Oecologia

, Volume 84, Issue 1, pp 53–57

Preference of cabbage white butterflies and honey bees for nectar that contains amino acids

  • Janis Alm
  • Thomas E. Ohnmeiss
  • Janet Lanza
  • Lauren Vriesenga
Original Papers

Summary

Amino acids occur in most floral nectars but their role in pollinator attraction is relatively unstudied. Nectars of butterfly-pollinated flower tend to have higher concentrations of amino acids than do flowers pollinated by bees and many other animals, suggesting that amino acids are important attractants of butterflies to flowers. In order to determine whether amino acids are important in attracting butterflies and bees, we tested the preference of cabbage white butterflies (Pieris rapae) and honey bees (Apis mellifera) by allowing them to feed from artificial flowers containing sugar-only or sugar-amino acid mimics ofLantana camara nectar. Honey bees and female cabbage white butterflies consumed more sugar-amino acid nectar than sugar-only nectar. In addition, female cabbage white butterflies visited artificial flowers containing sugar-amino acid nectars more frequently than flowers containing sugar-only nectars; honey bees spent more time consuming the sugar-amino acid nectar. Male cabbage white butterflies did not discriminate between the two nectars. These results support the hypothesis that the amino acids of nectar contribute to pollinator attraction and/or feeding.

Key words

Amino acids Apis mellifera Pieris rapae Nectars Pollinators 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arms K, Feeny P, Lederhouse RC (1974) Sodium: Stimulus for puddling behavior by tiger swallowtail butterflies,Papilio glaucus. Science 185: 372–374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker HG, Baker I (1973) Amino-acids in nectar and their evolutionary significance. Nature 241: 543–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker HG, Baker I (1977) Intraspecific constancy of floral nectar amino acid complements. Bot Gaz 138: 183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker HG, Baker I (1983a) Floral nectar constituents in relation to pollinator type. In: Jones CE, Little RJ (eds) Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Scientific and Academic Editions, New York, pp 117–141Google Scholar
  5. Baker HG, Baker I (1983b) A brief historical review of the chemistry of floral nectar. In: Bentley B, Elia T (eds) The biology of nectaries. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 126–152Google Scholar
  6. Baker HG, Baker I (1986) The occurrence and significance of amino acids in floral nectars. Plant Syst Evol 151: 175–186Google Scholar
  7. Baker HG, Opler PA, Baker I (1978) A comparison of the amino acid complements of floral and extrafloral nectars. Bot Gaz 139: 322–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernays EA, Simpson SJ (1982) Control of food intake. In: Berridge MJ, Treherne JE, Wigglesworth VB (eds) Advances in insect physiology, vol 16. Academic Press, New York, pp 59–118Google Scholar
  9. Bertin RI (1988) Pollination biology. In: Abrahamson WG (ed) Plant-animal interactions. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 23–86Google Scholar
  10. Boggs CL (1981) Selection pressures affecting male nutrient investment at mating in Heliconiine butterflies. Evolution 35: 931–940Google Scholar
  11. Boggs CL (1986) Reproductive strategies of female butterflies: Variation in and constraints on fecundity. Ecol Entomol 11: 7–15Google Scholar
  12. Boggs CL, Gilbert LE (1979) Male contribution to egg production in butterflies: Evidence for transfer of nutrients at mating. Science 206: 83–84Google Scholar
  13. Dodson CH (1975) Coevolution of orchids and bees. In: Gilbert LE, Raven PH (eds) Coevolution of animals and plants. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 91–99Google Scholar
  14. Douglas MM (1986) The lives of butterflies. The University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunlap-Pianka H, Boggs CL, Gilbert LE (1977) Ovarian dynamics in Heliconiine butterflies: Programmed senescence versus eternal youth. Science 197:487–490Google Scholar
  16. Faegri K, van der Pijl L (1979) The principles of pollination ecology. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Gilbert LE (1972) Pollen feeding and reproductive biology ofHeliconius butterflies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 69:1403–1407Google Scholar
  18. Hainsworth FR, Wolf LL (1976) Nectar characteristics and food selection by hummingbirds. Oecologia 25:101–113Google Scholar
  19. Harborne JB (1982) Introduction to ecological biochemistry. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Inouye DW, Waller GD (1984) Responses of honey bees (Apis mellifera) to amino acid solutions mimicking floral nectars. Ecology 65:618–625Google Scholar
  21. Jones RE, Hart JR, Bull GD (1982) Temperature, size and egg production in the cabbage butterfly,Pieris rapae L. Aust J Ecol 30:223–232Google Scholar
  22. Karlsson B (1987) Variation in egg weight, oviposition rate and reproductive reserves with female age in a natural population of the speckled wood butterfly,Pararge aegeria. Ecol Entomol 12:473–476Google Scholar
  23. Kevan PG, Baker HG (1983) Insects as flower visitors and pollinators. Annu Rev Entomol 28:407–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koptur S (1979) Facultative mutualism between weedy vetches bearing extrafloral nectaries and weedy ants in California. Am J Bot 66:1016–1020Google Scholar
  25. Lanza J (1988) Ant preferences forPassiflora nectar mimics that contain amino acids. Biotropica 20:341–344Google Scholar
  26. Lanza J, Krauss BR, (1984) Detection of amino acids in artificial nectars by two tropical antsLeptothorax andMonomorium. Oecologia 63:423–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moore RA, Singer MC (1987) Effects of maternal age and adult diet on egg weight in the butterflyEuphydryas editha. Ecol Entomol 12:401–408Google Scholar
  28. Murphy DD, Launer AE, Ehrlich PR (1983) The role of adult feeding in egg production and population dynamics of the Checkerspot butterflyEuphydryas editha. Oecologia 56:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neck RW (1983) Significance of visits by hackberry butterflies (Nymphalidae:Asterocampa) to flowers. J Lepid Soc 37:269–274Google Scholar
  30. Opler PA, Krizek GO (1984) Butterflies east of the Great Plains. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  31. Potter CF, Bertin RI (1988) Amino acids in artificial nectar: Feeding preferences of the flesh flySarcophaga bullata. Am Midl Nat 120:156–162Google Scholar
  32. Pyle RM (1984) The Audubon society handbook for butterfly watchers. Scribner's Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Ray TS, Andrews CC (1980) Antbutterflies: Butterflies that follow army ants to feed on antbird droppings. Science 210:1147–1148Google Scholar
  34. Rutowski RL (1981) Mate choice and lepidopteran mating behavior. Fla Entomol 65: 72–82Google Scholar
  35. Schmidt JO, Thoenes SC, Levin MD (1987) Survival of honey bees,Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae), fed various pollen sources. Ann Entomol Soc Am 80: 176–183Google Scholar
  36. Simpson BB, Neff JL (1983) Evolution and diversity of floral rewards. In: Jones CE, Little RJ (eds) Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Scientific and Academic Editions, New York, pp 142–159Google Scholar
  37. Slansky F Jr, Feeny P (1977) Stabilization of the rate of nitrogen accumulation by larvae of the cabbage white butterfly on wild and cultivated food plants. Ecol Monogr 47:209–228Google Scholar
  38. Waddington KD (1987) Nutritional ecology of bees. In: Slansky F Jr, Rodriguez JG (eds) Nutritional ecology of insects, mites, spiders, and related invertebrates. Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 393–419Google Scholar
  39. Watt WB, Hoch PC, Mills SG (1974) Nectar resource use byColias butterflies. Oecologia 14:353–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janis Alm
    • 1
  • Thomas E. Ohnmeiss
    • 1
  • Janet Lanza
    • 1
  • Lauren Vriesenga
    • 2
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentState University of New York College at FredoniaFredoniaUSA
  2. 2.Biology DepartmentHobart and William Smith CollegesGenevaUSA

Personalised recommendations