Physical work load, physical capacity and strain among elderly female aides in home-care service

  • Margareta Torgén
  • Clas-Håkan Nygård
  • Åsa Kilbom
Original Article

Abstract

A study was undertaken to investigate physical work load, physical capacity, physical strain and perceived health among elderly aides in home-care service. A secondary aim was to compare the work load and strain between the two main types of home-care service available in Sweden today. Work tasks and their distribution among 20 elderly aides (aged 45–65 years), working in open home-care service (clients living in their original flats or houses) and at service apartment houses (clients living in private flats constructed for the elderly and handicapped with service functions) were observed during whole work days. Heart rate and number of steps taken were also measured continuously during the whole work day. Oxygen consumption and work postures for upper arm and back were measured during parts of the work day. The results showed that home-care work is characterised by long periods of standing and walking and that postures potentially harmful for the low back and shoulders occurred frequently. Average physiological strain measured as relative oxygen consumption and heart rate during the work day did not exceed present recommendations. Average physical work load and strain in open home-care service slightly exceeded those in service apartment houses because of more frequent cleaning and walking outdoors. Many aides in this study showed slightly reduced physical capacity, and musculoskeletal problems were common. Many elderly aides in home-care service are probably exposed at work to high risks of overexertion and impaired health as a result of high postural loads in combination with other known important factors, such as time stress and lack of equipment.

Key words

Age Home-care work Physical capacity Physical work load Strain 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aarås A, Stranden E (1988) Measurement of postural angels during work. Ergonomics 31:935–944Google Scholar
  2. Alaranta H, Soukka A, Harju R, Heliövaara M (1990) Improvement of the diagnostics of musculoskeletal diseases:measuring the capacity of back and neck and shoulders in the occupational health service (in Finnish with summary in English). Tyosuojelurahasten julkaisuja A 7, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  3. Alaranta H, Heikki H, Heliövaara M, Soukka A, Harju R (1994) Non-dynamometric trunk performance tests: reliability and normative data. Scand J Rehabil Med 26:211–215Google Scholar
  4. Bjurvald M (1994) Ways to fewer occupational injuries — development of Nordic ergonomic supervision (in Swedish with summary in English). Nord Ministerrddet TemaNord 514:1–64Google Scholar
  5. Andersson G, Bjurvall M, Bolinder E, Frykman G, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, et al. (1981) Model for evaluation of back injuries in accordance with industrial injury insurance (in Swedish with summary in English). Läkartidningen 78:2765–2767Google Scholar
  6. Andersson G, Bjurvall M, Bolinder E, Edshage S, Frykman G, Hagberg M, et al (1983) Model for evaluation of injuries to the cervical spine and shoulder joint in accordance with industrial injury insurance (in Swedish with summary in English). Läkartidningen 80:3186–3189Google Scholar
  7. Aoyagi Y, Shephard RJ (1992) Aging and muscle function. Sports Med 14:376–96Google Scholar
  8. Aronsson G, Astvik W, Kilbom Å, Nygård C-H, Petersson N, Torgén M (1994) Home-care workers in open home care services and in service apartment houses (in Swedish with summary in English). Arbete och Hälsa 32:1–109Google Scholar
  9. Asmussen E, Hebøll-Nielsen K (1961) Isometric muscle strength of adult men and women. Communications from the Testing and Observation Institute of the Danish National Association for Infantile Paralysis 11:1–43, Hellerup, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  10. Åstrand I (1960) Aerobic work capacity in men and women with special reference to age. Acta Physiol Scand 49 [Suppl 169]:11–25Google Scholar
  11. Åstrand I (1988) Physical demands in worklife. Scand J Work Environ Health 14 [Suppl 1]:10–13Google Scholar
  12. Bao S, Winkel J, Mathiassen S-E, Malmkvist A-K, Parenmark G (1993) Some effects of a “natural” intervention on physical work load in assembly work. Abstract of the Nordic Work Environment meeting, Visby, Sweden, 30/8-1/9 1993, pp 94. Available from The National Institute of Occupational Health, Solna, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  13. Bemben GM, Massey BH, Bemben DA, Misner JE, Boileau RA (1991) Isometric muscle force production as a function of age in healthy 20- to 74-yr-old men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 23:1302–1310Google Scholar
  14. Borg G (1970) Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med 2:92–98Google Scholar
  15. Borges O (1989) Isometric and isokinetic knee extension and flexion torque in men and women aged 20–70. Scand J Rehabil Med 21:45–53Google Scholar
  16. Bruce RA, Fisher LD, Cooper MN, Gey GO (1973) Separation of effects of cardiovascular disease and age on ventricular function with maximal exercise. Am J Cardiol 34:546–550Google Scholar
  17. Delin O, Grimby G, Svanborg A (1974) Work load in nursing aides. Scand J Rehabil Med 6:145–151Google Scholar
  18. Fordham M, Appenteng K, Goldsmith R (1978) The cost of work in medical nursing. Ergonomics 21:331–342Google Scholar
  19. Gerdle B, Brulin C, Elert J, Granlund B (1994) Factors interacting with perceived work-related complaints in the musculoskeletal system among home care service personnel. Scand J Rehabil Med 26:51–58Google Scholar
  20. Harms-Ringdahl K, Brodin H, Eklund L, Borg G (1983) Discomfort and pain from loaded passive joint structures. Scand J Rehabil Med 15:205–211Google Scholar
  21. Harrison MH, Brown GA, Belyavin AJ (1982) The ‘Oxylog’: an evaluation. Ergonomics 25:809–820Google Scholar
  22. Ilmarinen J (1992a) Job design for the aged with regard to decline in their maximal aerobic capacity. 1. Guidelines for the practitioner. Int J Ind Ergon 10:53–63Google Scholar
  23. Ilmarinen J (1992b) Job design for the aged with regard to decline in their maximal aerobic capacity. 2. The scientific basis for the guide. Int J Ind Ergon 10:65–77Google Scholar
  24. Ilmarinen J, Knauth P, Klimmer F, Rutenfranz J (1979) The applicability of the Edholm scale for activity studies in industry. Ergonomics 22:369–276Google Scholar
  25. Jacobsson L, Lindgärde F, Manthorpe R, Ohlsson K (1992) Effect of education, occupation and some lifestyle factors on common rheumatic complaints in a Swedish group aged 50–70 years. Ann Rheum Dis551:835–843Google Scholar
  26. Järvholm U, Palmerud G, Karlsson D, Herberts P, Kadefors R (1991) Intramuscular pressure and electromyography in four shoulder muscles. J Appl Orthop Res 9:609–619Google Scholar
  27. Jørgensen K (1985) Permissible loads based on energy expenditure measurements. Ergonomics 28:365–369Google Scholar
  28. Karlqvist L, Winkel J, Wiktorin C (1994) Direct measurements and systematic observations of physical workload among medical secretaries, furniture removers and male and female reference populations. Appl Ergon 25:319–326Google Scholar
  29. Kilbom Å (1971) Physical training with submaximal intensities in women — effect on adaptation to professional work. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 28:331–343Google Scholar
  30. Kilbom Å, Persson J (1981) Circulatory response to static muscle contractions in three different muscle groups. Clin Physiol 1:215–225Google Scholar
  31. Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom Å, Vinterberg H, Biering-Sørensen F, Andersson G, Jørgensen K (1987) Standardised Nordic questionnnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon 18:233–237Google Scholar
  32. Ljungberg A-S, Kilbom Å, Hägg GM (1989) Occupational lifting by nursing aides and warehouse workers. Ergonomics 32:59–78Google Scholar
  33. Louhevaara V, Ilmarinen J, Oja P (1985) Comparison of three field methods for measuring oxygen consumption. Ergonomics 28:463–470Google Scholar
  34. Malker B, Öhman B (1994) Occupational diseases and accidents 1992 (in Swedish with summary in English). Statistics Sweden, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  35. Mathiassen SE, Winkel J (1991) Quantifying variation in musculoskeletal load using exposure-vs-time data. Ergonomics 34:1455–1468Google Scholar
  36. Mittleman M, Maclure M, Tofler G, Sherwood J, Goldberg R, Muller J (1993) Triggering of acute myocardial infarction by heavy physical exertion. N Engl J Med 23:1677–1683Google Scholar
  37. Moens G, Dohogne T, Jacques P, Van Helshoecht P (1993) Back pain and its correlates among workers in family care. Occup Med 43:78–84Google Scholar
  38. Nygard C-H, Torgén M, Käll C, Kilbom Å (1993) Physical trainingintervention among elderly female home care workers. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health International Scientific Symposium on Aging and Work. Proceedings 4. 28–30 May, 1992, Haikko, Finland, pp 84–94. Available from The Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  39. Paffenberger R, Hale W, Brand R, Hyde R (1977) Work-energy level, personal characteristics, and fatal heart attack: a birth cohort effect. Am J Epidemiol 105:200–213Google Scholar
  40. Punnett L, Fine L, Keyserling WM, Herrin G, Chaffin DB (1991) Back disorders and nonneutral trunk postures of automobile assembly workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 17:337–346Google Scholar
  41. Rantanen T, Parkatti T, Heikkinen E (1992) Muscle strength according to level of physical exercise and educational background in middle-aged women in Finland. Eur J Appl Physiol 65:507–512Google Scholar
  42. Rantanen T, Sipila S, Suominen H (1993) Muscle strength and history of heavy manual work among elderly trained women and randomly chosen sample population. Eur J Appl Physiol 66:514–517Google Scholar
  43. Selin K, Winkel J, Stockholm MUSIC 1 study group (1994) Evaluation of two instruments for recording sitting and standing postures and number of foot steps. Appl Ergon 25:41–46Google Scholar
  44. Suurnäkki T, Nygård C-H, Ilmarinen J (1991) Stress and strain of elderly employees in municipal occupations. Scand J Work Environ Health 17 [Supp 1]:30–39Google Scholar
  45. Theorell T, Harms-Ringdahl K, Ahlberg-Hultén G, Westin B (1991) Psychosocial job factors and symptoms from the locomotor system a multicausal analysis. Scand J Rehabil Med 23:165–173Google Scholar
  46. Thorslund M (1991) The increasing number of very old people will change the Swedish model of the welfare state. Soc Sci Med 32:455–464Google Scholar
  47. Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Eskilinen L, Järvinen E, Toikkanen J, Klockars M (1991) Prevalence and incidence rates of diseases and work ability in different work categories of municipal occupations. Scand J Work Environ Health 17 [Suppl 1]:67–74Google Scholar
  48. WHO World Health Organisation, Geneva (1993) Aging and working capacity. WHO Technical Report Series 835:1–49Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margareta Torgén
    • 1
  • Clas-Håkan Nygård
    • 2
  • Åsa Kilbom
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied PhysiologyNational Institute of Occupational HealthSolnaSweden
  2. 2.Department of Public HealthUniversity of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations