Journal of Comparative Physiology B

, Volume 154, Issue 6, pp 573–578 | Cite as

Role of the CNS in the control of the water economy of the toadBufo arenarum Hensel

III. Skin permeability increases to raised osmotic pressure of the external ‘milieu’
  • Enrique T. Segura
  • Juan C. Reboreda
  • Armando Skorka
  • María E. Cuello
  • Silvia Petriella


  1. 1.

    The water uptake (WU), urine production (U), overall water balance (WB) and body weight variations (bwv) were measured in normal (N) as well as in totally hypophysectomized, retrochiasmatic sectioned, infundibulum lesioned (HR) toads. Groups of animals were studied while adapted to tap water and during immersion in sucrose solutions of different concentrations (46, 92, 138, 220 and 230 mM). Subsequently the rate of water uptake (Jw) and the osmotic permeability coefficient (LPD) were calculated. Also the effect on these variables of the subcutaneous administration of a non-competitive α-blocker (Phenoxybenzamine: POB) was tested.

  2. 2.

    No correlation was found in normal controls between the osmotic pressure outside and WU, U, WB, bwv orJw.Jw remained relatively stable from 46 to 184 mOsm of external osmotic pressure, apparently due to a compensatory increase of LPD in the same group.

  3. 3.

    At a higher concentration of the external environment (220 mM) a drastic increase inLPD was observed in normal animals but the effect was markedly attenuated in HR animals.

  4. 4.

    Alpha-adrenergic blockade with POB induced a significant and almost constant increase in WU, WB andJw in normal animals in solutions up to 138 mM sucrose. These effects ceased when the external concentration reached 170 mM. A concomitant and stable increment inLPD was also observed. These values provide an indirect estimate of the adrenergic factor controlling water movements across the skin of the toad in vivo (Segura et al. 1982b), which appear to be osmotically independent within this range. The copious increase in WU due to adrenergic blockade was unaffected by amiloride (10−4 M), so water transport cannot be linked with sodium transport.

  5. 5.

    The present results appear to establish that: (a) Permeability of the skin to water is related to the osmolarity of the external environment in the normal toad; (b) hypothalamic-hypophyseal mechanisms seem only in part to account for this responsiveness; (c) normal toads are able to compensate in some degree for the reduction in water uptake caused by an increase in the osmolarity of the external environment by an increase in the osmotic permeability of the skin.



Water Uptake Water Balance Osmotic Pressure External Environment Amiloride 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



water uptake


urine production


overall water balance


body weight variations


influx of water


osmotic permeability coefficient


normal (control) toads


hypophysectomized retrochiasmatic sectioned, infundibulum lesioned toads




Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barker Jørgensen C (1950) The amphibian wate economy with special regard to the effect of neurohypophyseal extracts. Acta Physiol Scand 22; Suppl 78:1–79Google Scholar
  2. Benedictis EM, Lacaz-Vieira F (1982) Electrolytes control flows of water across the apical barrier in toad skin: the hydrosmotic salt effect. Membrane Biol 67:125–135Google Scholar
  3. Bentley PJ (1957) The effects of vasopressin on water uptake of the toad,Bufo marinus, while bathed in different hypotonic solutions. J Endocrinol 16:126–134Google Scholar
  4. De Sousa RC, Grosso A (1982) Osmotic water flow across the abdominal skin of the toadBufo marinus: effect of vasopressin and isoprenaline. J Physiol (London) 329:281–296Google Scholar
  5. Dicker SE, Elliot AB (1967) Water uptake byBufo melanostictus as affected by osmotic gradients, vasopressin and temperature. J Physiol (London) 190:359–370Google Scholar
  6. Gallardo R, Pang PKT, Sawyer WH (1980) Neural influences on bullfrog renal functions. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 165:233–240Google Scholar
  7. Kedem O, Katchalsky A (1958) Thermodynamic analysis of the permeability of biological membranes to non-electrolytes. Biochem Biophys Acta 27:229–246Google Scholar
  8. Pang PKT, Uchiyama M, Sawyer WH (1982) Endocrine and neural control of amphibian renal functions. Fed Proc 41:2365–2370Google Scholar
  9. Rey P (1937) Recherches expérimentales sur l'économie de l'eau chez les batraciens. Diss Paris (quoted by Barker Jørgensen C 1950)Google Scholar
  10. Schmajuk NA, Segura ET (1982) Behavioral regulation of water balance in the toadBufo arenarum. Herpetologica 38:296–301Google Scholar
  11. Segura ET, Bandsholm UC, Bronstein A (1980) Neural control of water intake across the skin of the toad. VIIth Int Conf Physiol Food and Fluid Intake, “IUPS”, Warsaw, July 7–10, 1980, Volume of Abstracts, p 101Google Scholar
  12. Segura ET, Bandsholm UC, Bronstein A, Woscoboinik D (1982a) Role of the CNS in the control of the water economy of the toadBufo arenarum Hensel. I. Effects of handling, brain lesions, anesthesia and reversible coma upon water uptake, urine production and overall water balance. J Comp Physiol 146:95–100Google Scholar
  13. Segura ET, Bandsholm UC, Bronstein A (1982b) Role of the CNS in the control of the water economy of the toadBufo arenarum Hensel. II. Adrenergic control of water uptake across the skin. J Comp Physiol 146:101–106Google Scholar
  14. Shoemaker VH, Nagy KA (1977) Osmoregulation in amphibians and reptiles. Annu Rev Physiol 39:449–471Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrique T. Segura
    • 1
  • Juan C. Reboreda
    • 1
  • Armando Skorka
    • 1
  • María E. Cuello
    • 1
  • Silvia Petriella
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratorio de Fisiología del ComportamientoInstituto de Biología y Medicina ExperimentalBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations