Oecologia

, Volume 91, Issue 4, pp 579–586

Maternal effects on offspring growth and development depend on environmental quality in the frogBombina orientalis

  • David M. Parichy
  • Robert H. Kaplan
Original Papers

Summary

Differences in maternal investment and initial offspring size can have important consequences for offspring growth and development. To examine the effects of initial size variability in the frogBombina orientalis, we reared larvae (N=360) in one of two treatments representing different levels of environmental quality. We used snout-vent length at the feeding stage (stage 25, Gosner 1960) as a measure of maternal investment. In a “low quality” treatment, larvae were reared with two conspecific tadpoles and food was limited, whereas in a “high quality” treatment, larvae were reared individually and were fed ad libitum. Among tadpoles reared in the low quality treatment, individuals that were initially small had smaller body sizes through metamorphosis and longer larval periods than individuals that were initially large. Among tadpoles reared in the high quality treatment, initial size had only a weak influence on later larval size, and did not significantly affect metamorphic size of the duration of the larval period. This interaction between maternal investment and rearing conditions suggests that production of initially small offspring could be advantageous if these offspring develop in relatively benign environments, but disadvantageous if environments are more severe. These findings are discussed in light of previous studies that have demonstrated such interactions in organisms with complex life cycles.

Key words

Bombina orientalis Development Metamorphosis Maternal investment Variation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alford RA (1986) Effects of parentage on competitive ability and vulnerability to predation inHyla chrysoscelis tadpoles. Oecologia 68: 199–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amundsen T, Stokland JN (1990) Egg size and parental quality influence nestling growth in the shag. Auk 107: 410–413Google Scholar
  3. Bagenal TB (1969) Relationship between egg size and fry survival in brown troutSalmo trutta L. Fish Biol 1: 349–353Google Scholar
  4. Berven KA (1982) The genetic basis of altitudinal variation in the wood frogRana sylvatica. I. An experimental analysis of life history traits. Evolution 36: 962–983Google Scholar
  5. Berven KA (1988) Factors affecting variation in reproductive traits within a population of wood frogs (Rana sylvatica). Copeia 1988: 605–615Google Scholar
  6. Berven KA (1990) Factors affecting population fluctuations in larval and adult stages of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). Ecology 71: 1599–1608Google Scholar
  7. Berven KA, Chadra BG (1988) The relationship among egg size, density and food level on larval development in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). Oecologia 75: 67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berven KA, Gill DE (1983) Interpreting geographic variation in life-history traits. Am Zool 23: 85–97Google Scholar
  9. Brockelman WY (1975) Competition, the fitness of offspring, and optimal clutch size. Am Nat 109: 677–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bull JJ (1987) Evolution of phenotypic variance. Evolution 41: 303–315Google Scholar
  11. Caldwell JP, Thorp JH, Jervey TO (1980) Predator-prey relationships among larval dragonflies, salamanders, and frogs. Oecologia 46: 285–289Google Scholar
  12. Capinera JL (1979) Qualitative variation in plants and insects: effect of propagule size on ecological plasticity. Am Nat 114: 350–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cox DR, Snell EJ (1989) Analysis of binary data, 2d ed. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Crump ML (1981) Variation in propagule size as a function of environmental uncertainty for treefrogs. Am Nat 117: 724–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crump ML (1984) Intraclutch egg size variability inHyla crucifer (Anura: Hylidae). Copeia 1984: 302–308Google Scholar
  16. Crump ML (1991) Choice of oviposition site and egg load assessment by a treefrog. Herpetologica 47: 308–315Google Scholar
  17. Crump ML, Vaira M (1991) Vulnerability ofPleurodema borelli tadpoles to an avian predator: effect of body size and density. Herpetologica 47: 316–321Google Scholar
  18. Falconer DS (1989) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 3d ed. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Fraser DT (1980) On the environmental control of oocyte maturation in a plethodontid salamander. Oecologia 46: 302–307Google Scholar
  20. Freund RJ, Littell RC, Spector PC (1986) SAS system for linear models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  21. Gillespie JH (1977) Natural selection and variances in offspring numbers: a new evolutionary principle. Am Nat 111: 1010–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16: 183–190Google Scholar
  23. Hamburger V (1960) A manual of experimental embryology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  24. Howard RD (1980) Mating behavior and mating success in wood frogs,Rana sylvatica. Anim Behav 28: 705–716Google Scholar
  25. Huey RB (1980) Sprint velocity of tadpoles (Bufo boreas) through metamorphosis. Copeia 1980: 537–540Google Scholar
  26. Hutchings JA (1991) Fitness consequences of variation in egg size and food abundance in brook troutSalvelinus fontinalis. Evolution 45: 1162–1168Google Scholar
  27. John-Alder HB, Morin PJ (1990) Effects of larval density on jumping ability and stamina in newly metamorphosedBufo woodhousii fowleri. Copeia 1990: 856–859Google Scholar
  28. Kaplan RH (1980) The implications of ovum size variability for offspring fitness and clutch size within several populations of salamanders (Ambystoma). Evolution 34: 51–64Google Scholar
  29. Kaplan RH (1985) Maternal influences on offspring development in the California newt,Taricha torosa. Copeia 1985: 1028–1035Google Scholar
  30. Kaplan RH (1987) Developmental plasticity and maternal effects of reproductive characteristics in the frog,Bombina orientalis. Oecologia 71: 273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaplan RH (1989) Ovum size plasticity and maternal effects on the early development of the frog,Bombina orientalis, in a field population in Korea. Funct Ecol 3: 597–604Google Scholar
  32. Kaplan RH (1992) Greater maternal investment can decrease offspring survival in the frog,Bombina orientalis. Ecology 73: 280–288Google Scholar
  33. Kaplan RH, Cooper WS (1984) The evolution of developmental plasticity in reproductive characteristics: an application of the “adaptive coin-flipping” principle. Am Nat 123: 393–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaplan RH, Cooper WS (1988) On the evolution of coin-flipping plasticity: a response to McGinley, Temme, and Geber. Am Nat 132: 753–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kaplan RH, Salthe SN (1979) The allometry of reproduction: an empirical view in salamanders. Am Nat 113: 671–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kawamura T, Nishioka M, Ueda H (1972) Reproduction of the oriental fire-bellied toad,Bombina orientalis, with special reference to the superiority of this species as a laboratory animal. Sci Rep Lab Amphibian Biol, Hiroshima University 1: 303–317Google Scholar
  37. Korotkova EB (1978) Ecology of the orange-bellied toad in the Maritime Province. Ekologiya 4: 106–107Google Scholar
  38. Kusano T, Kusano H, Miyashita K (1985) Size-related cannibalism among larvalHynobius nebulosis. Copeia 1985: 472–476Google Scholar
  39. Lessels CM, Cooke F, Rockwell RF (1989) Is there a trade-off between egg weight and clutch size in wild Lesser snow geese (Anser c. caerulescens)? J Evol Biol 2: 457–472Google Scholar
  40. Marsh E (1986) Effects of egg size on offspring fitness and maternal fecundity in the orangethroat darter,Etheostoma spectabile (Pisces: Percidae). Copeia 1986: 18–30Google Scholar
  41. Marshall CJ, Doyle LS, Kaplan RH (1990) Intraspecific and sex-specific oophagy in a salamander and a frog: reproductive convergence ofTaricha torosa andBombina orientalis. Herpetologica 46: 395–399Google Scholar
  42. McGinley MA, Temme DH, Geber MA (1987) Parental investment in offspring in variable environments: theoretical and empirical considerations. Am Nat 130: 370–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meffe GK (1987) Embryo size variation in mosquitofish: optimality vs. plasticity in propagule size. Copeia 1987: 762–768Google Scholar
  44. Milliken GA (1984) SAS tutorial: analysis of covariance — models, strategies and interpretations. In: Proc. ninth ann. SAS users group intl. conference. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, pp 990–999Google Scholar
  45. Morris DW (1987) Optimal allocation of parental investment. Oikos 49: 332–339Google Scholar
  46. Newman RA (1987) Effects of density and predation onScaphiopus couchi tadpoles in desert ponds. Oecologia 71: 301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Newman RA (1989) Adaptive plasticity in development ofScaphiopus couchii tadpoles in desert ponds. Evol 42: 774–783Google Scholar
  48. Parichy DM, Kaplan RH (1992) Developmental consequences of tail injury on larvae of the oriental fire-bellied toad,Bombina orientalis. Copeia 1992: 129–137Google Scholar
  49. Petranka JW, Sih A (1987) Habitat duration, length of the larval period, and the evolution of a complex life cycle of a salamander,Ambystoma texanum. Evolution 41: 1347–1356Google Scholar
  50. Philippi T, Seger J (1989) Hedging one's evolutionary bets, revisited. Trends Ecol Evol 4: 41–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Phillips PC, Kaplan RH (1987) A personal computer-microscope interface for the analysis of size and shape. Herpetologica 43: 384–385Google Scholar
  52. Reid WV, Boersma PD (1990) Parental quality and selection on egg size in the magellanic penguin. Evolution 44: 1780–1786Google Scholar
  53. Richards CM (1962) The control of tadpole growth by algal-like cells. Physiol Zool 35: 285–296Google Scholar
  54. Richards SJ, Bull CM (1990) Size-limited predation on tadpoles of three Australian frogs. Copeia 1990: 1041–1046Google Scholar
  55. Rossiter MC (1991) Maternal effects generate variation in life history: consequences of egg weight plasticity in the gypsy moth. Funct Ecol 5: 386–393Google Scholar
  56. SAS Institute Inc. (1988) SAS/STAT user's guide, release 6.03 ed. Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  57. Schultz DL (1989) The evolution of phenotypic variance with iteroparity. Evolution 43: 473–475Google Scholar
  58. Schultz DL (1991) Parental investment in temporally varying environments. Evol Ecol 5: 415–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Selcer KW (1990) Egg-size relationships in a lizard with a fixed clutch size: variation in a population of the Mediterranean gecko. Herpetologica 46: 15–21Google Scholar
  60. Semlitsch RD, Caldwell SJ (1982) Effects of density on growth, metamorphosis, and survivorship in tadpoles ofScaphiopus holbrooki. Ecology 63: 905–911Google Scholar
  61. Semlitsch RD, Gibbons JW (1990) Effects of egg size on success of larval salamanders in complex aquatic environments. Ecology 71: 1789–1795Google Scholar
  62. Semlitsch RD, Scott DE, Pechman JHK (1988) Time and size at metamorphosis related to adult fitness inAmbystoma talpoideum. Ecology 69: 184–192Google Scholar
  63. Shrode JB, Gerking SD (1977) Effect of constant and fluctuating temperatures on reproductive performance of a desert pupfish,Cyprinodon n nevadensis. Physiol Zool 50: 1–10Google Scholar
  64. Sinervo B (1990) The evolution of maternal investment in lizards: an experimental and comparative analysis of egg size and its effects on offspring performance. Evolution 44: 279–294Google Scholar
  65. Smith CK (1990) Effects of variation in body size on intraspecific competition among larval salamanders. Ecology 71: 1777–1788Google Scholar
  66. Smith CC, Fretwell SD (1974) The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am Nat 108: 499–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Smith DC (1987) Adult recruitment in chorus frogs: effects of size and date at metamorphosis. Ecology 68: 344–350Google Scholar
  68. Smith DC (1990) Population structure and competition among kin in the chorus frog (Pseudacris triseriata). Evolution 44: 1529–1541Google Scholar
  69. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2d ed. WH Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. Steinwascher K (1979) Competitive interactions among tadpoles: responses to resource level. Ecology 60: 1172–1183Google Scholar
  71. Taigen TL, Pough FH (1981) Activity metabolism of the toad (Bufo americanus): ecological consequences of ontogenetic change. J Comp Physiol 144: 247–252Google Scholar
  72. Takahashi H, Iwasawa H (1988) Interpopulation variations in clutch size and egg size in the Japanese salamander,Hynobius nigrescens. Zool Sci (Tokyo) 5: 1073–1081Google Scholar
  73. Tessier AJ, Consolatti NL (1989) Variation in offspring size inDaphnia and consequences for individual fitness. Oikos 56: 269–276Google Scholar
  74. Thomas CS (1983) The relationships between breeding experience, egg volume and reproductive success of the kittiwakeRissa tridactyla. Ibis 125: 567–574Google Scholar
  75. Travis J (1983) Variation in growth and survival ofHyla gratiosa larvae in experimental enclosures. Copeia 1983: 232–237Google Scholar
  76. Travis J (1984) Anuran size at metamorphosis: expeimental test of a model based on intraspecific competition. Ecology 65: 1155–1160Google Scholar
  77. Venable DL, Brown JS (1988) The selective interactions of dispersal, dormancy, and seed size as adaptations for reducing risk in variable environments. Am Nat 131: 360–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wassersug RJ, Sperry DG (1977) The relationship of locomotion to differential predation onPseudacris triseriata (Anura: Hylidae). Ecology 68: 830–839Google Scholar
  79. Wilbur HM (1977) Density-dependent aspects of growth and metamorphosis inBufo americanus. Ecology 58: 196–200Google Scholar
  80. Wilbur HM (1980) Complex life cycles. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11: 67–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wilbur HM, Collins JP (1973) Ecological aspects of amphibian metamorphosis. Science 182: 1305–1314Google Scholar
  82. Wilbur HM, Morin PJ, Harris RN (1983) Salamander predation and the structure of experimental communities: anuran responses. Ecology 64: 1423–1429Google Scholar
  83. Williamson I, Bull CM (1989) Life history variation in a population of the Australian frogRanidella signifera: egg size and early development. Copeia 1989: 349–356Google Scholar
  84. Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles in experimental design, 2d ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  85. Winkler DW, Wallin K (1987) Offspring size and number: a life history model linking effort per offspring and total effort. Am Nat 129: 708–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Woodward BD (1983) Tadpole size and predation in the Chihuahuan desert. Southwest Nat 28: 470–471Google Scholar
  87. Woodward BD (1987) Interactions between Woodhouse's toad tadpoles (Bufo woodhousii) of mixed sizes. Copeia 1987: 380–386Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Parichy
    • 1
  • Robert H. Kaplan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyReed CollegePortlandUSA
  2. 2.Section of Zoology and Center for Population BiologyUniversity of California at DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations