Marine Biology

, Volume 120, Issue 3, pp 479–489 | Cite as

Seasonal growth and biomass of the subtropical seagrassHalodule wrightii in relation to continuous measurements of underwater irradiance

  • K. H. Dunton
Article

Abstract

Continuous year-round measurements of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) were collected in relation to leaf elongation and plant biomass in the shoal-grass,Halodule wrightii Aschers., within three different estuarine systems on the south Texas coast (Laguna Madre: May 1989 to September 1993; Corpus Christi Bay: February 1990 to September 1993; San Antonio Bay; May 1990 to April 1991). Large differences in water transparency at all three sites masked seasonal variations in surface insolation as reflected in average diffuse attenuation coefficient (k) values ranging from 0.7 to 2.9 and differences in the maximum depth penetration ofH. wrightii, which varied from 0.6 to about 1.3 m. The continuous presence of a chrysophyte (brown tide) algal bloom in Laguna Madre since 1990 led to significant decreases in spring leaf elongation rates and a nearly 50% decline in below-ground biomass, which was reflected in root:shoot ratio (RSR) values that declined from 5.4 in 1989 to 2.3 in 1992. Increased turbidity and lower light levels in San Antonio Bay also corresponded with diminished plant biomass and the subsequent loss of plants; at both locations, the annual quantum flux ranged from 2200 to 2400 mol m-2yr-1, or about 18% of surface irradiance (SI). In contrast,H. wrightii populations growing at ca.1.2 m depths and characterized by high RSR values (≥4.0) were exposed to 5100 to 5700 mol m-2yr-1, or about 41 to 46% SI. Under these conditions, plants were exposed to daily saturating levels of PAR (Hsat) of 3 to 8 h during the spring/summer period of maximum growth, compared to an average of 2 h in Laguna Madre (after 1990) and San Antonio Bay based on field-derived measurements of photosynthetic parameters. Leaf elongation inH. wrightii exhibited a clear circannual rhythm at all sites, regardless of underwater light levels and therefore was not a sensitive indicator of light stress. Instead, chronic long-term reductions in underwater PAR were most strongly reflected in total plant biomass. The higher light demand (18% SI) forH. wrightii in relation to many other seagrasses (11% SI; Duarte 1991) may be related to its higher photosynthetic light requirement, but may also reflect the different methods used to evaluate the minimum light requirements of seagrasses. In estuarine and coastal waters, which are characterized by large and unpredictable variations in water transparency, continuous measurements of in situ PAR are invaluable in assessing the growth and photosynthetic response of seagrasses to variations in underwater irradiance.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Campbell JW, Aarup T (1989) Photosynthetically available radiation at high latitudes. Limnol Oceanogr 34:1490–1499Google Scholar
  2. Chapman ARO, Lindley JE (1980) Seasonal growth ofLaminaria solidungula in the Canadian High Arctic in relation to irradiance and dissolved nutrient concentrations. Mar Biol 57:1–5Google Scholar
  3. Czerny AB (1994) Growth and photosynthetic responses of two subtropical seagrasses,Thalassia testudinum andHalodule wrightii to in situ manipulations of irradiance. Master's thesis, Department of Marine Science, The University of Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar
  4. Dean TA (1985) The temporal and spatial distribution of underwater quantum irradiation in a southern California kelp forest. Estua cstl Shelf Sci 21:835–844Google Scholar
  5. Dennison WC, Alberte RS (1982) Photosynthetic responses ofZostera marina L. (Eelgrass) to in situ manipulations of light intensity. Oecologia 55:137–144Google Scholar
  6. Dennison WC, Alberte RS (1985) Role of daily light period in the depth distribution ofZostera marina (eelgrass). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 25:51–61Google Scholar
  7. Dennison WC, Orth RJ, Moore KA, Stevenson JC, Carter V, Kollar S, Bergstrom PW, Batiuk RA (1983) Assessing water quality with submersed aquatic vegetation. BioSci 43:86–94Google Scholar
  8. Drew EA (1979) Physiological aspects of primary production in seagrasses. Aquat Bot 7:139–150Google Scholar
  9. Duarte CM (1991) Seagrass depth limits. Aquat Bot 40:363–377Google Scholar
  10. Dunton K (1990a) Growth and production inLaminaria solidungula: relation to continuous underwater light levels in the Alaskan High Arctic. Mar Biol 106:297–304Google Scholar
  11. Dunton KH (1990b) Production ecology ofRuppia maritima L. s.l. andHalodule wrightii Aschers. in two subtropical estuaries. J exp mar Biol Ecol 143:147–164Google Scholar
  12. Dunton KH, Tomasko DA (1994) In situ photosynthesis in the seagrassHalodule wrightii in a hypersaline subtropical lagoon. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 107:281–293Google Scholar
  13. Fourqurean JW, Zieman JC (1991) Photosynthesis, respiration and whole plant carbon budget of the seagrassThalassia testudinum. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 69:161–170Google Scholar
  14. Gwinner E (1989) Photoperiod as a modifying and limiting factor in the expression of avian circannual rhythms. J biol Rhythms 4:237–250Google Scholar
  15. Hedgpeth JW (1947) The Laguna Madre of Texas. Trans. 12th N Am Wildl Conf 12:364–380Google Scholar
  16. Jacobs RPWM (1979) Distribution and aspects of the production and biomass of eelgrass,Zostera marina L., at Roscoff, France. Aquat Bot 7:151–172Google Scholar
  17. Kentula ME (1983) Production dynamics of aZostera marina L. bed in Netarts Bay, Oregon. Ph.D. thesis, Oregon State University, CorvallisGoogle Scholar
  18. Kenworthy WJ, Haunert DE (1991) The light requirements of seagrass: proceedings of a workshop to examine the capability of water quality criteria, standards and monitoring programs to protect seagrasses. NOAA tech Memo US Dep Commerce NMFS-SERC-287Google Scholar
  19. Kirk JTO (1983) Light and photosynthesis in aquatic ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Libes M (1986) Productivity-irradiance relationship ofPosidonia oceanica and its epiphytes. Aquat Bot 26:285–306Google Scholar
  21. Lindeboom HJ, Sandee AJJ (1989) Production and consumption of tropical seagrass fields in eastern Indonesia measured with bell jars and microelectrodes. Neth J Sea Res 23:181–190Google Scholar
  22. Lüning K (1991) Circannual growth rhythm in a brown alga,Pterygophopra californica. Bot Acta 104: 157–162Google Scholar
  23. Lüning K, Dring MJ (1979) Continuous underwater light measurement near Helgoland (North Sea) and its significance for characteristic light limits in the sublittoral region. Helgoländer wiss Meeresunters 32:403–424Google Scholar
  24. Lüning K, Kadel P (1993) Daylength range for circannual rhythmicity inPterygophora california (Alariaceae, Phaephyta) and synchronization of seasonal growth by daylength cycles in several other brown algae. Phycologia 32(5):379–387Google Scholar
  25. Markager S, Sand-Jensen K (1992) Light requirements and depth zonation of marine macroalgae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 88:83–92Google Scholar
  26. Marsh JA, Dennison WC, Alberte RS (1986) Effects of temperature on photosynthesis and respiration in eelgrass (Zostera marina L.). J exp mar Biol Ecol 101: 257–267Google Scholar
  27. McPherson BF, Miller RL (1987) The vertical attenuation of light in Charlotte Harbor, a shallow, subtropical estuary, south-western Florida. Estuar cstl Shelf Sci 25:721–737Google Scholar
  28. Megard RO, Berman T (1989) Effects of algae on the Secchi transparency of the southeastern Mediterranea Sea. Limnol Oceanogr 34:1640–1655Google Scholar
  29. Olesen B, Sand-Jensen K (1993) Seasonal acclimatization of eelgrassZostera marina growth to light. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 94:91–99Google Scholar
  30. Onuf CP (1994) Seagrasses, dredging, and light in Laguna Madre, Texas, USA. Estuar cstl Shelf Sci (in press)Google Scholar
  31. Orth RJ, Moore KA (1988) Distribution ofZostera marina L. andRuppia maritima L. sensu lato along depth gradients in the lower Chesapeake Bay, U.S.A. Aquat Bot 32:291–305Google Scholar
  32. Ott JA (1979) Persistence of a seasonal growth rhythm inPosidonia oceanica (L.) Delile under constant conditions of temperature and illumination. Mar Biol Lett 1:99–104Google Scholar
  33. Pérez M, Romero J (1992) Photosynthetic response to light and temperature of the seagrassCymodocea nodosa and the prediction of its seasonality. Aquat Biot 43:51–62Google Scholar
  34. Preisendorfer RW (1986) Secchi disk science: visual optics of natural waters. Limnol Oceanogr 31:909–926Google Scholar
  35. Pulich WM, White WA (1991) Decline of submerged vegetation in the Galveston Bay system: chronology and relationship to physical processes. J cstl Res 7:1125–1138Google Scholar
  36. Quammen ML, Onuf CP (1993) Laguna madre: seagrass changes continue decades after salinity reduction. Estuaries 16:302–310Google Scholar
  37. Sand-Jensen K (1975) Biomass, net production and growth dynamics in an eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) population in Vellerup Vig, Denmark. Ophelia 14:185–201Google Scholar
  38. SAS Institute Inc. (1987) SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, version 6 edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  39. Spruyt E, Verbelen J-P, De Greef JA (1987) Expression of circaseptan and circannual rhythmicity in the inhibition of bean seeds. Pl Physiol 84:707–710Google Scholar
  40. Stockwell DA, Buskey EJ, Whitledge TE (1993) Studies on conditions conductive to the development and maintenance of a persistent “brown tide” in Laguna Madre, Texas. In: Smayda TJ, Shimizu Y (eds) Toxic phytoplankton blooms in the sea Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, pp 693–698Google Scholar
  41. Virnstein RW (1982) Leaf growth rate of the seagrassHalodule wrightii photographically measured in situ. Aquat bot 12:209–218Google Scholar
  42. Wetzel RL, Neckles HA (1986) A model ofZostera marina L. photosynthesis and growth: simulated effects of selected physicalchemical variables and biological interactions. Aquat Bot 26:307–323Google Scholar
  43. Wetzel RL, Penhale PA (1983) Production ecology of seagrass communities in the lower Chesapeake Bay. Mar Techn Soc J 17:22–31Google Scholar
  44. Zieman JC, Wetzel RG (1980) Productivity in seagrass: methods and rates. In: Phillips RC, McRoy CP (eds) Handbook of seagrass biology. Garland STPM Press, New York, pp 87–116Google Scholar
  45. Zimmerman RC, Cabello-Pasini A, Alberte RS (1994) Modeling daily carbon gain of aquatic macrophytes from quantum flux measurements: a comparative analysis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser (in press)Google Scholar
  46. Zimmerman RC, Reguzzoni JL, Wyllie-Echeverria S, Josselyn M, Alberte RS (1991) Assessment of environmental suitability for growth ofZostera marina L. (eelgrass) in San Francisco Bay. Aquat Bot 39:353–366Google Scholar
  47. Zimmerman RC, Smith RD, Alberte RS (1989) Thermal acclimation and whole-plant carbon balance inZostera marina L. (ellgrass). J exp mar Biol Exol 130:93–109Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. H. Dunton
    • 1
  1. 1.Marine Science InstituteThe University of Texas at AustinPort AransasUSA

Personalised recommendations