Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 87, Issue 3, pp 373–376 | Cite as

Lack of rapid monoterpene turnover in rooted plants: implications for theories of plant chemical defense

  • Charles A. Mihaliak
  • Jonathan Gershenzon
  • Rodney Croteau
Original Papers

Summary

Evidence for the rapid metabolic turnover of leaf monoterpenes is a significant component of theories regarding the evolution and metabolic cost of plant chemical defenses. We re-examined whether monoterpenes are continuously synthesized and lost in intact peppermint plants, and demonstrate that the rapid monoterpene turnover previously observed using detached stems does not occur in intact plants. The apparent artifactual nature of rapid monoterpene turnover in peppermint suggests that a re-evaluation of the rates of metabolic turnover of plant defenses is needed before accurate hypotheses regarding the cost of plant chemical defense can be proposed.

Key words

Metabolic turnover Monoterpene Chemical defense Resource availability hypothesis Peppermint 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amelunxen F (1964) Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an den Drüsenhaaren vonMentha piperita L. Planta Med 12:121–139Google Scholar
  2. Amelunxen F (1965) Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an den Drüsenschuppen vonMentha piperita L. Planta Med 13:457–473Google Scholar
  3. Barz W, Hoesel W (1975) Metabolism and degradation of phenolic compounds in plants In: Harborne JB, Mabry TJ, Mabry H (eds) The flavonoids. Part 2. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Breccia A, Badiello R (1967) The role of general metabolites in the biosynthesis of natural products. I. The terpene marrubiin. Z Naturforsch 22b:44–49Google Scholar
  5. Burbott AJ, Loomis WD (1969) Evidence for metabolic turnover of monoterpenes in peppermint. Plant Physiol 44:173–179Google Scholar
  6. Chew FS, Rodman JE (1979) Plant resources for chemical defense. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores: Their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York, pp 271–307Google Scholar
  7. Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230:895–899Google Scholar
  8. Croteau R (1988) Catabolism of monoterpenes in essential oil plants. In: Lawrence BM, Mookherjee BD, Willis BJ (eds) Flavors and fragrances: A world perspective. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, pp 65–84Google Scholar
  9. Croteau R, Burbott AJ, Loomis WD (1972) Biosynthesis of mono- and sesqui-terpenes in peppermint from glucose-14C and14CO2. Phytochemistry 11:2459–2467Google Scholar
  10. Croteau R, Felton M, Karp F, Kjonaas R (1981) Relationship of camphor biosynthesis to leaf development in sage (Salvia officinalis). Plant Physiol 67:820–824Google Scholar
  11. Daddona PE, Wright JL, Hutchinson CR (1976) Alkaloid catabolism and mobilization inCatharanthus roseus. Phytochemistry 15:941–945Google Scholar
  12. Fagerstrom T (1989) Anti-herbivore chemical defense in plants: A note on the concept of cost. Am Nat 133:281–287Google Scholar
  13. Feeny P (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defense. Rec Adv Phytochem 10:1–40Google Scholar
  14. Fox LR (1981) Defense and dynamics in plant-herbivore systems. Am Zool 21:853–864Google Scholar
  15. Gershenzon J, Maffei M, Croteau R (1989) Biochemical and histochemical localization of monoterpene biosynthesis in the glandular trichomes of spearmint (Mentha spicata). Plant Physiol 89:1351–1357Google Scholar
  16. Gulmon SL, Mooney HA (1986) Costs of defense and their effects on plant productivity. In: Givnish TJ (ed) On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 681–698Google Scholar
  17. Howe HF, Westley LC (1988) Ecological relationships of plants and animals. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Maarse H, Kepner RE (1970) Changes in composition of volatile terpenes in Douglas fir needles during maturation. J Agr Food Chem 18:1095–1101Google Scholar
  19. Mihaliak CA, Lincoln DE (1989) Changes in leaf mono- and sesquiterpene metabolism with nitrate availability and leaf age inHeterotheca subaxillaris. J Chem Ecol 15:1579–1588Google Scholar
  20. Nickerson GB, Likens ST (1966) Gas chromatographic evidence for the occurrence of hop oil components in beer. J Chromatog 21:1–5Google Scholar
  21. Rhoades DF (1979) Evolution of plant chemical defense against herbivores. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores: Their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York, pp 4–54Google Scholar
  22. Rhoades DF, Cates RG (1976) Toward a general theory of plant antiherbivore chemistry. Rec Adv Phytochem 10:168–213Google Scholar
  23. Seigler D, Price PW (1976) Secondary compounds in plants: Primary functions. Am Nat 110:101–105Google Scholar
  24. Sukhov GV (1958) The use of radiocarbon in the study of biosynthesis of terpenes. In: Extermann RC (ed) Radioisotopes in scientific research, vol. IV. Pergamon Press, London, pp 535–547Google Scholar
  25. Waller GR, Nowacki EK (1978) Alkaloid biology and metabolism in plants. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Whittaker RH, Feeny PP (1971) Allelochemics: Chemical interactions between species. Science 171:757–770Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles A. Mihaliak
    • 1
  • Jonathan Gershenzon
    • 1
  • Rodney Croteau
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Biological ChemistryWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations