Advertisement

Solar Physics

, Volume 149, Issue 1, pp 149–154 | Cite as

On the stability of the 11-year solar cycle period (and a few others)

  • J. P. Rozelot
Article

Abstract

The existence of an 11.1-yr periodic variation in the sunspot number record has been recognized for many years; however, periodicities other than this remain questionable. Power spectral analysis of the International sunspot number is performed and the results are compared with those for the same period using values that were taken randomly inside the error bars. The findings are that only a few periodicities show noticeable peaks. These include periodicities of 8.49, 10.01, 10.58, 11.10, 12.50, 58.50, and 97.20 yr. On the basis of these seven periodicities, one can loosely simulate the observable sunspot record (r = 0.75). We find that discrepancies in number and value of periodicities with other authors appear to be related to the length of the sunspot record used in the analysis and to the occurrence of 0.3-yr windows around the inferred periodicities.

Keywords

Spectral Analysis Solar Cycle Sunspot Number Periodic Variation Cycle Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Attolini, M. R., Cecchini, S., Galli, M., and Nanni, T.: 1990,Solar Phys. 125, 389.Google Scholar
  2. Bouwer, S. D.: 1992,Solar Phys. 142, 365.Google Scholar
  3. Cole, T. W.: 1973,Solar Phys. 30, 103.Google Scholar
  4. Currie, R. G.: 1973,Astrophys. Space Sci. 20, 509.Google Scholar
  5. De Meyer, F.: 1984,Solar Phys. 70, 259.Google Scholar
  6. Fairbridge, R. W. and Shirley, J. H.: 1987,Solar Phys. 111, 191.Google Scholar
  7. Hill, J. R.: 1977,Nature 266, 151.Google Scholar
  8. Olivier, R., Carbonell, M., and Ballester, J. L.: 1992,Solar Phys. 137, 141.Google Scholar
  9. Otaola, J. A. and Zenteno, G.: 1983,Solar Phys. 89, 209.Google Scholar
  10. Pap, J., Yobiska, W. K., and Bouwer, S. D.: 1990,Solar Phys. 129, 65.Google Scholar
  11. Sneyers, R.: 1975,Note Technique N o 143,‘Sur l'analyse statistique des séries d'observations’, OMM, p. 145.Google Scholar
  12. Sneyers, R.: 1976,J. Appl. Meteor. 15, 387.Google Scholar
  13. Schwentek, H. and Elling, W.: 1984,Solar Phys. 93, 403.Google Scholar
  14. Wallenhorst, S. G.: 1982,Solar Phys. 80, 379.Google Scholar
  15. Wilson, R. M.: 1988,J. Geophys. Res. 93, 10011.Google Scholar
  16. Wolf, R.: 1968,Astron. Mitt. Zürich 24, 110.Google Scholar
  17. Wolff, C. L.: 1976,Astrophys. J. 205, 612.Google Scholar
  18. Wolff, C. L.: 1992,Solar Phys. 142, 187.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. P. Rozelot
    • 1
  1. 1.OCA/CERGAGrasseFrance

Personalised recommendations