Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Electrical stimulation of human forearm extensor muscles as an indicator of handgrip fatigue and recovery

  • 118 Accesses

  • 19 Citations

Summary

A set-up for percutaneous electrical stimulation of the forearm extensor muscles and measurement of wrist extension force is described. The frequency-force relationship and pulse duration-force relationship are described together with an experimental protocol showing that brief electrical test stimulations do not produce fatigue. In another set of experiments carried out a few weeks later, the subjects performed handgrip contractions: protocol A at 25% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) continuously until exhaustion, protocol B at 25% MVC intermittent (contraction + relaxation = 10 + 2 s) until exhaustion, and protocol C at 25% MVC intermittent until half the time to exhaustion. In all experiments, brief electrical stimulations were used to test the degree of fatigue during and up to 24 h after the experiments. There were marked changes in the force during stimulation at 20 and 100 Hz and these changes did not correlate with the increase in intramuscular temperature. Low frequency fatigue persisted for at least 24 h after protocol A and 1 h after protocols B and C. The significance of this is discussed and it is suggested that low frequency fatigue could be used as a sensitive indicator of muscle dysfunction after low and medium intensity exercise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bigland-Ritchie B, Cafarelli E, Vollestad NK (1986) Fatigue of submaximal static contractions. Acta Physiol Scand 128 [Suppl 556]:137–148

  2. Björksten M, Jonsson B (1977) Endurance limit of force in longterm intermittent static contractions. Scand J Work Environ Health 3:23–27

  3. Borg J, Grimby L, Hannerz J (1983) The fatigue of voluntary contractions and the peripheral electrical propagation of single motor units in man. J Physiol 340:435–444

  4. Davies CTM, Mecrow IK, White MJ (1982) Contractile properties of the human triceps surae with some observations on the effects of temperature and exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 49:255–269

  5. Duchenne GB (1872) De l'Electrisation Localisée et de son Application a la Pathologie et a la Thérapeutique par Courants Induits et par Courants Galvaniques Interrompus et Continus. 3 iemme éd. Ballière, Paris

  6. Duchateau J, Hainut K (1985) Electrical and mechanical failures during sustained and intermittent contractions in humans. J Appl Physiol 58:942–947

  7. Edwards RHT, Hill DK, Jones DA, Merton PA (1977) Fatigue of long duration in human skeletal muscle after exercise. J Physiol 272:769–778

  8. Hagberg M (1981) Muscular endurance and surface electromyogram in isometric and dynamic exercise. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 51:1–7

  9. Hicks A, Fenton J, Garner S, McComas AJ (1989) M-wave potentiation during and after muscle activity. J Appl Physiol 66:2606–2610

  10. Hultman E, Sjöholm H, Jäderholm-Ek I, Krynicki J (1983) Evaluation of methods for electrical stimulation of human skeletal muscle in situ. Pflügers Arch 398:139–141

  11. Johnson MA, Polgar J, Weightman D, Appleton D (1973) Data on the distribution of fibre types in thirty-six human muscles — an autopsy study. J Neurol Sci 18:111–129

  12. Jones DA, Bigland-Ritchie B, Edwards RHT (1979) Excitation frequency and muscle fatigue: mechanical responses during voluntary and stimulated contractions. Exp Neurol 64:401–413

  13. Klein C, Cunningham DA, Paterson DH, Taylor AW (1988) Fatigue and recovery properties of young and elderly men. Eur J Appl Physiol 57:684–690

  14. Kroemer KHE (1989) Cumulative trauma disorders: their recognition and ergonomics measures to avoid them. Appl Ergon 20:274–280

  15. Kroon GW, Naeije M (1988) Recovery following exhaustive dynamic exercise in the human biceps muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol 58:228–232

  16. Kurppa K, Waris P, Rokkanen P (1979) Peritendinitis and tenosynovitis. A review. Scand J Work Environ Health 5 [Suppl 31]:19–24

  17. Lindström LR (1970) Technical report. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothemburg, Sweden

  18. Milerad E, Kilbom A (1985) Physiological and electromyographic response to repetitive handgrip exercise. Clin Physiol 5 [Suppl 4] p 134

  19. Mortimer JT, Magnusson R, Petersen I (1970) Conduction velocity in ischemic muscle: effect on EMG frequency spectrum. Am J Physiol 219:1324–1329

  20. Sandercock TG, Faulkner JA, Albers JW, Abbrecht PH (1985) Single motor unit and fiber action potentials during fatigue. J Appl Physiol 58:1073–1079

  21. Sjöholm H, Sahlin K, Edström L, Hultman E (1983) Quantitative estimation of anaerobic and oxidative energy metabolism and contraction characteristics in intact human skeletal muscle in response to electrical stimulation. Clin Physiol 3:227–239

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Sven Byström.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Byström, S., Kilbom, Å. Electrical stimulation of human forearm extensor muscles as an indicator of handgrip fatigue and recovery. Europ. J. Appl. Physiol. 62, 363–368 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00634974

Download citation

Key words

  • Low frequency fatigue
  • Electrical stimulation
  • Forearm
  • Handgrip