Muscle strength and history of heavy manual work among elderly trained women and randomly chosen sample population

  • Taina Rantanen
  • Sarianna Sipilä
  • Harri Suominen


The association between a history of heavy work and muscle strength was studied among 51 physically active women aged 66–85 years trained in sports and 41 women aged 70–81 years selected randomly from the population register. Maximal isometric muscle strength of hand grip, arm flexion, leg extension and trunk flexion and extension were measured using specially constructed dynamometers. The capacity of the abdominal muscles was evaluated by means of a sit-up test. The study included an interview dealing with the subjects' histories of heavy manual employment. The mean histories of heavy work for the trained and untrained women were 24 and 36 years, respectively. The trained women showed significantly greater maximal isometric muscle strength and abdominal muscle capacity than the untrained women. Among the trained women there was no correlation between the amount of heavy work and muscle performance. Among the untrained women the amount of heavy work correlated positively with maximal isometric trunk extension strength. The results would suggest that among elderly women, whether physically active or not, a history of heavy work has no systematic association with muscle strength.

Key words

Isometric force Muscle performance Occupation Veteran sports Aging 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aniansson A, Grimby G, Rundgren Å (1980) Isometric and isokinetic strength in 70-year-old men and women. Scand J Rehabil Med 12:161–168Google Scholar
  2. Aro S, Räsänen L, Telama R (1985) Social class and changes in health related habits in Finland in 1973–1983. Scand J Soc Med 14:39–47Google Scholar
  3. Borkan GA, Norris AH (1980) Biological age in adulthood: comparison of active and inactive US males. Hum Biol 52:787–802Google Scholar
  4. Clement FJ (1974) Longitudinal and cross-sectional assessment in physical strength as related to sex, social class, and mental ability. J Gerontol 29:423–429Google Scholar
  5. Era P, Lyyra AL, Viitasalo JT, Heikkinen E (1992) Determinations of isometric muscle strength in men of different ages. Eur J Appl Phys 64:84–91Google Scholar
  6. Lundgren-Lindqvist B, Sperling L (1983) Functional studies in 79-year-olds. Upper extremity function. Scand J Rehabil Med 15:117–123Google Scholar
  7. Nygärd CH, Luopajärvi T, Suurnäkki T, Ilmarinen J (1988) Muscle strength and muscle endurance in middle-aged women and men associated to type, duration and intensity of muscular load at work. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 60:291–297Google Scholar
  8. Östlin P (1989) The ‘health-related selection effect’ on occupational morbidity rates. Scand J Soc Med 17:265–270Google Scholar
  9. Rantanen T, Parkatti T, Heikkinen E (1992) Muscle strength according to physical exercise and educational background in middle-aged women. Eur J Appl Phys 65:507–512Google Scholar
  10. Rikli R, Busch S (1986) Motor performance of women as a function of age and physical activity level. J Gerontol 41:645–649Google Scholar
  11. Sipilä S, Viitasalo J, Era P, Suominen H (1991) Muscle strength in male athletes aged 70–81 years and a population sample. Eur J Appl Phys 63:399–403Google Scholar
  12. Viitasalo J, Viljamaa K, Komi PV (1977) Dynamometers for measurements of isometric trunk and leg forces. Research Reports from the Department of Biology of Physical Activity 22. University of Jyväskylä, JyväskyläGoogle Scholar
  13. Viitasalo J, Era P, Leskinen AL, Heikkinen E (1985) Muscular strength and anthropometry in random samples of men aged 31–35, 51–55 and 71–75 years. Ergonomics 28:1563–1574Google Scholar
  14. Vuolle P, Telama R, Laakso L (1986) Physical activity in the lifestyle on Finnish adults. Scand J Sport Sci 8:105–115Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Taina Rantanen
    • 1
  • Sarianna Sipilä
    • 1
  • Harri Suominen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Health SciencesUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations