Diazonium inactivation in simultaneous-coupling and product inhibition in post-coupling azo-techniques for demonstrating activity of acid hydrolases
- 28 Downloads
- 4 Citations
Summary
In this communication results are presented of an investigation in which the activity of the hydrolytic enzymes acid phosphatase, β-glucuronidase, non specific arylesterase, microsomal arylsulphatase, β-galactosidase, β-N-acetylglucosaminidase, acid α-glucosidase and aminopeptidase M are demonstrated in tissue sections with simultaneous- and post-coupling azo-techniques. Semipermeable membrane techniques are used to hamper enzyme diffusion during the incubation period. From the histochemical and biochemical findings it appeared that an advantage of the post-coupling techniques over the simultaneous-coupling techniques is that inactivation of the enzymes by the coupling reagents is avoided. On the other hand post-coupling techniques are subject to product inhibition. With kinetic inhibition studies it is found that for microsomal arylsulphatase and non-specific arylesterase this product inhibition is non-competitive. This product inhibition may be a problem for histochemical quantitative post-coupling techniques for the determination of acid hydrolase activity.
Keywords
Acid Phosphatase Product Inhibition Diazonium Hydrolase Activity Biochemical FindingPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Barka T, Anderson PJ (1962) Histochemical methods for acid phosphatase using hexazonium pararosanilin as coupler. J Histochem Cytochem 10:742–753Google Scholar
- Cleland WW (1963a) The kinetics of enzyme-catalyzed reactions with two or more substrates or products. 1. Nomenclature and rate equation. Biochim Biophys Acta 67:104–137Google Scholar
- Cleland WW (1963b) The kinetics of enzyme-catalyzed reactions with two or more substrates or products. 2. Inhibition; nomenclature and theory. Biochim Biophys Acta 67:173–187Google Scholar
- Gössner W (1958) Histochemischer Nachweis hydrolytischer Enzyme mit Hilfe der Azofarbstoffmethode. Untersuchungen zur Methodik und vergleichenden Histotopik der Esterasen und Phosphatasen bei Wirbeltieren. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 1:48–96Google Scholar
- Gossrau R (1976) Histochemische und biochemische Untersuchung der α-Glucosidasen mit 2-Naphthyl-α-d-Glucosid. Histochemistry 49:193–211Google Scholar
- Gossrau R (1977) Azoindoxylverfahren zum Hydrolasennachweis. II. Biochemische und histochemische Untersuchung der sauren β-Galactosidase. Histochemistry 51:219–237Google Scholar
- Kolthoff IM, Sandell EB (1946) The formation and properties of precipitates. In: Textbook of quantitative inorganic analysis. Macmillan, New York BostonGoogle Scholar
- Koudstaal J (1975) The histochemical demonstration of arylsulphatase in human tumours. Eur J Cancer 11:809–813Google Scholar
- Lojda Z, Večerek B, Pelichová H (1964) Some remarks concerning the histochemical detection of acid phosphatase by azo-coupling reactions. Histochemie 3:428–454Google Scholar
- Lojda Z (1975) The use of hexazonium-p-rosanilin in the histochemical demonstration of peptidases. Histochemistry 44:323–335Google Scholar
- Lojda Z, Gossrau R, Schiebler TH (1979) Enzyme histochemistry. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Meijer AEFH (1972) Semipermeable membranes for improving the histochemical demonstration of enzyme activities in tissue sections. I. Acid phosphatase. Histochemie 30:31–39Google Scholar
- Meijer AEFH, Vloedman AHT (1973) Semipermeable membranes for improving the histochemical demonstration of enzyme activities in tissue sections. II. Non-specific esterase and β-glucuronidase. Histochemie 34:127–134Google Scholar
- Meijer AEFH (1980) Semipermeable membrane techniques in quantitative enzyme histochemistry. In: Evered D, O'Connor M (eds). Trends in enzyme histochemistry and cytochemistry (Ciba Foundation Symposium 73). Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 103–120Google Scholar
- Notation AD, Unger F (1969) Regulation of rat testis steroid sulfatase. A kinetic study. Biochemistry 8:501–506Google Scholar
- Pearse AGE (1972) Histochemistry. Theoretical and applied, vol 2. Churchill, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Rudolph FB (1979) Product inhibition and abortive complex formation. In: Purich DL (ed) Methods in enzymology, vol 63. Academic Press, New York London, pp 411–436Google Scholar
- Smith EL, Hill RL (1960) Leucine aminopeptidase. In: Boyer PD, Lardy H, Myrbäck K (eds) The enzymes, vol 4. Academic Press, New York London, pp 37–62Google Scholar
- Stoward PJ (1980) Criteria for the validitation of quantitative histochemical enzyme techniques. In: Evered D, O'Connor M (eds) Trends in enzyme histochemistry and cytochemistry. (CIBA Foundation Symposium 73) Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 11–27Google Scholar
- Stoward PJ, Al Sarraj B, Ireland H (1981) Quantitative histochemical investigation of semipermeable membrane techniques for the assay of acid phosphatase in skeletal muscle. II. Nonspecific reactions in control sections. Histochemistry 71:585–598Google Scholar
- Stoward PJ, Campbell JB, Al Sarraj B (1982) Quantitative histochemical investigations of semipermeable membrane techniques for the assay of acid phosphatase in skeletal muscle. IV Post coupling technique. Histochemistry 74:367–377Google Scholar
- Walter K, Schütt C (1974) Saure und alkalische Phosphatase im Serum. In: Bergmeyer HU (ed) Methoden der enzymatischen Analyse, vol 1. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp 888–893Google Scholar
- Webb JL (1963) Enzyme and metabolic inhibitions, vol 1. Academic Press, New York LondonGoogle Scholar