel, H.A. 1972. Zur Nahrung tropischer Süsswasserfische aus Südamerika. Amazoniana 3: 231–246.Google Scholar
  23. Kramer, D.L. 1978. Reproductive seasonality in the fishes of a tropical stream. Ecology 59: 976–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lewis, R.W. 1970. Fish cutaneous mucus: a new source of skin surface lipids. Lipids 5: 947–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liem, K.F. & J.W.M. Osse. 1975. Biological versatility, evolution and food resource exploitation in African cichlid fishes. Amer. Zool. 15: 427–454.Google Scholar
  26. Liem, K.F. & D.J. Stewart. 1976. Evolution of the scale-eating cichlid fishes of Lake Tanganyika: a generic revision with a description of a new species. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 147: 319–350.Google Scholar
  27. Losey, G.S. 1972a. Predation protection in the poison-fang blenny,Meiacanthus atrodorsalis, and its mimics,Ecsenius bicolor andRunula laudanus (Blenniidae). Pacif. Sci. 26: 129–139.Google Scholar
  28. Losey, G.S., Jr. 1972b. The ecological importance of cleaning symbiosis. Copeia 1972: 820–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Losey, G.S., Jr. 1978. The symbiotic behavior of fishes. pp. 1–31. In: D.I. Mostofsky (ed.) The Behavior of Fish and Other Aquatic Animals, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Losey, G.S., Jr. 1979. Fish cleaning symbiosis: proximate causes of host behaviour. Anim. Behav. 27: 669–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lowe-McConnell, R.H. 1964. The fishes of the Rupununi savanna district of British Guiana, South America. Pt. 1. Ecological grouping of fish species and effects of the seasonal cycle on fish. J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.) 45: 103–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lowe-McConnell, R.H. 1975. Fish communities in tropical freshwaters. Longman, London. 337 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Machado, F.A. & I. Sazima. 1983. Feeding behavior of the blood-feeding fishBranchioica bertonii (Siluriformes, Trichomycteridae). Ci. e Cult. 34: (in press). (In Portuguese).Google Scholar
  34. Major, P.F. 1973. Scale-feeding behavior of the leatherjacket,Scomberoides lysan and two species of the genusOligoplites (Pisces: Carangidae). Copeia 1973: 151–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Markl, H. 1972. Aggression und Beuteverhalten bei Piranhas (Serrasalminae, Characidae). Z. Tierpsychol. 30: 190–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Marlier, G. & N. Leleup. 1954. A curious ecological ‘niche’ among the fishes of Lake Tanganyika. Nature 174: 935–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Menezes, N.A. 1969. Systematics and evolution of the tribe Acestrorhynchini (Pisces, Cbaracidae). Arq. Zool. S. Paulo 18: 1–150.Google Scholar
  38. Mok, H.K. 1978. Scale-feeding inTydemania navigatoris (Pisces: Triacanthodidae). Copeia 1978: 338–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Noakes, D.L.G. 1979. Parent touching behavior by young fishes: incidence, function and causation. Env. Biol. Fish. 4: 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nomura, H. 1975. The food of three species ofAstyanax Baird & Girard, 1854 (Osteichthyes, Characidae) of the Mogi Guaçu River, SP. Revta. bras. Biol. 35: 595–614. (In Portuguese).Google Scholar
  41. Roberts, T.R. 1970. Scale-eating American characoid fishes, with special reference toProbolodus heterostomus. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 38: 383–390.Google Scholar
  42. Roberts, T.R. 1972. Ecology of fishes in the Amazon and Congo basins. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 143: 117–147.Google Scholar
  43. Roberts, T.R. 1978. An ichthyological survey of the Fly River in Papua New Guinea with descriptions of new species. Smithsonian Contr. Zool. 281: 1–72.Google Scholar
  44. Sazima, I. 1977. Possible case of aggressive mimicry in a neotropical scale-eating fish. Nature 270: 510–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sazima, I. 1980. A comparative study of some scale-eating fishes (Osteichthyes). Ph. D. Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. 264 pp. (In Portuguese).Google Scholar
  46. Sazima, I. & F.A. Machado. 1982. Habits and behavior ofRoeboides prognathus, a scale-eating fish (Osteichthyes, Characoidei). Bolm. Zool. Univ. S. Paulo 7: 35–56. (In Portuguese).Google Scholar
  47. Sazima, I. & V.S. Uieda. 1980. Scale-eating behavior inOligoplites saurus and records of scale-eating inO. palometa andO. saliens (Pisces, Carangidae). Revta. bras. Biol. 40: 701–710. (In Portuguese).Google Scholar
  48. Smith-Vaniz, W.F. & J.C. Staiger. 1973. Comparative revision ofScomberoides, Oligoplites, Parona andHypacanthus with comments on the phylogenetic position ofCampogramma (Pisces: Carangidae). Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 39: 185–256.Google Scholar
  49. Trewavas, E. 1947. An example of ‘mimicry’ in fishes. Nature 160: 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van Oosten, I. 1957. The skin and scales. pp. 207–224.In: M.E. Brown (ed.) The Physiology of Fishes. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Vleira, I. & J. Géry. 1979. Differential growth and nutrition inCatoprion mento (Characoidei). Scale-eating fish of Amazonica. Acta Amazonica 9: 143–146. (In Portuguese).Google Scholar
  52. Wessler, E. & I. Werner. 1957. On the chemical composition of some mucous substances of fish. Acta Chem. Scand. 2: 1240–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Whitfield, A. K. 1979. Field observations on the lepidophagous teleostTerapon jarbua (Førskal). Env. Biol. Fish. 4: 171–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Whitfield, A.K. & S.J.M. Blaber. 1978. Scale-eating habits of the marine teleostTerapon jarbua (Førskal). J. Fish. Biol. 12: 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zaret. T.M. & A.S. Rand. 1971. Competition in tropical stream fishes: support for the competitive exclusion principle. Ecology 52: 336–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivan Sazima
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de ZoologiaUniversidade Estadual de CampinasCampinas, Sao PauloBrasil

Personalised recommendations