Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 14, Issue 5, pp 555–566 | Cite as

Remarks on the metaphysics of linguistics

  • James Higginbotham
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burge, T.: 1979, ‘Individualism and the Mental’, P. French et al. (eds.),Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 4, Studies in Metaphysics, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  2. Burge, T.: 1989, ‘Wherein is Language Social?’, A. George (ed.),Reflections on Chomsky, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 175–191.Google Scholar
  3. Chomsky, N.: 1986,Knowledge of Language, Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  4. George, A.: 1989, ‘How Not to Become Confused About Linguistics,’ A. George (ed.),Reflections on Chomsky, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 90–110.Google Scholar
  5. Higginbotham, J.: 1983, ‘Is Grammar Psychological?,’ in L. Cauman et al. (eds.),How Many Questions? Essays in Honor of Sidney Morgenbesser, Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, pp. 170–179.Google Scholar
  6. Katz, J.: 1981,Language and Other Abstract Objects, Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  7. Katz, J. (ed.): 1985,The Philosophy of Linguistics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, Editor's Introduction.Google Scholar
  8. Katz, J. and P. Postal: 1991, ‘Realism vs. Conceptualism in Linguistics’,Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 515–554 (this issue).Google Scholar
  9. Wright, C.: 1989, ‘Wittgenstein and Theoretical Linguistics,’ A. George (ed.),Reflections on Chomsky, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, p. 236.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Higginbotham
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Linguistics and PhilosophyMITCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations