Advertisement

Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 103–142 | Cite as

“Two be or not two be”: Identity, predication and the Welsh copula

  • Laurie Zaring
Article

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baltin, Mark: 1990,The Syntactic Distinction between Specification and Predication, Ms., NYU.Google Scholar
  2. Bowers, John: 1993, ‘The Syntax of Predication’,Linguistic Inquiry 24, 591–656.Google Scholar
  3. Chierchia, Gennaro: 1994:Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds, PhD dissertation, Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  4. Chomsky, Noam: 1993, ‘A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory’, in Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.),The View from Building 20, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
  5. Chung, Sandra and James McCloskey: 1987, ‘Government, Barriers and Small Clauses in Modern Irish’,Linguistic Inquiry 18, 173–237.Google Scholar
  6. Couquaux, Daniel: 1981, ‘French Predication and Linguistic Theory’, in R. May and J. Koster (eds.),Levels of Syntactic Representation, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  7. Delfitto, Denis and Norbert Corver: 1995, ‘Feature Primitives and the Syntax of Specificity’,GLOW Newsletter 34, 18–19.Google Scholar
  8. Diesing, Molly: 1992,Indefinites, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  9. Dikken, Marcel den: 1995,Copulas, Ms., Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam/HIL.Google Scholar
  10. Doherty, Cathal: to appear, ‘Clausal Structure and the Modern Irish Copula’, To appear inNatural Language and Linguistic Theory.Google Scholar
  11. Gramadeg Cymraeg Cyfoes: 1976, Y Bontfaen Morgannwg: D. Brown a'i Feibion, Cyf.Google Scholar
  12. Guéron, Jacqueline: 1993, ‘Types syntaxiques et types sémantiques: la phrase copulative comme palimpseste’,Revue québécoise de linguistique 22, 77–115.Google Scholar
  13. Heggie, Lorie: 1988,The Syntax of Copular Structures, PhD dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  14. Heggie, Lorie: 1993, ‘The Range of Null Operators: Evidence from Clefting’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11, 45–84.Google Scholar
  15. Hendrick, Randall: 1988,Anaphora in Celtic and Universal Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  16. Hendrick, Randall: 1994, ‘The Brythonic Celtic Copula and Head Raising’, in David Lightfoot and Norbert Hornstein (eds.),Verb Movement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 163–188.Google Scholar
  17. Heycock, Caroline: 1991,Specificational Pseudoclefts and Predication, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the LSA, January 1991.Google Scholar
  18. Higgins, Roger: 1979,The Pseudocleft Construction in English, Garland, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Jacobson, Pauline: 1995, ‘On the Quantificational Force of English Free Relatives’, in Emond Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer and Barbara Partee (eds.),Cross-linguistic Quantification, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 451–486.Google Scholar
  20. Jones, Morgan David: 1976,A Guide to Correct Welsh, Gomer Press, Llandysul.Google Scholar
  21. Jones, Morris and Alan R. Thomas: 1977,The Welsh Language, University of Wales Press, Cardiff.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, T. Llew: 1985,Un Noson Dywyll, Gwasg Gomer, Llandysul.Google Scholar
  23. King, Gareth: 1993,Modern Welsh, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Lema, José: 1992,Distinguishing Copular and Aspectual Auxiliaries: Spanish SER and ESTAR, Paper presented at the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, University of Texas, El Paso, February 1992.Google Scholar
  25. Lloyd, J. Selwyn: 1983,Cysgod Rhyfel, Gwasg Gomer, Llandysul.Google Scholar
  26. McCloskey, James and Kenneth Hale: 1984, ‘On the Syntax of Person-Number Inflection in Modern Irish’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 487–533.Google Scholar
  27. Moro, Andrea: to appear,The Anomaly of Copular Sentences, University of Venice Working Papers, No. 8.Google Scholar
  28. Owen, Ivor: 1982,Y Ferch o Ballymoy a Storïau Eraill, Gwasg Gomer, Llandysul.Google Scholar
  29. Partee, Barbara: 1986a, ‘Ambiguous Pseudoclefts with UnambiguousBe’, in S. Berman, Jae-Woong Chae and J. McDonough (eds.),Proceedings of NELS 16, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, GLSA, pp. 354–366.Google Scholar
  30. Partee, Barbara: 1986b, ‘Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type-Shifting Principles’, in J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh and M. Stokhof (eds.),Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 115–143.Google Scholar
  31. Pesetsky, David: 1987, ‘WH-in-situ: Movement and Unselective Binding’, in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.),The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 98–129.Google Scholar
  32. Pollock, Jean-Yves: 1983, ‘Sur quelques propriétés des phrases copulatives en français’,Langue française 58, 89–125.Google Scholar
  33. Rapoport, Tova: 1987,Copular, Nominal and Small Clauses: A Study of Israeli Hebrew, PhD Dissertation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  34. Rothstein, Susan: 1985,The Syntactic Forms of Predication, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
  35. Rouveret, Alain: 1990, ‘X-bar Theory, Minimality and Barrierhood in Welsh’, in R. Hendrick (ed.),Syntax and Semantics 23. The Syntax of Modern Celtic Languages. Academic Press, Orlando.Google Scholar
  36. Rouveret, Alain: 1994,Bod in the Present Tense and in Other Tenses, Manuscript, Université Paris-8.Google Scholar
  37. Ruwet, Nicolas: 1975, ‘Les Phrases Copulatives’,Recherches Linguistiques, No. 3, Université de Paris-Vincennes, pp. 143–191. Reprinted in N. Ruwet: 1982,Grammaire des insultes et autres études. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  38. Sadler, Louisa: 1988,Welsh Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach, Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  39. Safir, Kenneth: 1985,Syntactic Chains, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  40. Sportiche, Dominique: 1995, ‘Clitic Constructions’, in Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring (eds.),Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 213–276.Google Scholar
  41. Sproat, Richard: 1985, ‘Welsh Syntax and VSO Structure’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3, 173–216.Google Scholar
  42. Thorne, David: 1993,A Comprehensive Welsh Grammar, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  43. Verhaar, J. W. M. (ed.): 1967,The Verb ‘be’ and its Synonyms, Vol. 1–5, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  44. Verheugd-Daatzelaar, Els: 1990, Subject Arguments and Predicate Nominals, Rodopi, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  45. Williams, Edwin: 1983, ‘Semantic vs. Syntactic Categories’,Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 423–446.Google Scholar
  46. Williams, Edwin: 1986, ‘A Reassignment of the Functions of LF’,Linguistic Inquiry 17, 265–299.Google Scholar
  47. Williams, Edwin: 1990, ‘Pseudoclefts and the Order of the Logic of English’,Linguistic Inquiry 21, 485–489.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurie Zaring
    • 1
  1. 1.DelawareUSA

Personalised recommendations