Boson representations of symplectic algebras
Article
Received:
- 38 Downloads
- 19 Citations
Abstract
A reduction of the boson representation of the algebra of the noncompact groupSp(4k, R), k>0, to its subgroupSU(k) is realized. The reduction scheme has two main branches: one through the totally symmetric unitary representations of the maximal compact subalgebra u(2k); the other through the ladder representations of the noncompact subalgebrau(k, k). Both reductions are accomplished by means of the same set of Hermitian operators, but taken in different order. The case ofk=3, for the groupSp(12,R), used in the interacting vector boson model, is discussed in more detail.
Keywords
Field Theory Elementary Particle Quantum Field Theory Unitary Representation Reduction Scheme
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Acherova, R. M., Knir, V. A., Smirnov, Yu. F., and Tolstoy, V. N. (1975).Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics,21, 1126.Google Scholar
- Alhassid, Y., Gursey, F., and Iachello, F. (1983).Annals of Physics,148, 346.Google Scholar
- Andersen, R. L., Fischer, J., and Raczka, R. (1967).Proceedings of the Royal Society A,302, 491.Google Scholar
- Bargmann, V., and Moshinsky, M. (1961).Nuclear Physics,42, 469.Google Scholar
- Barut, A. O., and Kleinert, H. (1967).Physical Review,156, 1541.Google Scholar
- Barut, A. O., and Raszka, R. (1977).Theory of Group Representations and Applications, PWN, Warsaw.Google Scholar
- Dothan, Y., Gell-Mann, M., and Ne'eman, Y. (1965).Physics Letters,17, 148.Google Scholar
- Georgieva, A., Raychev, P., and Roussev, R. (1982).Journal of Physics G: Nuclear Physics,8, 1377.Google Scholar
- Georgieva, A., Raychev, P., and Roussev, R. (1983).Journal of Physics G: Nuclear Physics,9, 521.Google Scholar
- Kibler, M., and Negady, T. (1983a).Nuovo Cimento, Lettere,37, 225.Google Scholar
- Kibler, M., and Negadi, T. (1983b).Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General,16, 4265.Google Scholar
- Kibler, M., and Negadi, T. (1984).Physical Review A,29, 2891.Google Scholar
- Mack, G., and Todorov, I. (1969).Journal of Mathematical Physics,10, 2078.Google Scholar
- Malkin, I. A., and Man'ko, V. I. (1965).JETP Letters,2, 146.Google Scholar
- Moshinsky, M. (1962).Review of Modern Physics,34, 813.Google Scholar
- Raychev, P. (1972).Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics,16, 1171.Google Scholar
- Rosensteel, G., and Rowe, D. J. (1977a).Physical Review Letters,38, 10.Google Scholar
- Rosensteel, G., and Rowe, D. J. (1977b).International Journal of Theoretical Physics,16, 63.Google Scholar
- Rosensteel, G., and Rowe, D. J. (1980).Annals of Physics,126, 343.Google Scholar
- Todorov, I. T. (1966). ICTP, Trieste, preprint IC/66/71.Google Scholar
- Vanagas, V. (1971).Algebraic Methods in Nuclear Theory, Mintis, Vilnius.Google Scholar
- Vanagas, V., Nadjakov, E., and Raychev, P. (1975). ICTP, Trieste, preprint IC/75/40.Google Scholar
- Varshalovich, D. A., Moskalev, A. N., and Hersonsky, V. K. (1975).Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum, Nauka, Leningrad.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1986