Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 465–517 | Cite as

Elucidations of meaning*

  • James Higginbotham

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aoun, J.: 1982, ‘On the Logical Nature of the Binding Principles: Quantifier Lowering, Double Raisings of ‘There’ and the Notion ‘Empty Element‘‘NELS 12 Proceedings. Graduate Linguistics Students' Association, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, pp. 16–33.Google Scholar
  2. Barss, A.: 1986,Chains and Anaphoric Dependence: On Reconstruction and Its Implications, unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  3. Bealer, G.: 1982,Quality and Concept, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Bresnan, J.: 1982, ‘Control and Complementation’,Linguistic Inquiry 13, 343–434.Google Scholar
  5. Brody, M.: 1984, ‘On Contextual Definitions and the Role of Chains’,Linguistic Inquiry 15, 355–80.Google Scholar
  6. Brody, M.: 1985, ‘On the Complementary Distribution of Empty Categories’,Linguistic Inquiry 16, 505–46.Google Scholar
  7. Burge, T.: 1974, ‘Demonstrative Constructions, Reference, and Truth’,The Journal of Philosophy 71, 205–23.Google Scholar
  8. Burge, T.: 1978, ‘Translation and Self-Reference’, in F. Guenthner and M. Guenthner-Ratner (eds.),Meaning and Translation, New York University Press, New York, pp. 137–53.Google Scholar
  9. Burge, T.: 1986, ‘Intellectual Norms and Foundations of Mind’,The Journal of Philosophy 73, 697–720.Google Scholar
  10. Carnap, R.: 1947,Meaning and Necessity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  11. Chierchia, G.: 1984,Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  12. Chomsky, N.: 1972, ‘Deep Structure, Surface Structure, and Semantic Interpretation’, inStudies on Semantics in Generative Grammar, Mouton, The Hague, pp. 62–119.Google Scholar
  13. Chomsky, N.: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, Holland.Google Scholar
  14. Chomsky, N.: 1986a,Knowledge of Language, Praeger Publications, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Chomsky, N.: 1986b,Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  16. Cressweil, M.: 1985a,Adverbial Modification, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.Google Scholar
  17. Cresswell, M.: 1985b,Structured Meanings, Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  18. Croft, W.: 1984, ‘Issues in the Logical Form of Adverbs and Adjectives’, ms., Stanford University and SRI International.Google Scholar
  19. Davidson, D.: 1967, ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, in N. Rescher (ed.),The Logic of Decision and Action, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Reprinted in Davidson (1980), pp. 105–48.Google Scholar
  20. Davidson, D.: 1969, ‘On Saying That’, in D. Davidson and J. Hintikka (eds.),Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland. Reprinted in Davidson (1984), pp. 93–108.Google Scholar
  21. Davidson, D.: 1979, ‘Quotation’,Theory and Decision 11, reprinted in Davidson (1984), pp. 79–92.Google Scholar
  22. Davidson, D.: 1980,Essays on Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. Davidson, D.: 1984,Inquiries Into Truth and Interpretation, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  24. Dowty, D.: 1979,Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.Google Scholar
  25. Dowty, D.: 1985, ‘On Recent Analyses of the Semantics off Control’,Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 291–331.Google Scholar
  26. Dummett, M.: 1986, ‘A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs: Some Comments on Davidson and Hacking’, in E. LePore (ed.),Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 459–76.Google Scholar
  27. Ernst, T.: 1986, ‘Manner Adverbs and the Sentence/ Predicate Distinction’, ms., The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  28. Fillmore, C.: 1968, ‘The Case for Case’, in E. Bach and R. Harms (eds.),Universals in Linguistic Theory, Holt, Reinhart, and Winston, New York, pp. 1–88.Google Scholar
  29. Frege, G.: 1892, ‘On Sense and Reference’, in P. Geach and M. Black (eds.),Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1962, pp. 56–78.Google Scholar
  30. Fukui, N.: 1986,A Theory of Category Projection and Its Applications, unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachustts.Google Scholar
  31. Hale, K. and S. Keyser: 1985, ‘The View from the Middle’, ms., MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  32. Higginbotham, J.: 1983a, ‘The Logical Form of Perceptual Reports: An Extensional Alternative to Situation Semantics’,The Journal of Philosophy 80, 100–127.Google Scholar
  33. Higginbotham, J.: 1983b, ‘A Note on Phrase Markers’,Revue Quebecoise de Linguistique 13, 147–66. Also inMIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. VI.Google Scholar
  34. Higginbothgm, J.: 1985, ‘On Semantics’,Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–93.Google Scholar
  35. Higginbotham, J.: 1986, ‘Linguistic Theory and Davidson's Program in Semantics’, in E. LePore (ed.),Truth and Interprtation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 29–48.Google Scholar
  36. Higginbotham, J.: (1987), ‘The Autonomy of Syntax and Semantics’, in J. Garfield (ed.),Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural-Language Understanding, Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 119–31.Google Scholar
  37. Higgins, E.: 1985, ‘On Adverbial Modification’, ms., MIT.Google Scholar
  38. Huang, J.: 1984, ‘On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns’,Linguistic Inquiry 15, 531–74.Google Scholar
  39. Jackendoff, R.: 1985, ‘Believing and Intending: Two Sides of the Same Coin’,Linguistic Inquiry 16, 445–60.Google Scholar
  40. Johnson, K.: 1985,A Case for Movement, unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  41. Kaplan, D.: 1969, ‘Quantifying In’, in D. Davidson and J. Hintikka (eds.),Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 178–214.Google Scholar
  42. Katz, J.: 1986, ‘Why Intensionalists Need Not Be Fregeans’, in E. LePore (ed.),The Philosophy of Donald Davidson: Perspectives on Inquiries Into Truth and Interpretation, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 59–91.Google Scholar
  43. Kelley, J.: 1955,General Topology, Van Nostrand, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  44. LeBeaux, D.: 1984, ‘Anaphoric Binding and the Definition of PRO’,NELS 14 Proceedings, Graduate Linguistics Students' Association, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, pp. 253–74.Google Scholar
  45. Levin, B.: 1985, ‘Lexical Semantics in Review: An Introduction’, in B. Levin (ed.),Lexical Semantics in Review, MIT Lexicon Project Working Papers, 1, pp. 1–62.Google Scholar
  46. Lewis, D.: 1970, ‘General Semantics’,Synthese 22. Reprinted in Lewis (1983), pp. 189–232.Google Scholar
  47. Lewis, D.: 1974, ‘Tensions’, in M. Munitz and P. Unger ((eds.),Semantics and Philosophy, New York University Press, New York. Reprinted in Lewis (1983), pp. 250–260.Google Scholar
  48. Lewis, D.: 1975, ‘Adverbs of Quantification’, in E. Keenan (ed.),Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
  49. Lewis, D.: 1983,Philosophical Papers, Vol. I, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  50. May, R.: 1977,The Grammar of Quantification, unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  51. McCawley, J.: 1968, ‘Concerning the Base Component of a Transformational Grammar’,Foundations of Language 4, 243–69.Google Scholar
  52. McCawley, J.: 1981, ‘Parentheticals and Discontinuous Constituent Structure’,Linguistic Inquiry 13, 91–106.Google Scholar
  53. McCawley, J.: 1973, ‘Syntactic and Logical Arguments for Semantic Structures’, in O. Fujimura (ed.),Three Dimensions in Linguistic Theory. TEC Corp., Tokyo, Japan, pp. 259–376.Google Scholar
  54. McConnell-Ginet, S.: 1982, ‘Adverbs and Logical Form’,Language 58, 144–84.Google Scholar
  55. Montague, R.: 1970a, ‘Universal Grammar’, reprinted in Montague (1974), pp. 222–46.Google Scholar
  56. Montague, R.: 19706, ‘English as a Formal Language’, reprinted in Montague (1974), pp. 188–221.Google Scholar
  57. Montague, R.: 1974,Formal Philosophy, R. Thomason (ed.), New Haven, Yale University Press, Connecticut.Google Scholar
  58. Parsons, T.: 1985, ‘Underlying Events in the Logical Analysis of English’, in E. LePore and B. McLaughlin (eds.),Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 235–67.Google Scholar
  59. Partee, B.: 1973, ‘The Syntax and Semantics of Quotation’, in S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.),A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc., New York, pp. 410–18.Google Scholar
  60. Pesetsky, D.: 1982,Paths and Categories, unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  61. Quine, W. V.: 1960,Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  62. Quine, W. V.: 1977, ‘Intensions Revisited’,Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2. Reprinted in Quine,Theories and Things, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 113–133.Google Scholar
  63. Reinhart, T.: 1983,Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation, Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  64. Rizzi, L.: 1982, ‘On Chain Formation’, ms., MIT and Universite de Geneve.Google Scholar
  65. Roeper, T.: 1987, ‘Implicit Arguments and the Head-Complement Relation’,Linguistic Inquiry 18, 261–310.Google Scholar
  66. Rosenbaum, J.: 1967,The Grammar of English Complement Constructions, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  67. Schein, B.: 1985,Event Logic and the Interpretation of Plurals, unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  68. Sproat, R.: 1985,On Deriving the Lexicon, unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  69. Thomason, R. and R. Stalnaker: 1973, ‘A Semantic Theory of Adverbs’,Linguistic Inquiry 4, 195–220.Google Scholar
  70. Thomason, R.: 1984, ‘Some Issues Concerning the Interpretation of Gerundive and Derived Nominals’,Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 73–80.Google Scholar
  71. Vlach, F.: 1983, ‘On Situation Semantics for Perception’,Synthese 54, 129–52.Google Scholar
  72. Williams, E.: 1983, ‘Against Small Clauses’,Linguistic Inquiry 14, 287–308.Google Scholar
  73. Williams, E.: 1984, ‘There'-Insertion’,Linguistic Inquiry 15, 131–53.Google Scholar
  74. Williams, E.: 1986a, ‘A Reassignment of the Functions of LF’,Linguistic Inquiry 17, 265–99.Google Scholar
  75. Williams, E.: 1986, ‘Implicit Arguments, Binding Theory, and Control’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 151–80.Google Scholar
  76. Zubizarretta, M.-L.: 1982,On the Relationship of the Lexicon to Syntax, unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Higginbotham
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Linguistics and PhilosophyMITCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations