Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 65–92 | Cite as

The aspectual semantics of psychological verbs

  • Jan van Voorst
Article

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic Psychological Verb Aspectual Semantic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belletti, Adriana and Luigi Rizzi: 1988, ‘Psych-Verbs and O-Theory’,NLLT 6, 291–352.Google Scholar
  2. Bouchard, Denis 1991,From Conceptual Structure to Syntactic Structure; unpublished manuscript, Université du Québec à Montréal.Google Scholar
  3. Brinton, Laurel J.: 1987, ‘The Aspectual Nature of States and Habits’,Folia Linguistica 21, 195–215.Google Scholar
  4. Catlin, Jane-Carol and Jack Catlin: 1972, ‘Intentionality: A Source of Ambiguity in English?’Linguistic Inquiry 3, 505–508.Google Scholar
  5. Dik, Simon: 1975, ‘The Semantic Representation of Manner Adverbials’, in A. Kraak (ed.),Linguistics in the Netherlands 1972–1973, Van Gorcum, Amsterdam, pp. 96–121.Google Scholar
  6. Dowty, David: 1975, ‘The Stative in the Progressive and Other Essence/Accident Contrasts’,Linguistic Inquiry 6, 579–588.Google Scholar
  7. Dowty, David: 1979,Word Meaning and Montague Grammar; The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague's PTQ, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  8. Dowty, David: 1988, ‘On the Semantic Content of the Notion “Thematic Roles”’, in Gennaro Chierchia, Barbara Partee and Raymond Turner (eds.),Property, Types and Meaning, Volume II. Semantic Issues, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 69–131.Google Scholar
  9. Garey, Howard B.: 1957, ‘Verbal Aspect in French’,Language 33, 91–110.Google Scholar
  10. Grimshaw, Jane: 1990,Argument Structure, MIT Press, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  11. Kratzer, Angelika: 1990,Stage-level and Individual-level Predicates, unpublished manuscript; University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  12. Lee, David A.: 1973, ‘Stative and Case Grammar’,Foundations of Language 10, 545–568.Google Scholar
  13. Lakoff, George: 1970,Irregularity in Syntax, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  14. McCawley, James D.: 1975, ‘Lexicography and the Count-Mass Distinction’, inBerkeley Linguistics Society 1, 314–321; also in McCawley, James D.: 1979,Adverbs, Vowels, and Other Objects of Wonder, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 165–173.Google Scholar
  15. Mufwene, Salikoko S.: 1984a ‘The Count/Mass Distinction in the English Lexicon’, in D. Testen et al. (eds.),Papers on Lexical Semantics, Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago, pp. 200–222.Google Scholar
  16. Mufwene, Salikoko S.: 1984b,Stativity and the Progressive, Indiana Linguistic Club, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  17. Pesetsky, David: 1990,Experiencer Predicates and Universal Alignment Principles, unpublished manuscript, MIT, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  18. Pinker, Steven: 1989,Learnability and Cognition. The Acquisition of Argument Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  19. Postal, Paul: 1971,Cross-over Phenomena, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Pustejovsky, James: 1988,Event Semantic Structure; unpublished paper, Brandeis University, Waltham. Ruwet, Nicolas: 1972, ‘A propos d'une classe de verbes “psychologiques”’, in Théorie syntaxique et syntaxe du français, Editions du Seuil, Paris.Google Scholar
  21. Ryle, Gilbert: 1949,The Concept of Mind, 1973 edition, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  22. Starosta, Stanley: 1990, ‘Valency and Case in Computational Linguistics’,Machine Translation 5, 79–96.Google Scholar
  23. Tenny, Carol Lee: 1987,Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness, unpublished Phd. thesis, MIT, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  24. Tenny, Carol Lee: 1989,The Roles of Internal Arguments: Measuring Out Events, unpublished paper, MIT Centre for Cognitive Science, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  25. Van Valin, Robert D.: 1987, ‘The Unaccusative Hypothesis vs. Lexical Semantics: Syntactic vs. Semantic Approaches to Verb Classification’, in Joyce McDonough and Bernadette (eds.), Proceedings of Nels 17, University of Amherst, Amherst.Google Scholar
  26. Vendler, Zeno: 1967,Linguistics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  27. Vendler, Zeno: 1976, ‘Causal Relations’,The Journal of Philosophy 64, 704–713.Google Scholar
  28. Verkuyl, Henk J.: 1972,On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  29. Verkuyl, Henk, J.: 1989, ‘Aspectual Classes and Aspectual Composition’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 39–94.Google Scholar
  30. Vet, Co: 1980, Temps et adverbes de temps en français contemporain. Essai de sémantique formelle, Librairie Droz, Genève.Google Scholar
  31. van Voorst, Jan G.: 1986,Event Structure, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
  32. van Voorst, Jan G.: 1988,Event Structure, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  33. Zwicky, Arnold M. and Jerrold M. Sadock: 1975, ‘Ambiguity Tests and How to Fail Them’, in John P. Kimball (ed.),Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 4, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan van Voorst
    • 1
  1. 1.Université du Québec à Montréal MontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations