Astrophysics and Space Science

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 212–237 | Cite as

Paleontological evidence on the Earth's rotational history since early precambrian

  • Giorgio Pannella
Article

Abstract

The daily growth layers arranged into seasonal and tidal patterns, present in calcified structures of many modern as well as fossil organisms, provide evidence on the length of lunar month and year in the geological past.

The data presented are mainly from molluscan shells and indicate that the number of days per lunar month and per year has decreased significantly since Ordovician time. The change possibly has not taken place at a uniform rate.

Banding and periodical patterns in stromatolites reflect cycles of daily, tidal, and seasonal nature, but rarely, if ever, represent a complete growth record. Such lack of completeness is a function of many parameters like water depth, energy of the environment, biological and physical disruptions, which are not always determinable in fossils. Phanerozoic stromatolites show a higher degree of incompleteness than precambrian ones. Figures obtained from stromatolites counts cannot be compared to those from molluscs. Preliminary data indicate that the length of the synodic month during Gunflint time (≥1750 m.y. ago) was between 36 and 39 days. The oldest known stromatolites (≃ 2800 m.y.) show patterns that are interpreted as due to tidal influence and have a periodicity of 10, 20 and 40 laminae. The obvious conclusions are that the Moon has been associated with Earth since at least Early Precambrian times, that all theories implying a late capture of the Moon should be revised and that the calculated secular changes in the Earth's rotation rate cannot be accepted as representative for the all geological history.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldrich, L. T., Davis, G. L., and James, H. L.: 1965,J. Petrology 6, 445–72.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, R. M.: 1964,Malacologia 2, 69–86.Google Scholar
  3. Berry, A. J.: 1962,Proc. Malac. Soc. Lond. 35, 46–49.Google Scholar
  4. Berry, W. and Barker, R. M.: 1968,Nature 217, 938–9.Google Scholar
  5. Bradley, W. H.: 1929, USGS Prof. Pap., 154-G, pp. 203–23.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, G. R.: 1968,Science 161, 800–2.Google Scholar
  7. Cloud, P. E., Jr.: 1968,Science 160, 729–36.Google Scholar
  8. Douglass, A. E.: 1946,Bull. Univ. of Utah,37, 1–19.Google Scholar
  9. Faure, Gunter and Kovach, Jack: 1969,Can. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 80, 1725–36.Google Scholar
  10. Gebelein, C. D.: 1969,Bermuda J. Sed. Petrol. 39, 49.Google Scholar
  11. Harland, W. B., Smith, A. G., and Wilcock, B. (eds.): 1964,Quart. J. Geol. Soc. London, No. 120.Google Scholar
  12. Hofmann, H. J.: 1969.Geol. Sur. Can., Paper 68-69, pp. 1–77.Google Scholar
  13. House, R. M. and Farrow, G. E.: 1968,Nature 219, 1384–6.Google Scholar
  14. Joliffe, A. W.: 1955,Econ. Geol. 50, 373–98.Google Scholar
  15. Lamar, D. L. and Merifield, P. M.: 1966,J. Geophys. Res. 71, 4429–30.Google Scholar
  16. Lamar, D. L. and Merifield, P. M.: 1967,G.S.A. Bull. 78, 1359–68.Google Scholar
  17. McGugan, A.: 1967, inAbstr. Ann. Meeting Geol. Soc. Amer., 145.Google Scholar
  18. MacClintock, C. and Pannella, G.: 1969, inAbstr. Ann. Meeting Geol. Soc. Am., p. 140.Google Scholar
  19. MacClintock, C. and Pannella, G.: 1972, ‘Time of Calcification inMercenaria mercenaria’, in preparation, publication expected in 1972.Google Scholar
  20. Mazzullo, S. J.: 1971,Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 82, 1085–6.Google Scholar
  21. Merifield, P. M. and Lamar, D. L.: 1968,J. Geophys. Res. 73, 4767–74.Google Scholar
  22. Merifield, P. M. and Laman, D. L.: in S. K. Runcorn (ed.),Paleogeophysics, Academic Press, London, New York, pp. 25–30.Google Scholar
  23. Monty, C. L. V.: 1965,Ann. Soc. Geol. Belg. 88, 269–76.Google Scholar
  24. Monty, C. L. V.: 1967,Ann. Soc. Geol. Belg.,90, 55–102.Google Scholar
  25. Newton, R. R.: 1969,Science 166, 825–31.Google Scholar
  26. Obradovich, J. D. and Peterman, Z. E.: 1968,Can. J. Earth Sci. 5, 737–47.Google Scholar
  27. Pannella, G.: 1972a, ‘Precambrian Stromatolites as Paleontological Clocks’,Proceed. 24 Intern. Geol. Congress (in press).Google Scholar
  28. Pannella, G.: 1972b, ‘Considerations on Paleontological Clocks’, in preparation.Google Scholar
  29. Pannella, G. and MacClintock, C.: 1968,J. Paleontol. 42 (suppl.), 64–80.Google Scholar
  30. Pannella, G., MacClintock, C., and Thompson, M.: 1968,Science 162, 792–6.Google Scholar
  31. Perttunen, V.: 1968, in S. K. Runcorn (ed.),Paleogeophysics, Academic Press, London, New York, pp. 25–30.Google Scholar
  32. Runcorn, S. K.: 1964,Nature 204, 823–5.Google Scholar
  33. Runcorn, S. K.: 1966,Sci. Amer. 215, 26–33.Google Scholar
  34. Runcorn, S. K.: 1968,Nature 218, 459.Google Scholar
  35. Schopf, J. W., Oehler, D. Z., Horodyski, R. J., and Kvenvolden, K. A.: 1971,J. Paleontol. 45, 477–85.Google Scholar
  36. Sharp, J. H.: 1969,Limnol. Oceanogr. 14, 568–78.Google Scholar
  37. Thompson, I. L.: 1972, inAbstr. Am. Meet. Geol. Soc. Am., pp. 731–2.Google Scholar
  38. Wells, J. W.: 1963,Nature 197, 948–50.Google Scholar
  39. Wells, J. W.: 1966, in B. G. Marsden and A. G. W. Cameron (eds.),The Earth-Moon System, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 70–81.Google Scholar
  40. Wells, J. W.: 1968, in S. K. Runcorn (ed.),Paleogeophysics, Academic Press, London, New York, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giorgio Pannella
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geology-GeophysicsYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations