Application of a chemical equilibrium model to thermodynamic functions of transfer of alcohols from water to aqueous surfactants
- 75 Downloads
- 23 Citations
Abstract
In ternary aqueous solutions, hydrophobic solutes such as alcohols tend to aggregate with surfactants to form mixed micelles. These systems can be studied by meas of the functions of transfer of hydrophobic solutes from water to aqueous solutions of surfactant. These thermodynamic functions often go through extrema in the critical micellar concentration (CMC) region of the surfactant. A simple model based on interactions between surfactant and hydrophobic solute monomers, on the distribution of the hydrophobic solute between water and the micelles and on the shift in the CMC induced by the hydrophobic solute, can simulate the magnitude and trends of the transfer functions using parameters which are mostly derived from the binary systems. In order to check the model more quantitatively, volumes and heat capacities of transfer of alcohols from water to aqueous solutions of a nonionic surfactant, octyldimethylamine oxide, were measured. A quantitative agreement was achieved with three adjustable parameters. Good fits are also obtained for the transfers to the ionic surfactants, octylamine hydrobromide and sodium dodecylsulfate. When the equilibrium displacement contribution is small, the distribution constants and the partial molar properties of the alcohols in the micellar phase agree well with the parameters obtained with similar models.
Key words
Mixed micelles surfactants alcohols thermodynamic transfer functions volume heat capacity hydrophobic solutes chemical equilibrium model and distribution constantPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Phenomena in Mixed Surfactant Systems, J. F. Scamehorn ed., ACS Symposium series, No. 311 (1986).Google Scholar
- 2.G. Perron, R. DeLisi, I. Davidson, S. Généreux, and J. E. Desnoyers,J. Coll. Interf. Sci. 79, 432 (1981).Google Scholar
- 3.J. Lara, G. Perron, and J. E. Desnoyers,J. Phys. Chem. 85, 1600 (1981).Google Scholar
- 4.J. Lara, L. Avedikian, G. Perron, and J. E. Desnoyers,J. Solution Chem. 10, 301 (1981).Google Scholar
- 5.J. E. Desnoyers, D. Hétu, and G. Perron,J. Solution Chem. 12, 427 (1983).Google Scholar
- 6.R. Bury and C. Treiner,J. Coll. Interf. Sci. 103, 1 (1985).Google Scholar
- 7.M. Manabe, S. Kikuchi, S. Katayama, S. Takunaga, and M. Koda,Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 57, 2027 (1984).Google Scholar
- 8.V. Majer, A. H. Roux, G. Roux-Desgranges, and A. ViallardCan. J. Chem. 61, 139 (1983).Google Scholar
- 9.G. Roux-Desgranges, A. H. Roux, J.-P. E. Grolier, and A. Viallard,J. Solution Chem. 11, 357 (1982).Google Scholar
- 10.R. DeLisi, C., Genova, and V. T. Liveri,J. Coll. Interf. Sci. 95, 428 (1983).Google Scholar
- 11.R. DeLisi, C. Genova, R. Testa, and V. T. Liveri,J. Solution Chem. 13, 121 (1984).Google Scholar
- 12.F. Yamashita, G. Perron, J. E. Desnoyers, and J. C. T. Kwak, Ref. 1Phenomena in Mixed Surfactant Systems, J. F. Scamehorn ed., ACS Symposium series, No. 311 (1986) Chap. 6, p. 79.Google Scholar
- 13.A. H. Roux, D. Hétu, G. Perron, and J. E. Desnoyers,J. Solution Chem. 13, 1 (1984).Google Scholar
- 14.S. D. Christian, E. E. Tucker, and E. H. Lane,J. Coll. Interf. Sci. 84, 423 (1981); see also E. E. Tucker and S. D. Christian,Faraday Symp. Chem. Soc. 17, 11 (1982).Google Scholar
- 15.R. DeLisi and V. T. Liveri,Gaz. Chim. Ital. 113, 371, (1983).Google Scholar
- 16.C. Treiner,J. Coll. Interf. Sci. 90, 444 (1982).Google Scholar
- 17.D. Hétu, A. H. Roux and J. E. Desnoyers,J. Coll. Interf. Sci., in press.Google Scholar
- 18.J. E. Desnoyers, G. Caron, R. DeLisi, D. Roberts, A. Roux, and G. Perron,J. Phys. Chem. 87, 1397 (1983).Google Scholar
- 19.D. Hétu, M. Sc. Thesis, Sherbrooke (1981).Google Scholar
- 20.P. Picker, E. Tremblay, and C. JolicoeurJ. Solution Chem. 3, 377 (1974).Google Scholar
- 21.L. Avédikian, G. Perron, and J. E. Desnoyers,J. Solution Chem. 4, 331 (1975).Google Scholar
- 22.P. Picker, P.-A. Leduc, P. Philip, and J. E. Desnoyers,J. Chem. Thermodyn. 3, 631 (1971).Google Scholar
- 23.H. Bahri and P. Letellier,J. Chim. Phys. 82, 803 (1985).Google Scholar
- 24.F. Yamashita, G. Perron, J. E. Desnoyers, and J. C. T. Kwak,J. Coll. Interf. Sci. 114, 548 (1986).Google Scholar
- 25.R. DeLisi, V. T. Liveri, M. Castagnolo, and A. Inglese,J. Solution Chem. 15, 23 (1986); see also R. DeLisi, A. Lezzio, S. Milioto, and V. T. Liveri,J. Solution Chem. 15, 623 (1986).Google Scholar
- 26.D. Hétu, Ph.D. Thesis, Sherbrooke, (1986).Google Scholar
- 27.K. S. Birdi, S. Backlund, K. Sorenson, T. Krag, and S. Dalsager,J. Coll. Interf. Sci. 66, 118 (1978).Google Scholar
- 28.H. N. Singh, S. Singh, D. S. MahalwarJ. Coll. Interf. Sci. 59, 386 (1977).Google Scholar
- 29.G. Caron and J. E. Desnoyers,J. Coll. Interf. Sci., in press.Google Scholar
- 30.K. Hayase and S. Hayano,Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 50, 83 (1977).Google Scholar
- 31.M. Manabe, K. Sherahama, and M. Koda,Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 49, 2904 (1976).Google Scholar
- 32.E. B. Abuin, E. Valenzuela, and E. A. Lissi,J. Coll. Interf. Sci. 101, 401 (1984);95, 198 (1983).Google Scholar
- 33.J. E. Desnoyers, D. Roberts, R. DeLisi, and G. Perron, inSolution Behavior of Surfactants, K. L. Mittal and E. J. Fendler ed., (Plenum, New York, 1982).Google Scholar
- 34.D. Hétu, A. H. Roux, G. Perron, and J. E. Desnoyers, in preparation.Google Scholar