Astrophysics and Space Science

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 459–510 | Cite as

The weak friction approximation and tidal evolution in close binary systems

  • M. E. Alexander


The aim of this paper is to study the dynamical problem of tidal friction in a binary system consisting of deformable components, with the restriction that the angle of lag or advance of the tidal distortion with respect to the direction of the disturbing companion is small. The fractional distortion of the bodies due to rotation and tidal interaction is also treated as a first-order small quantity, and terms up to the fourth harmonic in the tidal potential are retained. In this linear approximation, the time-dependent tidal potential can be Fourier decomposed into a spectrum of simple harmonic terms, each of which is responsible for raising a ‘partial wave’ in the body; each such partial wave can then be treated independently of the others. This is the method first employed by Darwin.

In Section 2, it is assumed that the phase lag in the response of the body (due to dissipation of kinetic energy of deformation) is proportional to the forcing frequency, which is justified for small amplitude oscillations of a viscous fluid or visco-elastic body. A simple expression is then obtained for the potential function for the distortion in terms of the disturbing potential and the structure of the body.

In Section 3, the distortion potential function is employed in deriving the componentsR, S andW of the disturbing force which are then substituted in the Gaussian form of the equations for variation of the elements. In Section 4, the Eulerian equations for motion of deformable bodies are derived, using the so-called ‘mean axes’ of the body as the rotating axes of reference. In Section 5, it is shown that the dynamical effects of rotational distortion occur on a much shorter time scale than those arising from tidal friction, which allows one to consider the two phenomena as acting independently of one another. The collected set of Gaussian (orbital) and Eulerian (body) equations is re-written in terms of dimensionless variables for the tidal friction case, and the stability of the system is examined on the basis of these equations.

In Section 6, the tidal friction equations are integrated numerically for the close binary system AG Persei and for the Earth-Moon system. In the former, the integrations were started from a highly elliptical orbit and the system was found to relax into a circular orbit, with synchronous rotation perpendicular to the orbit. In the latter, the integrations were performed backwards in time from the present day, and it was found that the lunar orbit rapidly becomes highly elliptical at the time of closest approach, thus indicating a probable capture of the Moon by the Earth. This result is in agreement with that obtained by other investigators; however, it is shown that the detailed behaviour of the system at the time of capture, in particular the inclination of the lunar orbit to the ecliptic, depends critically on the chosen rate of dissipation in the Moon's interior. A simple argument is presented which allows an estimation for the mean viscosity of a fluid body from the known age of the system: for the components of AG per, the result is 2×1011 g cm−1 s−1, indicating that the stars must have possessed turbulent convective outer regions during some part of their tidal evolution, while for the Earth, the result, is 1.4×1012 g cm−1 s−1. It is shown that the angle of tidal lag in nonsynchronous close binary systems in general is expected to be extremely small, and not observationally detectable.


Partial Wave Lunar Orbit Close Binary System Small Amplitude Oscillation Disturbing Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blaauw, A.: 1952,B.A.N. 11, 405.Google Scholar
  2. Brooker, R. A. and Olle, T. W.: 1955,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 115, 101.Google Scholar
  3. Brouwer, D. and Clemence, G.: 1961,Methods of Celestial Mechanics, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Colombo, G. and Shapiro, I. I.: 1966,Astrophys. J. 145, 296.Google Scholar
  5. Darwin, G. H.: 1879a,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 170, 1–35 (Paper 1).Google Scholar
  6. Darwin, G. H.: 1879b,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 170, 447–530 (Paper 3).Google Scholar
  7. Darwin, G. H.: 1879c,Proc. Roy. Soc. 29, 168–181 (Paper 5).Google Scholar
  8. Darwin, G. H.: 1880,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 171, 713–891 (Paper 6).Google Scholar
  9. Gerstenkorn, H.: 1955,Z. Astrophys. 36, 245–274.Google Scholar
  10. Gerstenkorn, H.: 1967,Icarus 6, 92–109.Google Scholar
  11. Goldreich, P.: 1967, in S. Runcorn (ed.),Mantles of the Earth and Terrestrial Planets, Ch. V, Section 6.Google Scholar
  12. Goldreich, P. and Peale, S. J.: 1968,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 6, 287–320.Google Scholar
  13. Hadjidemetriou, J.: 1967,Adv. Astron. Astrophys. 5, 131–188, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Jeffreys, H.: 1930,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 91, 169–173.Google Scholar
  15. Jeffreys, H.: 1959,The Earth, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 4th Ed.Google Scholar
  16. Kopal, Z.: 1959,Close Binary Systems, Chapter II, Chapman-Hall and John Wiley, London and New York.Google Scholar
  17. Kopal, Z.: 1960,Figures of Equilibrium of Celestial Bodies, Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wis.Google Scholar
  18. Kopal, Z.: 1965,Adv. Astron. Astrophys. 3, 89–118, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Kopal, Z.: 1968a,Astrophys. Space Sci. 1, 411–423.Google Scholar
  20. Kopal, Z.: 1968b,Astrophys. Space Sci. 2, 48–60.Google Scholar
  21. Kopal, Z.: 1969a,Astrophys. Space Sci. 4, 330–364.Google Scholar
  22. Kopal, Z.: 1969b,Astrophys. Space Sci. 4, 427–458.Google Scholar
  23. Kopal, Z.: 1972a,Astrophys. Space Sci. 17, 161–185.Google Scholar
  24. Kopal, Z.: 1972b,Astrophys. Space Sci. 18, 287–305.Google Scholar
  25. Kopal, Z. and Shapley, M. B.: 1956,Jodrell Bank Ann. 1, 139–221.Google Scholar
  26. Lamb, H.: 1932,Hydrodynamics 6th ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, Sect. 329.Google Scholar
  27. MacDonald, G. J. F.: 1964,Rev. Geophys. 2, 467–540.Google Scholar
  28. Morse, P. M. and Feshbach, H.: 1953,Methods of Theoretical Physics I, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Munk, W. H. and MacDonald, G. J. F.: 1960,The Rotation of the Earth, Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  30. Urey, H., Elsasser, W. M., and Rochester, M. G.: 1959,Astrophys. J. 129, 842–848.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. E. Alexander
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of AstronomyUniv. of ManchesterEngland

Personalised recommendations