Astrophysics and Space Science

, Volume 246, Issue 1, pp 7–14 | Cite as

Hale-cycle effects in cosmic-ray intensity during the last four cycles

  • H. Mavromichalaki
  • A. Belehaki
  • X. Rafios
  • I. Tsagouri


Monthly cosmic-ray data from Inuvik (0.16 GV) and Climax (2.96 GV) Neutron Monitor stations has been studied with the aid of solar activity parameters for the time period 1947–1995. Systematic differences in the overall shape of successive 11-year modulation cycles and similarities in the alternate 11-year cycles seem to be related to the polarity reversals of the polar magnetic field of the Sun. This suggests a possible effectiveness of the Hale cycle during even and odd solar activity cycles. Our results can be understood in terms of open and closed models of the heliosphere. Positive north pole of the Sun leads to open heliosphere where particles reach the Earth more easily when their access route is by the heliospheric oolar regions (even cycles) than when they gain access along the current sheet (odd cycles). In this case as the route of access becomes longer due to the waviness of the neutral sheet, the hysteresis effect of cosmic-rays is also longer. This interpretation is explained in terms of different contributions of convection, diffusion and drift mechanisms to the whole modulation process influencing cosmic-ray transport in the heliosphere.


Solar Activity Current Sheet Neutron Monitor Access Route North Pole 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahluwalia, H.S.: 1979,Proc. 19th ICRC (Paris)5, 182.Google Scholar
  2. Ahluwalia, H.S.: 1995,Proc. 2nd SOLTIP Sym. 5, 247.Google Scholar
  3. Babcock, H.W.: 1961,Astrophys. J. 133, 57.Google Scholar
  4. Gnevyshev, M.N.: 1977,Sol. Phys. 51, 175.Google Scholar
  5. Feminella, F. and Storini, M.: 1995,Proc. 9th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems and the Sun, (Florence).Google Scholar
  6. Jokipii, J.R. and Thomas, B.: 1981,Astrophys. J. 243, 1115.Google Scholar
  7. Marmatsouri, L., Vassilaki, A. and Mavromichalaki, H.: 1995,Adv. Space Res. 16, 245.Google Scholar
  8. Mavromichalaki, H., Marmatsouri, E. and Vassilaki, A.: 1988,Earth, Moon and Planets 42, 233.Google Scholar
  9. Nagashima, K. and Morishita, J.: 1980,Planet. Space Sci. 28, 195.Google Scholar
  10. Otaola, J.R., Perez Enriquez, R. and Valdes-Galicia, J.F.: 1985, Proc. 19th ICRC (La Jolla)4, 93.Google Scholar
  11. Smart, U.A. and Shea, D.F.: 1981, Adv. Space Res.1, 147.Google Scholar
  12. Webber, W.R. and Lockwood, J.A.: 1988,J. Geophys. Res. 93, 8735.Google Scholar
  13. Webber, W.R. and Lockwood, J.A.: 1993,J. Geophys. Res. 98, 21095.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Mavromichalaki
    • 1
  • A. Belehaki
    • 2
  • X. Rafios
    • 1
  • I. Tsagouri
    • 1
  1. 1.Nuclear and Particle Physics SectionAthens UniversityAthens
  2. 2.Space Research InstAthens National ObservatoryP. Penteli

Personalised recommendations