Advertisement

Astrophysics and Space Science

, Volume 243, Issue 1, pp 77–81 | Cite as

Anisotropic angular broadening in the solar wind

  • A. K. R. Anantharamaiah
  • B. Pradeep Gothoskar
  • C. T. J. Cornwell
Coronal Heating and Solar Wind Acceleration
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

We present Very Large Array observations at wavelengths of 2, 3.5, 6, and 20 cm, of angular broadening of radio sources due to the solar wind in the region 2–16 solar radii. Angular broadening is anisotropic with axial ratios in the range 2–16. Larger axial ratios are observed preferentially at smaller solar distances. Assuming that anisotropy is due to scattering blobs elongated along magnetic field lines, the distribution of position angles of the elliptically broadened images indicates that the field lines are non-radial even at the largest heliocentric distances observed here. At 5R, the major axis scattering angle is ∼0.7″ at λ=6 cm and it varies with heliocentric distance asR−1.6. The level of turbulence, characterized by the wave structure function at a scale of 10 km along the major axis, normalized to λ=20 cm, has a value 20±7 at 5R and varies with heliocentric distance asR−3. Comprison with earlier results suggest that the level of turbulence is higher during solar maximum. Assuming a power-law spectrum of electron density fluctuations, the fitted spectral exponents have values in the range 2.8–3.4 for scales sizes between 2–35 km. The data suggests temporal fluctuations (of up to 10%) in the spectral exponent on a time scale of a few tens of minutes. The observed structure functions at different solar distances do not show any evidence for an inner scale; the upper limits are 1 km at 2R and 4 km at 13R. These upper limits are in conflict with earlier determinations and may suggest a reduced inner scale during solar maximum.

Keywords

Solar Wind Structure Function Field Line Major Axis Radio Source 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anantharamaiah K.R., Gothoskar, P. and Cornwell, T.J. 1994,J. Astrophys. Astr. 15, 387Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, J.W., Coles, W.A., Kojima, M. and Rickett, B.J. 1990,Astrophys. J.,358, 692Google Scholar
  3. Coles, W.A. and Harmon, J.K. 1989,Astrophys. J.,337, 102Google Scholar
  4. Goodman, J. and Narayan, R. 1989,Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 238, 995Google Scholar
  5. Hewish, A. 1958,Mon. Not. Roy. astr. Soc.,118, 534Google Scholar
  6. Lotova, N.A., Medvedeva, O.P., Kazimirskii, P.B., Sololeva, N.S. and Naugol'naya, M.N. 1989,Sov. Astron. 33, 333Google Scholar
  7. Manoharan, P.K., Kojima, M. and Misawa, H. 1994,J. Geophys. Res. (in press)Google Scholar
  8. Narayan, R., Cornwell, T.J., Goodman, J. and Anantharamaiah, K.R. 1990 inRadio Astronomical Seeing, ed. J.E. Baldwin and W. Shouguan, International, Academic Press (Beijing)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. K. R. Anantharamaiah
    • 1
  • B. Pradeep Gothoskar
    • 2
  • C. T. J. Cornwell
    • 3
  1. 1.Raman Research InstituteBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.National Center for Radio AstrophysicsPuneIndia
  3. 3.National Radio Astronomy ObservatorySocorroUSA

Personalised recommendations