Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 117–149 | Cite as

Wh-questions and focus

  • Nomi Erteschik-Shir


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bach, E.: 1971, ‘Questions’,Linguistic Inquiry 2, 153–166.Google Scholar
  2. Bechhoffer, R.: 1976, ‘Reduction in Conjoined Wh-Questions’,Harvard Studies in Syntax and Semantics 2, 68–120.Google Scholar
  3. Bechhoffer, R.: 1977, ‘A double Analysis of Reduced Wh-Questions’, in J. A. Kegl, D. Nash and A. Zaenen (eds.),Proceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
  4. Bolinger, D.: 1978, ‘Asking More Than One Thing at a Time’, in H. Hiź (ed.),Questions, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 87–106.Google Scholar
  5. Chafe, W. L.: 1970,Meaning and the Structure of Language, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  6. Chafe, W. L.: 1976, ‘Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics, and Point of View’, in C. N. Li (ed.),Subject and Topic, Academic Press, New York, pp. 27–55.Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, N.: 1982,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  8. Cole, P. (ed.): 1981,Radical Pragmatics, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Culicover, P. and M. Rochemont: 1983, ‘Stress and Focus in English’,Language 59.Google Scholar
  10. Dinsmore, J. D.: 1981,Pragmatics, Formal Theory and the Analysis of Presupposition, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
  11. Erteschik-Shir, N.: 1973,On the Nature of Island Constraints Ph.D. dissertation, M.I.T., Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
  12. Erteschik-Shir, N.: 1979, ‘Discourse Constraints on Dative Movement’, in T. Givon (ed.),Syntax and Semantics 12, (Discourse and Syntax), Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Erteschik-Shir, N.: 1981, ‘On Extraction from Noun Phrases (picture noun phrases)', Annali della Scoula Normale Superiore di Pisa, special issue, Pisa, Italy.Google Scholar
  14. Erteschik-Shir, N. and S. Lappin: 1979, ‘Dominance and the Functional Explanation of Island Phenomena’,Theoretical Linguistics 6, 41–85.Google Scholar
  15. Erteschik-Shir, N. and S. Lappin: 1983, ‘Under Stress: A Functional Explanation of Sentence Stress’,Journal of Linguistics 19, 419–453.Google Scholar
  16. Erteschik-Shir, N. and L. Polanyi: (in preparation), ‘Sentence Topics in Discourse’.Google Scholar
  17. Givon, T.: 1982, ‘Logic vs. Pragmatics, with Human Language as the Referee: Toward an Empirically Viable Epistemology’,Journal of Pragmatics 6, 81–133.Google Scholar
  18. Gunter, R.: 1966, ‘On the Placement of Accent in Dialogue: A Feature of Context Grammar’,Journal of Linguistics 2, 159–179.Google Scholar
  19. Higginbotham, J. and R. May: 1981, ‘Questions, Quantifiers, and Crossing’,The Linguistic Review 1, 41–80.Google Scholar
  20. Hirschbühler, P.: 1978,The Syntax and Semantics of Wh-Constructions, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  21. Hiź, H.: 1978,Questions, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  22. Kartunnen, L.: 1977, ‘Syntax and Semantics of Questions’,Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3–44.Google Scholar
  23. Katz, J. J.: 1973, ‘On Defining Presupposition’,Linguistics Inquiry 4, 256–260.Google Scholar
  24. Keenan, E. L.: 1971, ‘Two Kinds of Presupposition in Natural Language’, in C. J. Fillmore and T. Langendoen (eds.),Studies in Linguistic Semantics, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Keenan, E. L. and R. D. Hull: 1973, ‘The Logical Presuppositions of Questions and Answers’, in J. S. Petöfi and D. Franck (eds.),Präsuppositionen in Philosophie und Linguistik, Athenäum, Frankfurt/M.Google Scholar
  26. Kemp, W.: 1977, ‘Noun Phrase Questions and the Question of Movement Rules’, in A. Beach, S. E. Fox and S. Philosoph (eds.),Papers from the Thirteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 198–212.Google Scholar
  27. Kempson, R. M.: 1975,Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics, Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 15, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  28. Kuno, S.: 1982, ‘The Focus of the Question and the Focus of the Answer’, inPapers from the Parasession on Nondeclarative Sentences from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
  29. Kuno, S. and J. Robinson: 1972, ‘Multiple WH-Questions’,Linguistic Inquiry 3, 463–487.Google Scholar
  30. Langacker, R. W.: 1974, ‘The Question of Q’,Foundations of Language 11, 1–37.Google Scholar
  31. Lasnik, H. and M. Saito: 1984, ‘On the Nature of Proper Government’,Linguistic Inquiry 15, 235–289.Google Scholar
  32. Manor, R.: 1979, ‘Answers and Other Reactions’, Talk at Bar Ilan.Google Scholar
  33. May, R.: 1983, ‘Logical Form as a Level of Representation’, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
  34. Mittwoch, A.: 1979, ‘Final Parentheticals with English Questions — Their Illocutionary Function and Grammar’,Journal of Pragmatics 3, 401–412.Google Scholar
  35. Pope, E. N.: 1975, Questions and Answers in English, Ph.D. dissertation, M.I.T., Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
  36. Prince, E. F.: 1978, ‘A Comparison of WH-Clefts andIt-Clefts in Discourse’,Language 54, 883–906.Google Scholar
  37. Prince, E. F.: 1978a, ‘On, the Function of Existential Presupposition in Discourse’, in D. Farkas, W. M. Jacobsen and K. W. Tordrys (eds.),Papers from the 14th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Club, pp. 362–376.Google Scholar
  38. Reinhart, T.: 1981, ‘Pragmatics and Linguistics: An Analysis of Sentence Topics’,Philosophica 27, 53–94.Google Scholar
  39. Rochemont, M. S.: 1978,A Theory of Stylistic Rules in English, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  40. Wachowicz, K.: 1974,On the Syntax and Semantics of Multiple Questions, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas.Google Scholar
  41. Wachowicz, K.: 1978, ‘O-Morpheme Hypothesis’, in H. Hiz (ed.),Questions, 154–164.Google Scholar
  42. Williams, E.: 1978, ‘Across the Board Rule Application’,Linguistic Inquiry 9, 31–43.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nomi Erteschik-Shir
    • 1
  1. 1.Ben Gurion University of the NegevBeer ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations