A self-consistent model of the magnetosphere with centrifugal wind, I
- 24 Downloads
- 4 Citations
Abstract
Under the purely centrifugal approximation (gravity and pressure force are neglected), stellar magnetospheres are classified into three main types of different physical properties in the two-dimensional parameter space. They are characterized essentially by the strength of the magnetic field and the plasma density, at the base of the magnetosphere. Among the three types, the type II magnetosphere has moderate surface densities for a given field strength, and is expected to possess a centrifugal wind blowing across the magnetic field lines without affecting them appreciably. Such a situation may be realized through a modification of the electric field from that under the ideal-MHD condition, owing to the inertia of a plasma. In order to illustrate this mechanism, the type II magnetosphere is taken up for a numerical simulation. The effect of artificial viscosity is avoided by integrating the characteristic equations for both components of the plasma, instead of solving the fluid equations directly. Our model reproduces a disk-like outflow of the centrifugal wind across the magnetic field lines which are closed through the equatorial plane.
Keywords
Viscosity Magnetic Field Parameter Space Field Strength Characteristic EquationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Cohen, J. M., Kegeles, L. S., and Rosenblum, A.: 1975,Astrophys. J. 201, 783.Google Scholar
- Fawley, W. M., Arons, J., and Scharlemann, E. T.: 1977,Astrophys. J. 217, 227.Google Scholar
- Goldreich, P. and Julian, W. H.: 1969,Astrophys. J. 157, 869.Google Scholar
- Hill, T. W.: 1976,Planetary Space Sci. 24, 1151.Google Scholar
- Jackson, E. A.: 1976,Astrophys. J. 206, 831.Google Scholar
- Kaburaki, O.: 1981,Astrophys. Space Sci. 74, 333.Google Scholar
- Kaburaki, O.: 1982,Astrophys. Space Sci. 82, 441.Google Scholar
- Kaburaki, O.: 1983,Astrophys. Space Sci. 92, 113.Google Scholar
- Kaburaki, O.: 1984, preprint.Google Scholar
- Krimigis, S. M., Armstrong, T. P., Axford, W. I., Bostrom, C. O., Fan, C. Y., Gloeckler, G., Lanzerotti, L. J., Keath, E. P., Zwickl, R. D., Carbary, J. F., and Hamilton, D. C.: 1979,Science 206, 977.Google Scholar
- Kuo-Petravic, L. G., Petravic, M., and Roberts, K. V.: 1974,Phys. Rev. Letters 32, 1019.Google Scholar
- Kuo-Petravic, L. G., Petravic, M., and Roberts, K. V.: 1975,Astrophys. J. 202, 762.Google Scholar
- Landstreet, J. D. and Borra, E. F.: 1978,Astrophys. J. 224, L5.Google Scholar
- McNutt, R. L., Belcher, J. W., and Bridge, H. S.: 1981,J. Geophys. Res. 86, 8319.Google Scholar
- Melrose, D. B.: 1967,Planetary Space Sci. 15, 381.Google Scholar
- Mestel, L., Phillips, P., and Wang, Y.-M.: 1979,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 188, 385.Google Scholar
- Michel, F. C.: 1974,Astrophys. J. 192, 713.Google Scholar
- Michel, F. C.: 1982,Rev. Modern Phys. 54, 1.Google Scholar
- Pneumann, G. W. and Kopp, R. A.: 1971,Solar Phys. 18, 258.Google Scholar
- Ruffini, R. and Treves, A.: 1973,Astrophys. Letters 13, 109.Google Scholar
- Rylov, Y. A.: 1977,Astrophys. Space Sci. 51, 59.Google Scholar
- Shibata, S., Kaburaki, O., and Okazaki, M.: 1980,Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. 8th Ser. 1, 161.Google Scholar
- Smoluchowski, R.: 1976, in T. Gehrels (ed.),Jupiter: Studies of the Interior. Atmosphere. Magnetosphere. and Satellites, Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
- Sturrock, P. A.: 1979,Nature 227, 645.Google Scholar