Journal of Low Temperature Physics

, Volume 22, Issue 1–2, pp 185–212 | Cite as

Dynamic orientation of nuclei at low temperatures

  • W. de Boer
Article

Abstract

A study has been made of the mechanisms of dynamic polarization of nuclei in organic materials at temperatures below 1 K and in magnetic fields up to 50 kG. After a summary of the mechanisms of dynamic polarization, the experimental results on 1,2-propanediol, doped with paramagnetic CrV complexes, are compared quantitatively with a spin temperature model of Borghini, in which it is assumed that the nuclear polarization is obtained via thermal contact with a dynamically cooled electron spin-spin interaction reservoir. The strong influence of this latter reservoir was apparent from the transient behavior of different nuclear spin systems contained in the same sample. The abovementioned spin temperature model has the unique property of not using the simplifying “high-temperature approximation” and it was the first time that this model has been found to be in reasonable agreement with experimental data in the 100 mK region. Furthermore, dynamic polarization experiments with the free radical BDPA are reviewed. These measurements show clearly the contributions of different mechanisms of dynamic polarization. The results are found to be in agreement with formulas derived from the spin temperature theory after introduction of some simplifying assumptions in order to be able to deal with low temperatures.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Abragam,Principles of Nuclear Magnetism (Oxford Univ. Press, London, 1961).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. D. Jeffries,Dynamic Nuclear Orientation (Interscience Publishers, New York, 1963).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Goldman,Spin Temperature and Magnetic Resonance in Solids (Oxford Univ. Press, London, 1970).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Borghini, G. Shapiro, ed., inProc. 2nd Internat. Conf. on Polarized Targets, Berkeley, 1971 (LBL 500, UC-34 Physics, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, 1972), p. 1, and references quoted therein.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. L. Buishvili,Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 49, 1968 (1965) [English transl.,Soviet Phys.—JETP 22, 1277 (1966)]; L. L. Buishvili, M. D. Zviadadze, and G. R. Khutsishvili,Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 54, 876 (1968) [English transl.,Soviet Phys.—JETP 27, 469 (1968)].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. A. Atsarkin and M. I. Rodak,Uspekhi Fiz. Nauk 107, 3 (1972) [English transl.,Soviet Phys.—Uspekhi 15, 251 (1973)], and references quoted therein.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Th. Wenckebach and N. J. Poulis, in17th Congress Ampère, Turku, Finland, 1972 V. Hovi, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973), p. 120; W. Th. Wenckebach, T. J. B. Swanenburg, and N. J. Poulis,Phys. Reports, to be published.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Abragam and M. Borghini, inProgress in Low Temperature Physics, C. J. Corter, ed. (North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, 1964), Vol. IV, Chapter 8.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. E. Byvik and D. S. Wollan,The Spin Temperature Theory of Dynamic Nuclear Polarization (NASA TR R-427, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, 1974); D. S. Wollan, “Dynamic nuclear polarization with an inhomogeneous broadened ESR line,” submitted toPhys. Rev. B. Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    La Direction de la Physique, CEN (eds.),Proc. 1st Internat. Conf. on Polarized Targets and Ion Sources, Saclay, 1966); (La Documentation Française, Saclay, 1966); G. Shapiro (ed.),Proc. 2nd Internat. Conf. on Polarized Targets, Berkeley, 1971 (LBL 500, UC-34 Physics, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, 1972).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Kastler,C. R. Acad. Sci. B 233, 1444 (1951).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. W. Overhauser,Phys. Rev. 89, 689 (1953);92, 411 (1953).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Korringa,Phys. Rev. 94, 1388 (1954).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. G. Beljers, L. van der Kint, and J. S. van Wieringen,Phys. Rev. 95, 1683 (1954).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Abragam,Phys. Rev. 98, 1729 (1955).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. D. Jeffries,Phys. Rev. 106, 164 (1957).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. Bloembergen and P. P. Sorokin,Phys. Rev. 110, 865 (1958).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Abragam and W. G. Proctor,C. R. Acad. Sci. B 246, 2253 (1958).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. N. Provotorov,Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 41, 1582 (1961); [English transl.,Soviet Phys.—JETP 14, 1126 (1962)];Fiz. Tverd. Tela 4, 2940 (1962); [English transl.,Soviet Phys.—Solid State 4, 2155 (1963)];Phys. Rev. 128, 75 (1962).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    B. N. Provotorov,Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 42, 882 (1962); [English transl.,Soviet Phys.—JETP 15, 611 (1962)].Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Borghini, S. Mango, O. Runolfsson, and J. Vermeulen, inProc. 1st Internat. Conf. on Polarized Targets and Ion Sources, Saclay, 1966, La Direction de la Physique, CEN, eds. (La Documentation Française, Saclay, 1966), p. 387.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. Glättli, M. Odehnal, J. Ezratty, A. Malinovski, and A. Abragam,Phys. Lett. 29A, 5 (1969); A. Masaike, H. Glättli, J. Ezratty, and A. Malinovski,Phys. Lett. 30A, 63 (1969).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    W. de Boer and T. O. Niinikoski,Nucl. Instr. Meth. 114, 495 (1974).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    W. de Boer, M. Borghini, K. Morimoto, T. O. Niinikoski, and F. Udo,J. Low Temp. Phys. 15, 249 (1974).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. Borghini, W. de Boer, and K. Morimoto,Phys. Lett. 48A, 244 (1974).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. Goldman, M. Chapellier, Vu Hoang Chau, and A. Abragam,Phys. Rev. B 10, 226 (1974).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. A. Kozhushner,Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 56, 246 (1969); [English transl.,Soviet Phys.—JETP 29, 136 (1969)].Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. Borghini,Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 419 (1968).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    T. R. Carver and C. P. Slichter,Phys. Rev. 92, 212 (1953).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    M. Abraham, R. W. Kedzie, and C. D. Jeffries,Phys. Rev. 106, 165 (1957).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    F. M. Pipkin and J. W. Culvahouse,Phys. Rev. 106, 1102 (1957).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    C. D. Jeffries,Phys. Rev. 117, 1056 (1960).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    E. Erb, J. L. Motchane, and J. Uebersfeld,C. R. Acad. Sci. B 246, 2121, 3050 (1958).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    A. Abragam, J. Combrisson, and I. Solomon,C. R. Acad. Sci. B 247, 2237 (1958).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    M. Abraham, M. A. H. McCausland, and F. N. H. Robinson,Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 449 (1959).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    C. F. Hwang and D. A. Hill,Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1011 (1967).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    N. Bloembergen, E. M. Purcell, and R. V. Pound,Phys. Rev. 73, 679 (1948).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    A. M. Portis,Phys. Rev. 91, 1070 (1953);104, 584 (1956).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    M. Borghini,Phys. Lett. 26A, 242 (1968).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    M. A. Kozhushner and B. N. Provotorov,Fiz. Tverd. Tela 6, 1152 (1964); [English transl.,Soviet Phys.—Solid State 6, 1152 (1964)].Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    N. Bloembergen,Physica 15, 386 (1949); G. R. Khutsishvili, in17th Congress Ampère, Turku, Finland, 1972, V. Hovi, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973), p. 35.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    J. Philippot,Phys. Rev. 133, A471 (1964).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    A. G. Redfield,Phys. Rev. 98, 1787 (1955);Science 164, 1015 (1969).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    W. de Boer, Thesis (1974), University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands [CERN 74-11 (1974)].Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    V. N. Fedotov,Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 53, 1982 (1967); [English transl.,Soviet Phys.—JETP 26, 1123 (1968)].Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    W. Gorn and P. Robrish, inProc. 2nd Internat. Conf. on Polarized Targets, Berkeley, 1971, G. Shapiro, ed. (LBL 500, UC-34 Physics, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, 1972), p. 305.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    W. de Boer,Nucl. Instr. Meth. 107, 99 (1973).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    N. S. Garif'yanov, B. M. Kozyrev, and V. N. Fedotov,Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 178, 808 (1968); [English transl.,Soviet Phys. Dokl. 13, 107 (1968)].Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    H. Glättli, inProc. 2nd Internat. Conf. on Polarized Targets, Berkeley, 1971, G. Shapiro, ed. (LBL 500, UC-34 Physics, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, 1972), p. 281.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    E. Boyes, G. R. Court, B. Craven, R. Gamet, and P. J. Hayman, inProc. 2nd Internat. Conf. on Polarized Targets, Berkeley, 1971, G. Shapiro, ed. (LBL 500 UC-34 Physics, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, 1972), p. 403.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    M. Borghini and K. Scheffler,Nucl. Instr. Meth. 95, 93 (1971).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    M. Borghini and K. Scheffler,Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 1362 (1971); M. Borghini and F. Udo,Phys. Lett. 43A, 93 (1973).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    W. de Boer, M. Borghini, M. Rieubland, and F. Udo, “Dynamic polarization at3He temperatures in a 50 kG magnetic field,” unpublished results.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    A. Abragam, inProc. 1st Internat. Conf. on Polarized Targets and Ion Sources, Saclay, 1966, La Direction de la Physique, CEN, eds. (La Documentation Française, Saclay, 1966), p. 27.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    M. Odehnal and V. Bouffard,Phys. Lett. 32A, 407 (1970).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. de Boer
    • 1
  1. 1.CERNGenevaSwitzerland
  2. 2.Randall Laboratorium of PhysicsUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations