Solar Physics

, Volume 154, Issue 2, pp 275–308 | Cite as

Temperature and emission measure from goes soft X-ray measurements

  • Howard A. Garcia


GOES (Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite) X-ray sensors observe the Sun continuously in two broadband soft X-ray channels. These data are collected in real time and are used operationally to detect the onset and the intensity of solar flares. For these purposes it is usually sufficient to monitor only the soft channel (1–8 Å). The second, harder channel (0.5–4 Å) provides additional information on the state of the coronal plasma. The dual X-ray measurement data are archived and made available to external users for basic research.

The GOES X-ray sensors operate on the ion-chamber principle: measured ion-chamber electric current is proportional to the net ionization rate caused by incident X-ray flux on encapsulated noble gases. The ratio of the outputs of the two channels in electric current, therefore, is uniquely a function of the color temperature of the emitting plasma, and the magnitude of each of the currents is proportional to a quantity, known as the emission measure, that convolves the volume and the density of the emitting plasma.

This paper provides a detailed description of the procedure used for computing color temperature and emission measure from GOES X-ray data, including a table of constants for SMS and GOES X-ray sensors that are necessary for reducing the archived data from these satellites. Temperature and theoretical current tables were constructed, for individual GOES sensors, from laboratory calibrations of instrument responses and from synthetic solar X-ray spectra generated by two models of solar thermal X-ray emission: Raymond-Smith and Mewe-Alkemade. Example tables are shown and others are available on request.

Errors that may be incurred from the use of GOES X-ray data in the computation of flare temperatures and emission measures may be classified under four major groups: instrumentinduced errors, including errors of calibration and random measurement errors; environmentally induced errors, due primarily to the ambient energetic electron background; solar influences, including the consequences of the isothermal assumption and the single-source assumption; and uncertainties in the modelled solar synthetic spectrum. These error sources are discussed separately, and a rough estimation of the collective error is made where this is quantitatively feasible. Finally, temperatures and emission measures are computed from GOES data and are compared with those derived from SMM andHinotori soft X-ray spectrometer data and from broadband photometric data from the PROGNOZ satellite.


Flare Emission Measure Color Temperature Synthetic Spectrum Random Measurement Error 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Antonucci, E., Gabriel, A. H., and Dennis, B. R.: 1984,Astrophys. J. 287, 917.Google Scholar
  2. Bornmann, P. L.: 1990,Astrophys. J. 356, 733.Google Scholar
  3. Craig, I. J. D. and Brown, S. C.: 1976,Astron. Astrophys. 49, 239.Google Scholar
  4. Culhane, F. L.: 1969,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 144, 375.Google Scholar
  5. Culhane, F. L. and Acton, L. W.: 1970,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 151, 141.Google Scholar
  6. Donnelly, R. F. and Unzicker, A.: 1974, NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL SEL-31.Google Scholar
  7. Donnelly, R. F., Grubb, R. N., and Cowley, F. C.: 1977, NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL SEL-48.Google Scholar
  8. Garcia, H. A.: 1985, NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL SEL-72.Google Scholar
  9. Garcia, H. A.: 1994, in preparation.Google Scholar
  10. Garcia, H. A., and Fárník, F.: 1992,Solar Phys. 141, 127.Google Scholar
  11. Garcia, H. A. and McIntosh, P. S.: 1992,Solar Phys. 141, 109.Google Scholar
  12. Grubb, R.N.: 1975, NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL SEL-42.Google Scholar
  13. Kahler, S. W.: 1991,Solar Phys. 133, 371.Google Scholar
  14. Mewe, R.: 1972,Solar Phys. 22, 459.Google Scholar
  15. Mewe, R., Gronenschild, E. H. B. M., and van den Oord, G. H. J.: 1985,Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 62, 197.Google Scholar
  16. Mewe, R., Lemen, J. R., and van den Oord, G. H. J.: 1986,Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 65, 511.Google Scholar
  17. Panametrics, Inc.: 1978,Panametrics Report PANA GOES X-SR-1, Waltham, MA.Google Scholar
  18. Panametrics, Inc.: 1987,Panametrics Report PANA-NOAA-1, Waltham, MA.Google Scholar
  19. Rosner, R., Tucker, W. H., and Vaiana, G. S.: 1978,Astrophys. J. 220, 643.Google Scholar
  20. Švestka, Z.: 1976,Solar Flares, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland.Google Scholar
  21. Tanaka, K.: 1986,Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 38, 225.Google Scholar
  22. Thomas, R. J., Starr, R., and Crannell, C. J.: 1985,Solar Phys. 95, 323.Google Scholar
  23. Tucker, W. H. and Koren, M.: 1971,Astrophys. J. 168, 283.Google Scholar
  24. Vaiana, G., S., Krieger, A. J., and Timothy, A. F.: 1973,Solar Phys. 32, 81.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Howard A. Garcia
    • 1
  1. 1.NOAA Space Environment LaboratoryBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations