Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 31, Issue 10, pp 2705–2709 | Cite as

Evaluation of hot hardness and creep of a 350 grade commercial maraging steel

  • U. K. Viswanathan
  • T. R. G. Kutty
  • R. Keswani
  • C. Ganguly
Papers

Abstract

The hardening response and the indentation creep of a 350 grade commercial maraging steel were evaluated using a hot hardness tester. The hardness versus temperature plot exhibited three distinct regions. Hardness response was noted between 500–800 K. The unusually high values of activation energy and stress exponent obtained during the creep experiment could be rationalized by a novel concept of introducing a back stress term in the indentation creep relation. The corrected value of the activation energy was found to be reasonably in agreement with the activation energy for diffusion of Ni in iron. Results are supplemented with microstructural observation.

Keywords

Iron Polymer Activation Energy Distinct Region Hardness Tester 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. FLOREEN,Metall. Rev. 13 (1968) 115.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. F. DECKER,Adv. Mater. Process Inc., Metal Prog. 6 (1988) 45.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. J. RACK,Mater. Sci. Eng. 34 (1978) 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. FLOREEN and R. F. DECKER,ASM Trans. Q. 56 (1963) 403–11.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. F. HOENIE, AFML-TR-65-197, North American Aviation, (July 1965).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. MARTIN,Mater Design Eng. (December 1964) 56.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. H. WESTBROOK,Trans. Amer Soc. Metals 45 (1953) 221.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. LARSEN-BADSE, AEC Report ORNL-TM-1771 (1967).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. G. NIEH and J. WADSWORTH,Scripta Metall. 23 (1989) 1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. M. CARTER, J. L. HENSHALL and R. M. COOPER,Commun. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 71 (1988) C-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    KUMASHIRO, A. ITOH, T. KINOSHITA and M. SOBAYIMA,J. Mater. Sci. 12 (1977) 595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. E. VIGNOUL, J. K. TIEN and J. M. SANCHEZ,Mater. Sci. Eng. A 170 (1993) 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. B. RODRIGUEZ, E. P. BARTH and J. K. TIEN, in Material Research Society Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 213, Nov. 27–30, 1990, Boston, USA (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992) 539.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. A. GEACH,Int. Metall. Rev. 19 (1974) 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    W. B. LI, J. M. HENSHALL, R.M. HOOPER and K. E. EASTERLING,Acta Metall. 39 (1991) 3099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T. O. MULHELAN and D. TABOR,J. Inst. Metals 89 (1960–61) 7.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. G. ATKINS, A. SILVERIO and D. TABOR,ibid. 94 (1966) 369.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    U. K. VISWANATHAN, G. K. DEY and M. K. ASUNDI,Metal. Trans. 24A (1993) 2429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    U. K. VISWANATHAN, T. R. G. KUTTY and C. GANGULY,ibid. 24A (1993) 2653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    T. E. HOWSON, J. E. STULGSA, and J. K. TIEN,ibid. 11A (1980) 1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. P. PETROVIC and L. J. EBERT,ibid. 4A (1973) 1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. PURUSHOTHAM and J. K. TIEN,Acta Metall,26 (1978) 159.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. W. LUND and W. D. NIX,ibid. 24A (1976) 469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. E. VIGNOUL, J. M. SANCHEZ and J. K. TIEN,Mater. Res. Symp. Proc. 213 (1991) 739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    N. JAYARAMAN, PhD thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India (1978).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. K. Viswanathan
    • 1
  • T. R. G. Kutty
    • 1
  • R. Keswani
    • 1
  • C. Ganguly
    • 1
  1. 1.Radiometallurgy DivisionBhabha Atomic Research CentreBombayIndia

Personalised recommendations