Advertisement

Solar Physics

, Volume 148, Issue 2, pp 383–388 | Cite as

A technique for predicting the amplitude of the solar cycle

  • R. J. Thompson
Article

Abstract

Predictions of the amplitude of the last three solar cycles have demonstrated the value and accuracy of the group of prediction methods known as the ‘precursor’ techniques. These are based on a correlation between cycle amplitude and phenomena observed on the Sun, or originating from the Sun, during the declining phase of the cycle or at solar minimum. In many cases, precursor predictions make use of the long record of geomagnetic disturbance indices, assuming that these indices are indicative of solar phenomena such as the occurrence of coronal holes.

This paper describes a precursor technique for predicting the amplitude of the solar cycle using geomagnetic indices. The technique is accurate — it would have predicted each of the last 11 cycles with a typical error of less than 20 in sunspot number. It has also advantage that a prediction of the lower limit of the amplitude can be made throughout the declining phase, this limit building to a final value at the onset of the new cycle.

Keywords

Lower Limit Solar Cycle Prediction Method Coronal Hole Typical Error 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, G. M.: 1984, in P. A. Simon, G. R. Heckman, and M. A. Shea (eds.),Proceedings of the Meudon Solar Terrestrial Predictions Workshop, NOAA, Boulder, p. 1.Google Scholar
  2. Kunches, J.: 1993, in J. Hruškaet al. (eds.),Proceedings of the Ottawa Solar Terrestrial Predictions Workshop, NOAA, Boulder, in press.Google Scholar
  3. Gleissberg, W.: 1942,Astrophys. J. 96, 234.Google Scholar
  4. Legrand, J. P. and Simon, P. A.: 1991,Solar Phys. 131, 187.Google Scholar
  5. Martin, S. F. and Harvey, K. L.: 1979,Solar Phys. 64, 93.Google Scholar
  6. Mayaud, P. W.: 1980,Geophysical Monograph Number 22, American Geophysical Union.Google Scholar
  7. Simon, P. A. and Legrand, J. P.: 1992,Solar Phys. 141, 391.Google Scholar
  8. Sýkora, J.: 1992,Solar Phys. 140, 379.Google Scholar
  9. Thompson, R. J.: 1985, IPS Technical Report IPS-TR-85-06, IPS Radio and Space Services, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  10. Thompson, R. J.: 1988,Solar Phys. 117, 279.Google Scholar
  11. Thompson, R. J.: 1993, in J. Hruškaet al. (eds.),Proceedings of the Ottawa Solar Terrestrial Predictions Workshop, NOAA Boulder, in press.Google Scholar
  12. Wilson, P. R.: 1990, in R. J. Thompsonet al. (eds.),Proceedings of the Leura Solar Terrestrial Predictions Workshop, NOAA, Boulder, p. 257.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. J. Thompson
    • 1
  1. 1.IPS Radio and Space ServicesWest ChatswoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations