Journal of comparative physiology

, Volume 137, Issue 3, pp 243–248 | Cite as

Evidence for celestial and magnetic compass orientation in lake migrating sockeye salmon fry

  • Thomas P. Quinn
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    Radially symmetrical, four-armed tanks were designed for testing the directional preferences of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) fry as they commenced up-lake migrations following emergence from gravel nests and river migration to the lake.

     
  2. 2.

    When tested during the day or night, as appropriate for their migration, fry from two different stocks moved in compass directions corresponding to the directions which they would have to maintain in their up-lake migration.

     
  3. 3.

    The directional preferences of one population tested during the non-migratory time of day apparently corresponded to the fry's onshore movement.

     
  4. 4.

    Orientation was maintained under both overcast and clear skies, and under plastic covers as well. A 90° counter-clockwise shift in the horizontal component of the earth's magnetic field was associated with approximately 90° changes in the mean direction of movement of fry at night, even when they were given a view of the sky. During the day, only fish tested in covered tanks displayed redirected movements in the altered field; those tested with a view of the sky showed geographically appropriate movement patterns despite the shifted field.

     

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Batschelet, E.: Statistical methods for the analysis of problems in animal orientation and certain biological rhythms. Washington, D.C.: Am. Inst. Biol. Sci. 1965Google Scholar
  2. Bodznick, D.: Water source preference and lakeward migration of sockeye salmon fry (Oncorhynchus nerka). J. Comp. Physiol.127, 139–146 (1978)Google Scholar
  3. Brannon, E.L.: Mechanisms controlling migration of sockeye salmon fry. Int. Pac. Salmon Fish. Commission Bull.21, 86 (1972)Google Scholar
  4. Davitz, M.A., McKaye, K.R.: Discrimination between horizontally and vertically polarized light by the cichlid fishPseudotropheus macrophthalmus. Copeia1978, 333–334 (1978)Google Scholar
  5. Dawson, J.J.: Determination of seasonal distribution of juvenile sockeye salmon in Lake Washington by means of acoustics. M. Sci. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle (1972)Google Scholar
  6. Dill, P.A.: Perception of polarized light by yearling sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can.28, 1319–1332 (1971)Google Scholar
  7. Forward, R.B., Horch, K.W., Waterman, T.H.: Visual orientation at the water surface by the teleostZenarchopterus. Biol. Bull.143, 112–126 (1972)Google Scholar
  8. Frankel, R.B., Blakemore, R.P., Wolfe, R.S.: Magnetite in fresh-water magnetotactic bacteria. Science203, 1355–1356 (1979)Google Scholar
  9. Goodyear, C.P.: Terrestrial and aquatic orientation in the starhead topminnow,Fundulus notti. Science168, 603–605 (1970)Google Scholar
  10. Goodyear, C.P., Ferguson, D.E.: Sun-compass orientation in the mosquitofish,Gambusia affinis. Anim. Behav.17, 636–640 (1969)Google Scholar
  11. Groot, C.: On the orientation of young salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) during their seaward migration out of lakes. Behav. Suppl.14, 198 (1965)Google Scholar
  12. Hasler, A.D., Horrall, R.M., Wisby, W.J., Braemer, W.: Sunorientation and homing fishes. Limnol. Oceanogr.3, 353–361 (1958)Google Scholar
  13. Hasler, A.D., Scholz, A.T., Horrall, R.M.: Olfactory imprinting and homing in salmon. Am. Sci.66, 347–355 (1978)Google Scholar
  14. Kalmijn, A.: Experimental evidence of geomagnetic orientation in elasmobranch fishes. In: Animal migration, navigation, and homing. Schmidt-Koenig, K., Keeton, W.T. (eds.), pp. 347–353. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1978Google Scholar
  15. Keeton, W.T.: Magnets interfere with pigeon homing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA68, 102–106 (1971)Google Scholar
  16. Kolb, R.: A review of Lake Washington sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) age and racial characteristics as determined by scale analysis. Unpublished report, State of Washington, Dept. of Fisheries (1971)Google Scholar
  17. Kreithen, M.L.: Sensory mechanisms for animal orientation — can any new ones be discovered? In: Animal migration, navigation, and homing. Schmidt-Koenig, K., Keeton, W.T. (eds.), pp. 25–34. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1978Google Scholar
  18. Loyacano, H.A., Chappell, J.A., Gauthreaux, S.A.: Sun-compass orientation in juvenile largemouth bass,Micropterus salmoides. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.106, 77–79 (1977)Google Scholar
  19. Neave, F.: Ocean migrations of Pacific salmon. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can.21, 1227–1244 (1964)Google Scholar
  20. Phillips, J.B.: Use of the earth's magnetic field by orienting cave salamanders (Eurycea lucifuga). J. Comp. Physiol.121, 273–288 (1977)Google Scholar
  21. Royce, W.F., Smith, L.S., Hartt, A.C.: Models of oceanic migrations of Pacific salmon and comments on guidance mechanisms. Fish. Bull. U.S.66, 441–462 (1968)Google Scholar
  22. Rubens, S.M.: Cube-surface coil for producing a uniform magnetic field. Rev. Sci. Instrum.16, 243–245 (1945)Google Scholar
  23. Schmidt-Koenig, K.: Migration and homing in animals. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1975Google Scholar
  24. Tesch, F.-W.: Influence of geomagnetism and salinity on the directional choice of eels. Helgol. Wiss. Meeresunters.26, 382–395 (1974)Google Scholar
  25. Traynor, J.J.: Seasonal changes in the abundance, size, biomass, production and distribution of the pelagic fish species in Lake Washington. M. Sci. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle (1973)Google Scholar
  26. United States Dept. of Commerce: NOAA's Climatological Data, National Summary21(13) (1970)Google Scholar
  27. Walcott, C., Gould, J.L., Kirschvink, J.L.: Pigeons have magnets. Science205, 1027–1029 (1979)Google Scholar
  28. Wiltschko, W., Wiltschko, R.: Magnetic compass of European robins. Science176, 62–64 (1972)Google Scholar
  29. Wiltschko, R., Wiltschko, W.: Relative importance of stars and the magnetic field for the accuracy of orientation in nightmigrating birds. Oikos30, 195–206 (1978)Google Scholar
  30. Winn, H.E., Salmon, M., Roberts, N.: Sun-compass orientation by parrot fishes. Z. Tierpsychol.21, 798–812 (1964)Google Scholar
  31. Woodey, J.C.: Distribution, feeding, and growth of juvenile sock-eye salmon in Lake Washington. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle (1972)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas P. Quinn
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Fisheries WH-10University of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations