Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 261–302 | Cite as

Semantics and property theory

  • Gennaro Chierchia
  • Raymond Turner


Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic Property Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aczel, P.: 1980, ‘Frege Structures and the Notions of Proposition, Truth and Set’, in J. Baravise, J. Keisler and K. Kunen (eds.),The Kleene Symposium, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 31–59.Google Scholar
  2. Aczel, P.: 1986,Lectures on Non-Well Founded Sets, CSLI, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  3. Bach, E.: 1980, ‘In Defense of Passive’,Linguistics and Philosophy 3, 297–341.Google Scholar
  4. Bach, E.: 1983, ‘On the Relation between Word-grammar and Phrase-grammar’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 65–86.Google Scholar
  5. Baravise, J. and R. Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized Quantifiers in Natural Languages’,Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–220.Google Scholar
  6. Barwise, J. and J. Perry: 1983,Situation and Attitudes, MIT Press, Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
  7. Baravise, J. and J. Perry: 1985, ‘Shifting Situations and Shaken Attitudes’,Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 105–161.Google Scholar
  8. Bealer, G.: 1982,Quality and Concept, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Bennett, M.: 1976,Some Extensions of a Montague Fragment of English, IULC, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
  10. Boolos, G.: 1971, ‘The Iterative Conception of Set’,The Journal of Philosophy LXVM, 215–231.Google Scholar
  11. Burzio, L.: 1986,Italian Syntax. A Government and Binding Approach, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  12. Chierchia, G.: 1982, ‘Nominalization and Montague Grammar’,Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 303–354.Google Scholar
  13. Chierchia, G.: 1984,Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds, Ph. Diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  14. Chierchia, G.: 1985, ‘Formal Semantics and the Grammar of Predication’,Linguistic Inquiry 16, 417–443.Google Scholar
  15. Cocchiarella, N.: 1985, ‘Frege's Double Correlation Thesis and Quine's Set-Theories NF and ML’,Journal of Philosophical Logic,14, 1–39.Google Scholar
  16. Cooper, R.: 1983,Quantification and Syntactic Theory, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  17. Cresswell, M.: 1985,Structured Meanings, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dowty, D.: 1985, ‘On Recent Analyses of the Semantics of Control’,Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 1–41.Google Scholar
  19. Dowty, D., R. Wall and S. Peters: 1980,Introduction to Montague Semantics, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  20. Feferman, S.: 1984, ‘Towards Some Useful Type-free Theories 1’,Journal of Symbolic Logic 49, 75–111.Google Scholar
  21. Frege, G.: 1892, ‘Ueber Begriff and Gegenstand’,Vierteljahrschrift fur Wissenschaftliche Philosophie, XVI. Translated as “On Concept and Object” in P. Grice and M. Black (eds.),Translation from the Philosophical Writings of G. Frege, Oxford, 1952.Google Scholar
  22. Gazdar, G., E. Klein, G. Pullum and I. Sag: 1985,Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  23. Gilmore, P.: 1974, ‘The Consistency of Partial Set Theory without Extensionality’,Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, viii, part II, Providence, R.1., pp. 147–53.Google Scholar
  24. Gupta, A.: 1982, ‘Truth and Paradox’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 11, 1–60.Google Scholar
  25. Herzberger, H.: 1982, ‘Notes on Naive Semantics’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 11, 61–102.Google Scholar
  26. Higginbotham, J.: 1986, ‘Elucidations of Meaning’, ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  27. Jubien, M.: 1985, ‘First-order Property Theory’, ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  28. Keenan, E. and L. Faltz: 1985,Boolean Semantics for Natural Languages, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  29. Keenan, E. and J. Stavi: 1986, ‘A Semantic Characterization of Natural Language Determiners’,Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 253–326.Google Scholar
  30. Koster, J. and R. May: 1982, ‘On the Constituency of Infinitives’,Language 58, 116–143.Google Scholar
  31. Montague, R.: 1970, ‘Universal Grammar’,Theoria 36, 373–398.Google Scholar
  32. Parsons, T.: 1979, ‘Type Theory and Ordinary Language’, in M. Mithun and S. Davis (eds.),Linguistics, Philosophy and Montague Grammar, University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  33. Partee, B. and M. Rooth: 1983, ‘Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity’, in R. Bauerle, C. Schwartze and A. von Stechow (eds.),Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 361–383.Google Scholar
  34. Schmerling, S.: 1983, ‘Two Theories of Syntactic Categories’,Linguistics and Philosophy,6, 393–422.Google Scholar
  35. Shieber, S.: 1986,An Introduction to Unification-based Approaches to Grammar, CSLI, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  36. Stalnaker, R.: 1985,Inquiry, MIT Press, Boston Mass.Google Scholar
  37. Thomason, R.: 1980, ‘A Model Theory for Propositional Attitudes’,Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 47–70.Google Scholar
  38. Turner, R.: 1987a, ‘A Theory of Properties’,Journal of Symbolic Logic 52, 63–86.Google Scholar
  39. Turner, R.: 1987b, ‘Generalized Frege Structures’, ms., University of Essex, U.K.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gennaro Chierchia
    • 1
  • Raymond Turner
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Modern Languages and LinguisticsCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of EssexColchesterUK

Personalised recommendations