Marine Biology

, Volume 120, Issue 3, pp 467–478 | Cite as

Biogeography of toxic dinoflagellates in the genusAlexandrium from the northeastern United States and Canada

  • D. M. Anderson
  • D. M. Kulis
  • G. J. Doucette
  • J. C. Gallagher
  • E. Balech
Article

Abstract

Twenty-eight strains of toxic dinoflagellates in the genusAlexandrium from the northeastern United States and Canada were characterized on the basis of morphology, bioluminescence capacity, mating compatibility, and toxin composition. The distributions of these characters were evaluated in the context of regional patterns of paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) and coastal hydrography. Two morphospecies were identified-A. tamarense Lebour andA. fundyense Balech. The two are interspersed geographically though there are areas, such as the Gulf of Maine, where apparently onlyA. fundyense occurs. Southern waters (Cape Cod, Connecticut, and Long Island) have especially diverse populations. The two species are sexually compatible. Virtually all northern isolates are bioluminescent, whereas southern isolates include bioluminescent and non-bioluminescent strains. Cluster analyses, based on high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) determinations of the suite of toxins produced by each isolate, revealed two and perhaps three distinct groups. One is comprised almost exclusively of northern strains, and the other of southern strains. A Cape Cod cluster may be separable from the southern group. These analyses explain a previously reported north-to-south trend of decreasing toxicity, as the northern isolates produce greater proportions of the more potent toxins than do southern forms. The overall perspective is that the biogeography of toxicAlexandrium spp. in the study region is not that of a single, widespread, homogeneous population, but rather is comprised of several sub-populations, each with its own physiological characteristics and history. Two scenarios are considered with respect to this regional biogeography. The first invokes recent and continuing dispersal of isolates to the south from a center of origin in the north, followed by recombination and strong selection. The second holds that the northern and southern populations diverged from a common ancestor (vicariance), but now represent localized populations with little mixing of genotypes. Neither hypothesis can be completely refuted by the data presented here, though the weight of the evidence favors the latter. The correct scenario may be a combination of both, with recent and continuous speading occuring within the Gulf of Maine and perphaps the Gulf of St. Laerence, but with endemic localized populations persisting without genetic exchange in most southern locations. These data also indicate that although morphological criteria separate toxicAlexandrim isolates from the study region into two morphospecies, these assignments do not coincide with clusterings based on toxin composition or allozyme electrophoresis, and they are further violated by mating results. A revision of taxon designations to the varietal level could be justified.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson DM, Keafer BA (1987) An endogenous annual clock in the toxic marine dinoflagellateGonyaulax tamarensis. Nature NY 325:616–617Google Scholar
  2. Anderson DM, Kulis DM, Orphanos JA, Ceurvels AR (1982) Distribution of the toxic red tide dinoflagellateGonyaulax tamarensis in the southern New England region. Estuar cstl Shelf Sci 14:447–458Google Scholar
  3. Anderson DM, Wall D (1978) The potential importance of benthic cysts ofGonyaulax tamarensis andGonyaulax excavata in initiating toxic dinoflagellate blooms. J Physiol 14:224–234Google Scholar
  4. Balech E (1985) The genusAlexandrium orGonyaulax of thetamarensis group. In: Anderson DM, White AW, Baden DG (eds) Toxic dinoflagellates. Elsevier, New York, pp 33–38Google Scholar
  5. Beam CA, Himes M (1982) Distribution of members of theCrypthecondinium cohnii (Dinophyceae) species complex. J Protozool 29:8–15Google Scholar
  6. Brand LE (1991) Review of genetic variation in marine phytoplankton species and the ecological implications. Biol Oceanogr (NY) 6:397–409Google Scholar
  7. Cembella AD, Sullivan JJ, Boyer GL, Taylor FJR, Anderson RJ (1987) Variation in paralytic shellfish toxin composition within theProtogonyaulax tamarensis/catenella species complex: red tide dinoflagellates. Biochem Syst Ecol 15:171–186Google Scholar
  8. Cembella AD, Taylor FJR (1986) Electrophoretic variability within theProtogonyaulax tamarensis/catenella species complex: pyridine linked dehydrogenases. Biochem Syst Ecol 14: 311–321Google Scholar
  9. Cebella AD, Therriault JC, Beland P (1988) Toxicity of cultured isolates and natural populations ofProtogonyaulax tamarensis (Lebour) Taylor from the St. Lawrence Estuary. J Shellfish Res 7:611–622Google Scholar
  10. Cohn MS, Olsen P, Majoney JB, Feerst E (1980) Occurrence of the dinoflagellate (Gonyaulax tamarensis), in New Jersey. Bull NJ Acad Sci 33:45–49Google Scholar
  11. Costas E (1986) Aparicion de hibridos interspecificos deProrocentrum micans yProrocentrum triestinium en cultivos experimentales. Boln Inst exp Oceanogr 3:61–66Google Scholar
  12. Franks PJS, Anderson DM (1992) Alongshore transport of a toxic phytoplankton bloom in a buoyancy current:Alexandrium tamarense in the Gulf of Maine. Mar Biol 12:153–164Google Scholar
  13. Fritz L, Triemer RE (1985) A rapid simple technique utilizing Calcafluor White M2R for the visualization of dinoflagellate thecal plates. J Phycol 21:664–664Google Scholar
  14. Gallagher JC (1986) Population genetics of microalgae. Algal biomass technologies: an interdisciplinary perspective. Nova Hedwigia 83:6–14Google Scholar
  15. Guillard RRL, Ryther JH (1962) Studies of marine plankton diatoms. I.Cyclotella nana Hustedt andDetonula confervacea (Cleve) Gra. Can J Microbiol 8:229–239Google Scholar
  16. Hall S, Strichartz G, Moczydlowski E, Ravindran A, Reiochardt PB (1990) The saxitoxins; sources, chemistry, and pharmacology. In: Hall S, Strichartz G (eds) Marine toxins: origin, structure, and molecular pharmacology. Amer. Chem. Soc. Symp. Ser. No. 418, Amer. Chem. Soc. Washington, DC, pp 29–65Google Scholar
  17. Hartwell AD (1975) Hydrographic factors affecting the distribution and movement of toxic dinoflagellates in the western Gulf of Maine. In; Lo Cicero VR (ed) Proceedings of the first international conference on toxic dinoflagellate blooms. Massachusetts Science and Technology Foundation, Wakefield, Massachusetts, pp 47–68Google Scholar
  18. Hayhome BA, Anderson DM, Kulis DM, Whitten DM (1989) Variation among congeneric dinoflagellates from the northeastern United States and Canada. I. Enzyme electrophoresis. Mar Biol 101:427–435Google Scholar
  19. Ishida Y, Kim CH, Sako Y, Hirooka N, Uchida A (1993) PSP toxin production is chromosome dependent inAlexandrium spp. In: Smayda T, Shimizu Y (eds) Toxic phytoplankton blooms in the sea. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 881–887Google Scholar
  20. Lillick LC (1937) Seasonal studies of the phytoplankton off Woods Hole Massachusetts. Biol Bull mar biol Lab, Woods Hole 73:488–503Google Scholar
  21. Loeblich LA, Loeblich AR III (1975) The organism causing New England red tides:Gonyaulax excavata. In: Lo Cicero V (ed) Toxic dinoflagellate blooms. Proceedings of the first international conference on toxic dinoflagellate blooms. Massachusetts Science and Technology Foundation. Wakefield, Massachusetts, pp 207–224Google Scholar
  22. Manhart JR, McCourt RM (1992) Molecular data and species concepts in the algae. J Phycol 28:730–737Google Scholar
  23. Maranda L, Anderson DM, Shimizu Y (1985) Comparison of toxicity between populations ofGonyaulax tamarensis of eastern North American waters. Estur cstl Shelf Sci 21:401–410Google Scholar
  24. Martin JL, White AW (1988) Distribution and abundance of the toxic dinoflagellateGonyaulax excavata in the Bay of Fundy. Can J Fish aquat Sciences 45:1968–1975Google Scholar
  25. Mayr E (1942) Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Oshima Y, Sugino K, Yasumoto T (1989) Latest advances in HPLC analysis of paralytic shellfish toxins. In: Natori S, Hashimoto K, Ueno Y (eds) Mycotoxins and phycotoxins. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 319–326Google Scholar
  27. Pfiester L, Anderson DM (1987) Dinoflagellate reproduction. In: Taylor FJR (ed) The biology of dinoflagellates. Blackwell Scientific Publications. London, pp 611–648Google Scholar
  28. Prakash A, Medcof JC, Tenant AD (1971) Paralytic shellfish poisoning in eastern Canada. Bull Fish Res Bd Can 177:1–87Google Scholar
  29. Sako Y, Kim CH, Ishida Y (1992) Mendelian inheritance of paralytic shellfish poisoning toxin in the marine dinoflagellateAlexandrium catenella. Biosci Biotech Biochem 56:692–694Google Scholar
  30. Schmidt RJ, Loeblich AR III (1979) A discussion of the systematics of toxicGonyaulax species containing paralytic shellfish poison. In: Taylor DL, Seliger HH (eds) Toxic dinoflagellate blooms. Elsevier, New York, pp 83–88Google Scholar
  31. Scholin CA, Anderson DM (1994) Identification of group- and strain-specific genetic markers for globally distributedAlexandrium (Dinophyceae) species: I. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of small subunit ribosomal RNA genes. J Phycol (in press)Google Scholar
  32. Schrey SE, Carpenter EJ, Anderson DM (1984) The abundance and distribution of the toxic dinoflagellate,Gonyaulax tamarensis, in Long Island Estuaries. Estuaries 7:472–477Google Scholar
  33. Smith PC, Schwing FB (1991) Mean circulation and variability on the eastern Canadian continental shelf. Contin Shelf Res 11:977–1012Google Scholar
  34. Steidinger KA, Moestrup O (1990) The taxonomy ofGonyaulax, Pyrodinium, Alexandrium, Gessnerium, Protogonyaulax andGoniodoma. In: Graneli E, Sundstrom B, Edler L, Anderson D (eds) Toxic marine phytoplankton. Elsevier, New York, pp 522–523Google Scholar
  35. Steidinger KA, Tester LS, Taylor FJR (1980) A redescription ofPyrodinium bahamense var.compressa (Bohm) stat. nov. from Pacific red tides. Phycologia 19:329–337Google Scholar
  36. Taylor FJR (1976) Flagellate phylogeny: a study in conflicts. J Protozool 23:28–40Google Scholar
  37. Taylor FJR (1985) The taxonomy and relationships of red tide dinoflagellates. In: Anderson DM, White AW, Baden DG (eds) Toxic dinoflagellates. Elsevier, New York, pp 11–26Google Scholar
  38. Turgeon J, Cembella AD, Therriault J-C, Beland P (1990) Spatial distribution of resting cysts ofAlexandrium spp., in sediments of the lower St. Lawrence estuary and the Gaspé coast (Eastern Canada). In: Graneli E, Sundstrom B, Edler L, Anderson DM (eds) Toxic marine phytoplankton. Elsevier, New York, pp 238–243Google Scholar
  39. von Stosch HA (1973) Observation on vegetative reproduction and sexual life cycles of two freshwater dinoflagellates,Gymnodinium pseudopalustre andWoloszynskia apiculata sp. nov. Br. Phycol J 8:105–134Google Scholar
  40. White AW, Nassif J, Shumway SE, Whittaker DK (1993) Recent occurrence of paralytic shellfish toxins in offshore shellfish in the northeastern United States. In: Smayda T, Shimizu Y (eds) Toxic phytoplankton blooms in the sea. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 435–440Google Scholar
  41. White DRL, White AW (1985) First report of paralytic shellfish poisoning in Newfoundland. In: Anderson DM, White AW, Baden DG (eds) Toxic dinoflagellates. Elsevier, New York, pp 511–516Google Scholar
  42. Wood AM (1987) Molecular biology, single cell analysis and quantitative genetics: new evolutionary genetic approaches in phytoplankton ecology. In: Mague FC, Yentsch CM (eds) Immunochemical approaches to estuarine, coastal and ocenaographic questins. Elsevier, New York, pp 41–73Google Scholar
  43. Wood AM, Leatham T (1992) The species concept in phytoplankton ecology. J Phycol 28:723–729Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. M. Anderson
    • 1
  • D. M. Kulis
    • 1
  • G. J. Doucette
    • 1
  • J. C. Gallagher
    • 2
  • E. Balech
    • 3
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentWoods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionWoods HoleUSA
  2. 2.Biology DepartmentCity College of CUNYNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Casilla de Correo 64NecocheaArgentina

Personalised recommendations