Journal of comparative physiology

, Volume 119, Issue 3, pp 301–317 | Cite as

The cercus-to-giant interneuron system of crickets

III. Receptive field organization
  • John Palka
  • Robert Olberg
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    The pattern of functional connections between the receptors on the surface of the cerci of crickets and the two largest interneurons (MGI and LGI) of their ventral nerve cord was studied, with special attention given to groups of receptors defined by theirlocation on the cercal surface.

     
  2. 2.

    Selectively blocking the transversely vibrating T-hairs on the dorsal and ventral surfaces of the cercus severely reduces the response of both interneurons in the ipsilateral connective to sound stimuli.

     
  3. 3.

    Selectively blocking the longitudinally vibrating L-hairs on the medial and lateral surfaces leaves the response of the MGI unaffected and enhances the response of the LGI.

     
  4. 4.

    Selectively stimulating the T-hairs of the contralateral cercus markedly reduces the response of both giant fibers to ipsilateral stimulation. This effect is tonic.

     
  5. 5.

    We interpret these results to mean that ipsilateral T-hairs provide the main excitatory input to both the MGI and LGI, and thus determine the transversely oriented directional sensitivity curves of these cells. The contralateral T-hairs provide inhibition to both cells. Ipsilateral L-hairs excite the MGI weakly and apparently inhibit the LGI; there is also indirect evidence that contralateral L-hairs are weakly excitatory.

     
  6. 6.

    Progressively blocking both groups of hairs starting at the tip of the ipsilateral cercus has very little effect on the giant fiber response until the proximal 1 or 2 mm are reached. Blocking the receptors starting at the base of the cercus drastically reduces the response and elevates the threshold even when the great majority of receptors are still free.

     
  7. 7.

    Thus, there is variation in the effectiveness of inputs to the MGI and LGI both along the circumference of the cercus and along its length. There are several possible bases for such variation; we present one explicit model based on position-dependent probability of connection between receptors and interneurons. Finally, we suggest a causal link between the position of a receptor cell body on the surface of the cercus and the nature of the connections formed by its axon within the central nervous system.

     

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bentley, D.: Single gene cricket mutations: Effects on behavior, sensilla, sensory neurons and identified interneurons. Science187, 760–764 (1975)Google Scholar
  2. Blankenship, J.E., Wachtel, H., Kandel, E.R.: Ionic mechanisms of excitatory, inhibitory and dual synaptic actions mediated by an identified interneuron in the abdominal ganglion ofAplysia. J. Neurophysiol.34, 76–92 (1971)Google Scholar
  3. Burrows, M., Horridge, G.A.: The organization of inputs to motoneurons of the locust metathoracic leg. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B269, 49–94 (1974)Google Scholar
  4. Calabrese, R.L.: Crayfish mechanoreceptive interneurons. I. Nature of ipsilateral excitatory inputs. J. comp. Physiol.105, 83–102 (1976a)Google Scholar
  5. Calabrese, R.L.: Crayfish mechanoreceptive interneurons. II. Bilateral interactions and inhibition. J. comp. Physiol.105, 103–114 (1976b)Google Scholar
  6. Edwards, J.S., Palka, J.: The cerci and abdominal giant fibers of the house cricket,Acheta domesticus. I. Anatomy and physiology of normal adults. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B185, 83–103 (1974)Google Scholar
  7. French, V., Bryant, P.J., Bryant, S.V.: Pattern regulation in epimorphic fields. Science193, 969–980 (1976)Google Scholar
  8. Gnatzy, W.: The ultrastructure of the thread hairs on the cerci of the cockroachPeriplaneta americana L.: The intermoult phase. J. Ultrastruct. Res.54, 124–134 (1976)Google Scholar
  9. Kennedy, D.: Crayfish interneurons. Physiologist14, 5–30 (1971)Google Scholar
  10. Kennedy, D.: Connections among neurons of different types in crustacean nervous systems. In: The neurosciences: Third study program (F.O. Schmitt, F.C. Worden, eds.), pp. 379–388. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press 1974Google Scholar
  11. Lawrence, P.A.: Development and determination of hairs and bristles in the milkweed bugOncopeltus fasciatus. J. Cell Sci.1, 475–498 (1966)Google Scholar
  12. Lawrence, P.A.: The development of spatial patterns in the integument of insects. In: Developmental systems: insects, Vol. 2 (S.J. Counce, C.H. Waddington, eds.), pp. 157–209 (1973)Google Scholar
  13. Matsumoto, S.G., Murphey, R.K.: The cercus-to-giant interneuron system of crickets. IV. Patterns of connectivity between receptors and the medial giant interneuron. J. comp. Physiol.119, 319–330 (1977)Google Scholar
  14. Milburn, N.S., Bentley, D.R.: On the dendritic topology and activation of cockroach giant interneurons. J. Insect Physiol.17, 607–623 (1971)Google Scholar
  15. Murphey, R.K., Matsumoto, S.G.: Experience modifies the plastic properties of identified neurons. Science191, 564–566 (1976)Google Scholar
  16. Murphey, R.K., Matsumoto, S.G., Mendenhall, B.: Recovery from deafferentation by cricket interneurons after reinnervation by their peripheral field. J. Comp. Neurol.169, 335–346 (1976)Google Scholar
  17. Murphey, R.K., Palka, J., Hustert, R.: The cercus-to-giant interneuron system of crickets. II. Response characteristics of two giant interneurons. J. comp. Physiol.119, 285–300 (1977)Google Scholar
  18. Nicklaus, R.: Die Erregung einzelner Fadenhaare vonPeriplaneta americana in Abhängigkeit von der Größe und Richtung der Auslenkung. Z. vergl. Physiol.50, 331–362 (1965)Google Scholar
  19. Nicklaus, R.: Zur Richtungscharakteristik der Fadenhaare vonPeriplaneta americana. Z. vergl. Physiol.54, 434–436 (1967a)Google Scholar
  20. Nicklaus, R.: Elektronenmikroskopie am sensorischen Apparat der Fadenhaare auf den Cerci der SchabePeriplaneta americana. Z. vergl. Physiol.56, 412–415 (1967b)Google Scholar
  21. Palka, J., Edwards, J.S.: The cerci and abdominal giant fibers of the house cricket,Acheta domesticus. II. Regeneration and effects of chronic deprivation. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B185, 105–121 (1974)Google Scholar
  22. Palka, J., Levine, R., Schubiger, M.: The cercus-to-giant interneuron system of crickets. I. Some attributes of the sensory cells. J. comp. Physiol.119, 267–283 (1977)Google Scholar
  23. Palka, J., Schubiger, M.: Central connections of receptors on rotated and exchanged cerci of crickets. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.72, 966–969 (1975)Google Scholar
  24. Petrovskaya, Ye. D., Rozhkova, G.I., Tokareva, V.S., Etkin, V.S.: Properties and receptive fields of the central neurons of the cercal auditory system of the cricket. Biofizika14, 545–552 (1969)Google Scholar
  25. Rozhkova, G.I., Polischuk, N.A.: Constant representation of signal source location in the cercal system of the cricket. Biofizika21, 144–149 (1976)Google Scholar
  26. Rozhkova, G.I., Tokareva, V.S.: Influence of the ratio of excitatory and inhibitory afferent influences on the characteristics of the reactions of the auditory neurones of the cricket. Biofizika15, 902–912 (1970)Google Scholar
  27. Selverston, A.I., Mulloney, B.: Organization of the stomatogastric ganglion of the spiny lobster. II. Neurons driving the medial tooth. J. comp. Physiol.91, 33–51 (1974)Google Scholar
  28. Tokareva, V.S., Rozhkova, G.I.: Responses of the last abdominal ganglion units to air puffs and sounds of various directions in the cricketGryllus domesticus. Zh. Evol. Biokhim. Fiziol.9, 183–188 (1973)Google Scholar
  29. Wiese, K.: The mechanoreceptive system of prey localization inNotonecta. II. The principle of prey localization. J. comp. Physiol.92, 317–325 (1974)Google Scholar
  30. Wiese, K., Calabrese, R.L., Kennedy, D.: Integration of directional mechanosensory input by crayfish interneurons. J. Neurophysiol.39, 834–843 (1976)Google Scholar
  31. Wolpert, L.: Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. J. Theoret. Biol.25, 1–47 (1969)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Palka
    • 1
  • Robert Olberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations