Metal Science and Heat Treatment

, Volume 19, Issue 7, pp 512–517 | Cite as

Kinetics of crack growth in maraging and medium-alloy steels during low-cycle impact fatigue tests

  • I. V. Pestov
  • V. A. Ostapenko
  • M. D. Perkas
  • A. Ya. Maloletnev
  • N. A. Kretov
Maraging Steels

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    The duration of the period of crack nucleation in steels N18K9M5T and 30KhN2MFA varies little with the magnitude of cyclic stresses.

     
  2. 2.

    A period of slow crack growth is observed in steels 30KhN2MFA and N18K9M5T at σmax=165 kgf/mm2 and is characterized by fatigue microbands in the fracture-ductile in the maraging steel, brittle in the medium-carbon steel. With increasing crack length (period of accelerated crack growth) the area occupied by microbands in the fracture decreases and the percentage of dimpled fracture increases.

     
  3. 3.

    At high cyclic stresses (σmax=260 and 360 kgf/mm2) the period of slow crack growth is absent in steels 30KhN2MFA and N18K9M5T.

     
  4. 4.

    The rate of crack growth determined by the difference of electrical potentials is in satisfactory agreement with the width of fatigue microbands, particularly in the period of slow crack growth. In the period of accelerated crack growth it is somewhat higher than the width of microbands.

     
  5. 5.

    The high regularity of fatigue microbands in the fractures of steel N18K9M5T indicates greater evenness of the properties determining the resistance to fracture at high cyclic impact loads than for steel 30KhN·2MFA.

     

Keywords

Fatigue Cyclic Stress Crack Nucleation Maraging Steel Slow Crack Growth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    V. S. Ivanova, "Dislocation-energetic analysis of strengthening factors and possible increases in the cyclic strength of metals," in: Strength of Metals with Cyclic Loads [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1967), p. 8.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. M. Shkol]nik, Crack Growth Rate and Life of Metals [in Russian], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1973), p. 66.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. S. Tetelman and A. J. McEvily, "Fracture of high-strength materials," in: Fracture [Russian translation], Vol. 6, Metallurgiya, Moscow, p. 173.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Van Dyck, Rev. Techn., Luxemburg,60, No. 2, 73 (1968).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Bates and W. Clark, Trans. ASM,62, 380 (1969).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. A. Balter et al., "Fractographic study of fatigue fractures of iron and steel," Metalloved. Term. Obrab. Met., No. 7, 31 (1975).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. S. Ivanova, L. R. Botvina, and L. I. Maslov, "Fractographic characteristics and fracture toughness of steel with cyclic stresses," Probl. Prochn., No. 2, 37 (1972).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. S. Ivanova et al., "Dislocation arrays at the tip of the fatigue crack in iron," Probl. Prochn., No. 11, 11 (1975).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. P. Gulyaev et al., "Electron microscopic study of fatigue fractures," Probl. Prochn. No. 5, 24 (1973).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Steigervald and G. Hanna, Proc. ASTM,62, 885 (1962).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Anstil, E. Kula, and E. Cesare, Proc. ASTM,63, 799 (1963).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. D. Kal'ner, A. G. Zil'berman, and F. I. Shor, "Use of scanning electron microscope in study of metals and alloys," Zavod. Lab., No. 9, 1103 (1974).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. E. Gurevich and L. D. Edidovich, "Rate of crack propagation and threshold values of the stress intensity coefficient in the process of fatigue fracture," in: Fatigue and Fracture Toughness of Metals [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1974), p. 50.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. D. Beachem and R. M. Pellou, "Electron fractography — a means of studying the mechanism of fracture processes," in: Applied Problems of Fracture Toughness [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1968), p. 336.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. Schvalbe, Z. Metallkunde,62, No. 1, 59 (1971).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. S. Ivanova, L. B. Botvina, and L. I. Maslov, "Fractographic characteristics of fatigue fractures and fracture toughness," in: Fatigue and Fracture Toughness of Metals [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1974), p. 101.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    W. Plumbridge and D. Rider, Acta Met.,17, No. 12, 1449 (1969).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. A. Balter et al., "Effect of surface plastic deformation on development of fatigue cracks," Probl. Prochn., No. 1, 96 (1974).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. D. Perkas, "Structure and properties of high-strength steels with aging martensite," Metalloved. Term. Obrab. Met., No. 7, 18 (1970).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    W. Steven, High Alloy Steels. Special Report, Iron and Steel Inst., London, No. 86 (1964), p. 257.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. V. Pestov
  • V. A. Ostapenko
  • M. D. Perkas
  • A. Ya. Maloletnev
  • N. A. Kretov

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations