On the nature of PSE approximation

  • Fei Li
  • Mujeeb R. Malik
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The recently developed method of parabolized stability equations (PSE) offers a fast and efficient way of analyzing the spatial growth of linear and nonlinear (convective) disturbances in shear layers. For incompressible flows, the governing equations may be represented either in primitive variables or by using other formulations obtained by eliminating the pressure gradient (e.g., vorticity-streamfunction formulation). On the other hand, for compressible flows, primitive variables offer a natural and the only choice. We show that primitive-variable formulation is not well-posed due to the ellipticity introduced by the\(\partial \hat p/\partial x\) term and the marching solution eventually blows up for a sufficiently small step size. However, it is shown that this difficulty can be overcome if the minimum step size is greater than the inverse of the real part of the streamwise wave number, αr. An alternative is to drop the\(\partial \hat p/\partial x\) term, in which case the residual ellipticity is of no consequence for marching computations with much smaller step sizes. However, the ellipticity cannot be completely removed. Results obtained with streamfunction and vorticity-velocity formulations also show that the numerical difficulties arise for a sufficiently small marching step size. This step-size restriction can be overcome by dropping thedα/dx term from the governing equations. The effect of this term on solution accuracy is negligible for Blasius flow but not so for rotating-disk flow.

Keywords

Governing Equation Shear Layer Incompressible Flow Compressible Flow Numerical Difficulty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, D.A., Tannehill, J.C., and Pletcher, R.H. (1984),Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, Hemisphere, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Bender, C.M., and Orszag, S.A. (1978),Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bertolotti, F.P. (1993), PSE for Incompressible Flows, ICASE/LaRC Short Course on Transition, Newport News, VA, June 1–5.Google Scholar
  4. Bertolotti, F.P., Herbert, Th., and Spalart, P.R. (1992), Linear and nonlinear stability of the Blasius boundary layer,J. Fluid Mech.,242, 441–474.Google Scholar
  5. Carrier, G.F., and Pearson, C.E. (1976),Partial Differential Equations, Theory and Technique, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Chang, C.-L., and Malik, M.R. (1994), Oblique-mode breakdown and secondary instability in supersonic boundary layers,J. Fluid Mech.,273, 323–359.Google Scholar
  7. Chang, C.-L., Malik, M.R., Erlebacher, G., and Hussaini, M.Y. (1991), Compressible Stability of Growing Boundary Layers Using Parabolized Stability Equations, AIAA Paper 91-1636.Google Scholar
  8. Dhanak, M.R. (1992), Effect of suction of the stability of flow on a rotating disk, inInstability, Transition, and Turbulence, M.Y. Hussaini, A. Kumar, and C.L. Streett, eds., Springer-Verlag. New York, pp. 151–167.Google Scholar
  9. Fasel, H.F., and Konzelmann, U. (1990) Non-parallel stability of a flat plate boundary layer using the complete Navier-Stokes equations.J. Fluid Mech.,221, 331–347.Google Scholar
  10. Gaster M (1974), On the effects of boundary layer growth on flow stability,J. Fluid Mech.,66, 465–480.Google Scholar
  11. Golub, G.H., and Van Loan, C.F. (1983),Matrix Computations, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  12. Gregory, N., Stuart, J.T., and Walker, W.S. (1955), On the stability of three-dimensional boundary layers with application to the flow due to a rotating disk,Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A,248, 155–199.Google Scholar
  13. Haj-Hariri, H. (1994), Characteristics analysis of the parabolized stability equations.Stud. Appl. Math.,92, 41–53.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, P. (1994), A Phase Equation Approach to Boundary Layer Instability Theory, ICASE Report No. 94-23 (NASA CR-194901).Google Scholar
  15. Hall, P., and Smith, F.T. (1989), On Strongly Nonlinear Vortex/Wave Interactions in Boundary-Layer Transition, ICASE Report No. 89-82 (NASA CR-181963).Google Scholar
  16. Herbert, Th. (1991), Boundary-Layer Transition—Analysis and Prediction Revisited, AIAA Paper 91-0737.Google Scholar
  17. Herbert, Th. (1994), Parabolized Stability Equations, AGARD-R-793, p. 4–1.Google Scholar
  18. Joslin, R.D., Streett, C.L., and Chang, C.-L. (1992), 3-D Incompressible Spatial Direct Numerical Simulation Code Validation Study—A Comparison with Linear Stability and Parabolic Stability Equation Theories for Boundary-Layer Transition on a Flat Plate, NASA TP-3205.Google Scholar
  19. Kreiss, H.-O., and Lorenz, J. (1989),Initial-Boundary Value Problems and the Navier-Stokes Equations, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Li, F., and Malik, M.R. (1995), Fundamental and subharmonic secondary instabilities of Görtler vortices,J. Fluid Mech.,297, 77–100.Google Scholar
  21. Malik, M.R., and Balakumar, P. (1992), Nonparallel stability of rotating disk flow using PSE, inInstability, Transition, and Turbulence, M.Y. Hussaini, A. Kumar, and C.L. Streett, eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 168–180.Google Scholar
  22. Malik, M.R., Chuang, S., and Hussaini, M.Y. (1982), Accurate numerical solution of compressible stability equations,Z. Aagew. Math. Phys.,33, 189–201.Google Scholar
  23. Malik, M.R., Li, F., and Chang, C.-L. (1994), Crossflow disturbances in three-dimensional boundary layers: nonlinear development, wave interaction and secondary instability,J. Fluid Mech.,268, 1–36.Google Scholar
  24. Rubin, S.G. (1981), A review of marching procedures for parabolized Navier-Stokes equations,Proceedings of Symposium on Numerical and Physical Aspects of Aerodynamic Flows, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 171–186.Google Scholar
  25. Rubin, S.G., and Tannehill, J.C. (1992), Parabolized/reduced Navier-Stokes computational techniques,Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech.,24, 117–144.Google Scholar
  26. Saric, W.S., and Nayfeh, A.H. (1975), Non-parallel stability of boundary layer flows,Phys. Fluids,18, 945–950.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, F.T. (1979), On the non-parallel flow stability of the Blasius boundary layer,Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A.,366, 91–109.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, F.T., Papageorgiou, D., and Elliott, J.W. (1984), An alternative approach to linear and nonlinear stability calculations at finite Reynolds numbers,J. Fluid Mech.,146, 313–330.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fei Li
    • 1
  • Mujeeb R. Malik
    • 1
  1. 1.High Technology CorporationHamptonU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations