Advertisement

Journal of Comparative Physiology B

, Volume 154, Issue 6, pp 579–585 | Cite as

Response to simultaneous dehydration and thermal stress in three species of Puerto Rican frogs

  • Carol A. Beuchat
  • F. Harvey Pough
  • Margaret M. Stewart
Article

Summary

The response to simultaneous temperature and dehydration stress was examined in three species of Puerto Rican frogs.Eleutherodactylus antillensis is found primarily in hot, arid grasslands at low altitudes.Eleutherodactylus portoricensis is restricted to cool, forested montane habitats above 300 m.Eleutherodactylus coqui occurs in both the lowlands and the highlands. The physiological tolerance of the frogs to temperature was measured at 20, 25, and 30°C at various levels of dehydration using an index derived from jumping performance. Although jump distance of fully hydratedE. antillensis was unaffected by temperature, this species tolerated significantly more dehydration at high temperatures than low.Eleutherodactylus portoricensis died at 30°C, but in this species both distance jumped and dehydration tolerance were unaffected by lower temperatures. Distance jumped byE. coqui increased with increasing temperature, but tolerance of dehydration remained unchanged.Eleutherodactylus coqui was less tolerant of high temperatures thanE. antillensis but more tolerant thanE. portoricensis.

Keywords

Human Physiology Thermal Stress Dehydration Tolerance Forested Montane Dehydration Stress 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Abbreviations

DT

dehydration tolerance

SVL

snout vent length

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bennett AF, Licht P (1973) Relative contributions of anaerobic and aerobic energy production during activity in Amphibia. J Comp Physiol 87:351–360Google Scholar
  2. Bennett AF, Licht P (1974) Anaerobic metabolism during activity in amphibians. Comp Biochem Physiol 48A:319–327Google Scholar
  3. Blem CR, Steiner JW, Miller MA (1978) Comparison of jumping abilities of the cricket frogsAcris gryllus andAcris crepitans. Herpetologica 34:288–291Google Scholar
  4. Brattstrom BH, Lawrence P (1962) The rate of thermal acclimation in anuran amphibians. Physiol Zool 35:148–156Google Scholar
  5. Briscoe CB (1966) Weather in the Luquillo Mountains of Puerto Rico. US Institute of Tropical Forestry Research Paper Number 3. Rio Piedras, Puerto RicoGoogle Scholar
  6. Claussen DL (1974) Water balance and jumping ability in anuran amphibians. Am Zool 14:1257Google Scholar
  7. Dunlap DG (1969) Influence of temperature and duration of acclimation, time of day, sex and body weight on metabolic rates in the hylid frog,Acris crepitans. Comp Biochem Physiol 31:555–570Google Scholar
  8. Emerson SB (1978) Allometry and jumping in frogs: helping the twain to meet. Evolution 32:551–564Google Scholar
  9. Ewel JJ, Whitmore JL (1973) The ecological life zones of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. US Institute of Tropical Forestry Research Paper No. 18. Rio Piedras, Puerto RicoGoogle Scholar
  10. Farrell MP, MacMahon JA (1969) An ecophysiological study of water economy in eight species of tree frogs (Hylidae). Herpetologica 25:279–294Google Scholar
  11. Formanowicz DR Jr., Stewart, MM, Townsend K, Pough FH, Brussard PF (1981) Predation by giant crab spiders on the Puerto Rican frogEleutherodactylus coqui. Herpetologica 37:125–129Google Scholar
  12. Gans C, Parsons T (1966) On the origin of the jumping mechanism in frogs. Evolution 20:92–99Google Scholar
  13. Gans C, Rosenberg HI (1966) Numerical analysis of frog jumping. Herpetologica 22:209–213Google Scholar
  14. Heatwole H, Torres F, DeAustin SB, Heatwole A (1969) Studies on anuran water balance. I. Dynamics of evaporative water loss by the coqui,Eleutherodactylus portoricensis. Comp Biochem Physiol 28:245–269Google Scholar
  15. Hillman SS (1978) The roles of oxygen delivery and electrolyte levels in the dehydrational death ofXenopus laevis. J Comp Physiol 128:169–175Google Scholar
  16. Huey RB (1975) Ecology of lizard thermoregulation. PhD Thesis, Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. Huey RB, Stevenson RD (1979) Integrating thermal physiology and ecology of ectotherms: a discussion of approaches. Am Zool 19:357–366Google Scholar
  18. Hutchison VH, Miller K (1979) Anaerobic capacity of amphibians. Comp Biochem Physiol 63A:213–216Google Scholar
  19. Jameson DL (1966) Rate of weight loss of tree frogs at various temperatures and humidities. Ecology 47:605–613Google Scholar
  20. Kour EL, Hutchison VH (1970) Critical thermal tolerances and heating and cooling rates of lizards from diverse habitats. Copeia 1970:219–229Google Scholar
  21. Levins R (1969) Thermal acclimation and heat resistance inDrosophila species. Am Nat 103:483–499Google Scholar
  22. Licht P (1964) A comparative study of the thermal dependence of contractility in saurian skeltal muscle. Comp Biochem Physiol 13:27–34Google Scholar
  23. Licht P, Dawson WR, Shoemaker VH (1969) Thermal adjustments in cardiac and skeletal muscles of lizards. Z Vgl Physiol 65:1–14Google Scholar
  24. Main AR, Bentley PJ (1964) Water relations of Australian burrowing frogs and tree frogs. Ecology 45:379–382Google Scholar
  25. Nevo E (1973) Adaptive variation in size of cricket frogs. Ecology 54:1271–1281Google Scholar
  26. Pough FH, Taigen TL, Stewart MM, Brussard PF (1983) Behavioral modification of evaporative water loss by a Puerto Rican frog. Ecology 64:244–254Google Scholar
  27. Ralin DB (1981) Ecophysiological adaptation in a diploid-tetraploid complex of treefrogs (Hylidae). Comp Biochem Physiol 68A:175–179Google Scholar
  28. Ralin DB, Rogers JS (1972) Aspects of tolerance to desiccation inAcris crepitans andPseudacris streckeri. Copeia 1972:519–525Google Scholar
  29. Rand AS (1952) Jumping ability of certain anurans, with notes on endurance. Copeia 1952:15–20Google Scholar
  30. Rand AS, Rand PJ (1966) The relation of size and distance jumped inBufo marinus. Herpetologica 22:206–209Google Scholar
  31. Ruibal R (1962) The adaptive value of bladder water in the toad,Bufo cognatus. Physiol Zool 35:218–223Google Scholar
  32. Schmid WB (1965) Some aspects of the water economies of nine species of amphibians. Ecology 46:261–269Google Scholar
  33. Smith MH, Straney DO (1981) Biochemical similarities among Puerto RicanEleutherodactylus. Copeia 1981:463–466Google Scholar
  34. Snyder GK, Weathers WW (1975) Temperature adaptations in amphibians. Am Nat 109:92–101Google Scholar
  35. Stokely PS, Berberian JF (1953) On the jumping ability of frogs. Copeia 1953:187Google Scholar
  36. Thomas R (1966) New species of AntilleanEleutherodactylus. Q J Fla Acad Sci 28:375–391Google Scholar
  37. Thorson TB (1955) The relationship of water economy to terrestrialism in amphibians. Ecology 36:100–116Google Scholar
  38. Thorson T, Svihla A (1943) Correlation of the habitats of amphibians with their ability to survive loss of body water. Ecology 24:374–381Google Scholar
  39. Tracy CR (1976) A model of the dynamic exchanges of water and energy between a terrestrial amphibian and its environment. Ecol Monogr 46:293–326Google Scholar
  40. Tracy CR (1978) Further thoughts on anuran thermoregulation: discussion. In: Burtt EH Jr (ed) The behavioral significance of color. Garland STPM Press, New York pp 63–68Google Scholar
  41. Twain M (1929) The celebrated jumping frog of Calaveras County. In: Sketches new and old. Harper and Brothers, New York LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. van Berkum F, Pough FH, Stewart MM, Brussard PF (1982) Altitudinal and interspecific differences in the rehydration abilities of Puerto Rican frogs (Eleutherodactylus). Physiol Zool 55:130–136Google Scholar
  43. Zug GR (1972) Anuran locomotion: structure and function. I. Preliminary observations on relation between jumping and osteometrics of appendicular and postaxial skeleton. Copeia 1972:613–624Google Scholar
  44. Zug GR (1978) Anuran locomotion—structure and function, 2: Jumping performance of semiaquatic, terrestrial, and arboreal frogs. Smithson Contrib Zool 276:1–31Google Scholar
  45. Zug GR, Altig R (1978) Anuran locomotion—structure and function: the jumping forces of frogs. J Wash Acad Sci 68:144–147Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol A. Beuchat
    • 1
  • F. Harvey Pough
    • 1
  • Margaret M. Stewart
    • 2
  1. 1.Section of Ecology and SystematicsCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesState University of New York at AlbanyAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations