Journal of Low Temperature Physics

, Volume 17, Issue 1–2, pp 159–168 | Cite as

Consistent low-field picture of bcc3He exchange

  • L. I. Zane
  • J. R. Sites


Consideration of a physically plausible potential for bcc solid3He suggests that there is significant antiferromagnetic pair exchange between next nearest neighbors and that triple exchange is less important than previously believed. Experimental consequences of such a thesis are consistent with all existing low magnetic field data.


Magnetic Field Magnetic Material Field Data Experimental Consequence Pair Exchange 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1a.
    L. H. Nosanow and C. M. Varma,Phys. Rev. 187, 660 (1969).Google Scholar
  2. 1b.
    R. A. Guyer and L. I. Zane,Phys. Rev. 188, 445 (1969).Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    L. I. Zane,J. Low Temp. Phys. 9, 219 (1972).Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    L. Goldstein,Phys. Rev. A 8, 2160 (1973).Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    W. P. Kirk and E. D. Adams,Phys. Rev. Letters 27, 392 (1971).Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    David Park,Introduction to Quantum Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964).Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    A. K. McMahan and R. A. Guyer,Phys. Rev. A 7, 1105 (1973).Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    A. K. McMahan,J. Low Temp. Phys. 8, 115 (1972).Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    R. C. Richardson, E. Hunt, and H. Meyer,Phys. Rev. 138, A1326 (1965).Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    M. G. Richards, J. Hatton, and R. P. Gifford,Phys. Rev. 139, A91 (1965).Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    M. F. Panczyk and E. D. Adams,Phys. Rev. 187, 321 (1969).Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    E. B. Osgood and M. Garber,Phys. Rev. Letters 26, 353 (1971).Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    W. P. Kirk, E. B. Osgood, and M. Garber,Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 833 (1969).Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    J. R. Sites, D. D. Osheroff, R. C. Richardson, and D. M. Lee,Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 836 (1969).Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    P. B. Pipes and W. M. Fairbank,Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 520 (1969).Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    R. T. Johnson, O. V. Lounasmaa, R. Rosenbaum, O. G. Symko, and J. C. Wheatley,J. Low Temp. Phys. 2, 403 (1970).Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    S. H. Castles and E. D. Adams,Phys. Rev. Letters 30, 1125 (1973).Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    J. M. Dundon and J. M. Goodkind, to be published.Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    G. S. Rushbrook and P. J. Wood,Mol. Phys. 6, 409 (1963).Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    H. B. Callen and E. Callen,J. Phys. Soc. Japan 20, 1986 (1965).Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    W. P. Halperin and R. C. Richardson, private communication.Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    D. D. Osheroff, W. J. Gully, R. C. Richardson, and D. M. Lee,Phys. Rev. Letters 29, 920 (1972).Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    R. T. Johnson, D. N. Paulson, C. B. Pierce, and J. C. Wheatley,Phys. Rev. Letters 30, 207 (1973).Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    R. A. Guyer,Phys. Rev., to be published, March 1974.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. I. Zane
    • 1
  • J. R. Sites
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of Nevada at Las VegasLas Vegas
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsColorado State UniversityFort Collins

Personalised recommendations