Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predicting genitourinary toxicity in patients receiving cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy: a cancer and leukemia group B study

  • Original Articles
  • Cisplatin, Genitourinary Toxicity, Age-Related Toxicity, Creatinine Clearance
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Assessment of renal function prior to cisplatin chemotherapy has long been based on measurement of creatinine clearance by 24-hour urine collection (CrC meas). Estimated creatinine clearance (CrC est) as calculated from the patient's age, weight, and serum creatinine level has been suggested as an adequate surrogate for CrC meas, as it provides advantages of improved convenience, decreased cost, and possibly increased accuracy. We studied 847 patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy on Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) protocols to determine whether the CrC meas, CrC est, or serum creatinine value or the age of the patient would predict the subsequent genitourinary (GU) toxicity. Both CrC meas (P=0.001) and CrC est (P=0.02) were predictive of subsequent grade 2+GU toxicity, with CrC meas being a slightly better predictor. Patient age also influenced subsequent GU toxicity, with the risk increasing with age (P=0.0008). When patients were classified by age group and by CrC meas, distinct subgroups were identified, with differences in the risk for grade 2+GU toxicity ranging from 14% to 32%. Using a logistic model to assess the probability of grade 2+GU toxicity, we found that an age of≥60 years (P=0.005), a CrC meas value of <75 ml/min (P=0.004), and the risk characteristics of the individual cisplatin trial were important, whereas CrC est was not. Furthermore, CrC est proved to be a poor predictor of a CrC meas value of <75 ml/min, “misclassifying” nearly half of the patients to a “lower-risk” subgroup. In summary, both CrC meas and the patient's age independently provided predictive information concerning cisplatin GU toxicity. Our data support the continued clinical usefulness of determining the CrC meas value prior to the administration of cisplatin-based chemotherapy to most patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bajorin D, Bosl GJ, Fein R (1987) Phase I trial of escalating doses of cisplatin in hypertonic saline. J Clin Oncol 5: 1589

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balducci L, Parker M, Sexton W, Tantranond P (1989) Pharmacology of antineoplastic agents in the elderly patient. Semin Oncol 16: 76

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blachley JD, Hill JB (1981) Renal and electrolyte disturbances associated with cisplatin. Ann Intern Med 95: 628

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chambers JT, Chambers SK, Schwartz PE (1990) Correlation between measured creatinine clearance and calculated creatinine clearance in ovarian cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 36: 66

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cockroft DW, Gault MH (1976) Prediction of creatinine clearance from a serum creatinine. Nephron 16: 31

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davila E, Gardner LB (1987) Clinical value of the creatinine clearance before the administration of chemotherapy with cisplatin. Cancer 60: 161

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hrushesky WJM, Shimp W, Kennedy BJ (1984) Lack of age-dependent cisplatin nephrotoxicity. Am J Med 76: 579

    Google Scholar 

  8. Humes HD, Weinberg JM (1986) Toxic nephropathies. In: Brenner BM, Rector FC (eds) The kidney, 3rd edn. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 1491

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ignoffo R, McCauley D, Winter M (1988) Estimation of creatinine clearance in cancer patients with cost considerations.Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 7: 67

    Google Scholar 

  10. McDermott DF, Galindo A, Sherman RL, Jaffe EA, Coleman M, Pasmantier MW (1987) Inadequacy of predicted creatinine clearance as guide tochemotherapy. Cancer Treat Rep 71: 1067

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meijer S, Sleijer DT, Mulder NH, Sluiter WJ, Marrink J, Koops HS, Brouwers TM, Oldhoff J, Van der Hem GK, Mandema E (1983) Some effects of combination chemotherapy with cis-platinum on renal function in patients with nonseminomatous testicular carcinoma. Cancer 51: 2035

    Google Scholar 

  12. Philip T, Chauvin F, Armitage J, Bron D, Hagenbeek A, Biron P, Spitzer G, Velasquez W, Weisenburger DD, Fernandez-Ranada J, Somers R, Rizzoli V, Harousseau JL, Sotto JJ, Cahn JY, Guilhot F, Biggs J,Sonneveld P, Misset JL, Manna A, Jagannath S, Guglielmi C, Chevreau C, Delmer A, Santini G,Coiffier B (1991) Parma international protocol: pilot study of DHAP followed by involvedfield radiotherapy and BEAC with autologous bone marrow transplantation. Blood 77: 1587

    Google Scholar 

  13. Preusser P, Wilke H, Achterrath W, Fink U, Lenaz L, Heinicke A, Meyer H-J, Buente H (1989) Phase II study with the combination etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced measurable gastric cancer.J Clin Oncol 7: 1310

    Google Scholar 

  14. Propert KJ, Hargis JB, Weiss RB, Van Echo DA (1989) Estimated or measured creatinine clearance: an example of the misuse of correlation in medical research (abstract). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 8: 341

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ries F, Klastersky J (1986) Nephrotoxicity induced by chemotherapy with special emphasis on cisplatin toxicity. Am J Kidney Dis 8: 368

    Google Scholar 

  16. Salazar DE, Corcoran GB (1988) Predicting creatinine clearance and renal drug clearance in obese patients from estimated fat-free body mass.Am J Med 84: 1053

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sledge GW, Loehrer PJ, Roth BJ, Einhorn LH (1988) Cisplatin as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 6: 1811

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study is supported by the following NIH grants: CA 26806, CA 33601, CA 11789, CA 31983, USA

The opinions or assertations contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense of the United States of America

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hargis, J.B., Anderson, J.R., Propert, K.J. et al. Predicting genitourinary toxicity in patients receiving cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy: a cancer and leukemia group B study. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 30, 291–296 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00686298

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00686298

Keywords

Navigation