International Journal of Theoretical Physics

, Volume 31, Issue 9, pp 1669–1687 | Cite as

Macroscopic realizations of quantum logics

  • A. A. Grib
  • R. R. Zapatrin
Article

Summary

Two-particle quantum systems with spin can be simulated by classical automata described by graphs. These graphs are associated with nondistributive property lattices of these quantum systems. We emphasize that to non-local properties of a quantum system being in a certain eigenstate of the permutation operator there correspond merely some additional vertices in the graph which have nothing “nonlocal” in their nature. This leads to the possibility of violating Bell's inequalities in classical systems described by graphs (see Section 6) without violating relativity theory.

The subjective interpretation of quantum mechanics of von Neumann, London, and Bauer can be connected with the Boolean nature of mind grasping the non-Boolean nature of the world, which results in the projection postulate: wave packet reduction. A simple example is given for a two-particle system with spin.

Keywords

Field Theory Quantum Field Theory Quantum Mechanic Quantum System Wave Packet 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bitbol, M. (1983). An analysis of the EPR correlations in terms of events,Physics Letters A,96, 6670.Google Scholar
  2. D'Espagnat, B. (1976).Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics.Google Scholar
  3. Deutch, D. (1985).Proceedings of the Royal Society A,400, 97.Google Scholar
  4. Everett, H. (1957). Relative state formulation of quantum mechanics,Review of Modern Physics,29, 454.Google Scholar
  5. Finkelstein, D. (1963). The logic of quantum physics,Transactions of the New York Academy of Science II,25, 621.Google Scholar
  6. Finkelstein, D., and Finkelstein, S. R. (1982). Computational complementarity,International Journal of Theoretical Physics,22, 753.Google Scholar
  7. Fock, V. A. (1965).Quantum Physics and Matter, LGU, Leningrad.Google Scholar
  8. Grib, A. A. (1984). Quantum correlations at macroscopical distances and Bell's inequalities,Soviet Physics-Uspekhi,142(4).Google Scholar
  9. Grib, A. A., and Zapatrin, R. R. (1990). Automata simulating quantum systems,International Journal of Theoretical Physics,29, 131.Google Scholar
  10. Grib, A. A., and Zapatrin, R. R. (n.d.). Quantum logical description of two-particle systems,International Journal of Theoretical Physics, submitted.Google Scholar
  11. London, F., and Bauer, E. (1939).Theorie de l'observation en mechanique quantique, Gauthier-Villards, Paris.Google Scholar
  12. Ludwig, G. (1989). Atoms: Are they real or are they objects?Foundations of Physics,19, 971.Google Scholar
  13. Zapatrin, R. R. (1990). Graph representation of finite ortholattices, inSecond Winter School on Measure Theory, Liptovsky Jan, Czechoslovakia, January 6–13, 1990, A. Dvurecenskij and S. Pulmannová, eds.Google Scholar
  14. Zapatrin, R. R. (n.d.). Graphs, polarities and finite ortholattices,Discrete Mathematics, submitted.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Grib
    • 1
  • R. R. Zapatrin
    • 1
  1. 1.St. Petersburg Financial Economical InstituteSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations