Foundations of Physics Letters

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 291–302

Proposal for experiments to detect the missing torque in special relativity

  • Gianfranco Spavieri
Article

Abstract

The torque experienced by a current loop, of magnetic momentm, and moving with velocityv in an electric fieldE, cannot be explained in terms of the interaction between the loop current andE, but only by taking into account the internal stress in the loop. This subtle effect can be tested by measuring the frequency changes in the Zeeman splitting of moving atoms, the change of helicity of elementary particles, and the current induced in a moving coil. These tests may have relevance in the context of modern ether theories and of the Aharonov-Casher effect.

Key words

special relativity paradoxes tests of modern ether theories 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. W. Sherwin,Phys. Rev. A 35, 3650 (1987).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. K. A. Maciel and J. Tiomno,Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 143 (1985).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Chang,Phys. Lett. 70A, 1 (1979);J. Phys. A 13, L207 (1980);Found. Phys. 13, 1013 (1983).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. G. Vargas,Lett. Nuovo Cimento,28, 289 (1980);Found.Phys. 12, 889 (1982);14, 625 (1984).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. G. Torr and P. Kolen,Found. Phys. 12, 256, 401 (1982).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. G. Vargas and D. G. Torr,Phys. Rev. A 39, 2878 (1989).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Spavieri,Phys. Rev. A 34, 1708 (1986).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Spavieri,Found. Phys. Lett. 1, 373, 387 (1988);2, 61 (1989).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Spavieri and G. Contreras,Nuovo Cimento 91 B, 143 (1986); G. Spavieri and J. Bergamaschi,Nuovo Cimento,104 B, 497 (1989).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Cavalleri and G. Spavieri,Nuovo Cimento 101 A, 213 (1989).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Cavalleri and G. Spinelli,Found. Phys. 13, 1221 (1983).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. A. Winnie,Phil. Sci. 37, (1), 223 (1970).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Ungar,Phil. Sci. 53, 395 (1986).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. H. Boyer,Phys. Rev. A 36, 5083 (1987);Am. J. Phys. 56, 688 (1988).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Y. Aharonov and A. Casher,Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 319 (1984).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    W. Rindler and J. Demur,Am. J. Phys. 56, 795 (1988).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Bedford and P. Krumm,Am. J. Phys. 54, 1036 (1986);57, 178 (1989).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. Namias,Am. J. Phys. 57, 171, 178 (1989). This author considers the special case of a conducting loop only.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. D. Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1966), Sec.11.11.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    See Ref.19, Sect.12.10 and C.MollerThe theory of Relativity (Oxford University press, Oxford,1969), Sec. 69.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Laue,Physik. Z. 12, 1008 (1911).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    R. C. Tolman,Relativity, Thermodynamics and Cosmology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1958), Sec. 38.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    See for example G. Cavalleri and G. Salgarelli,Nuovo Cimento 62 A, 722 (1969); F. Rohrlich,Nuovo Cimento 45 B, 76 (1966); J. C. Nickerson and R. T. McAdory,Am. J. Phys. 43, 615 (1975); G. Cavalleri, G. Spavieri, and G. Spinelli,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 15, 631 (1976);Nuovo Cimento 53 B, 385 (1979).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. W. Butler,Am. J. Phys. 36, 936 (1968).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    F. Rohrlich,Am. J. Phys. 28, 639 (1960);38, 1310 (1970). See also Ref. 19, Sec. 17.5.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    See H. Smyth and C. Ufford,Matter, Motion and Electricity (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1939), p. 332; W. G. V. Rosser,The Theory of Relativity (Butterworths, London, 1964), p. 60.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    G. G. Stokes,Phil. Mag. 28, 76;29, 6 (1846). See also G. Cavalleri, L. Galgani, G. Spavieri, and G. Spinelli,Scientia 111, 675 (1976); G. Spavieri,Found. Phys. Lett. 2, 61 (1989).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    See for example G. R. Isaak,Phys. Bull. 21, 255 (1970); A. Brillet and J. L. Hall,Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 549 (1979); E. Riiset al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 81 (1988).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    N. F. Ramsey,Molecular Beams (Oxford University press, New york, 1955); E. U. Condon and Hugh Odishaw,Handbook of Physics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967), Sec. 7–70.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gianfranco Spavieri
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Departamento de FisicaUniversidad de Los AndesMeridaVenezuela

Personalised recommendations