Advertisement

Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 465–517 | Cite as

Elucidations of meaning*

  • James Higginbotham
Article

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aoun, J.: 1982, ‘On the Logical Nature of the Binding Principles: Quantifier Lowering, Double Raisings of ‘There’ and the Notion ‘Empty Element‘‘NELS 12 Proceedings. Graduate Linguistics Students' Association, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, pp. 16–33.Google Scholar
  2. Barss, A.: 1986,Chains and Anaphoric Dependence: On Reconstruction and Its Implications, unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  3. Bealer, G.: 1982,Quality and Concept, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Bresnan, J.: 1982, ‘Control and Complementation’,Linguistic Inquiry 13, 343–434.Google Scholar
  5. Brody, M.: 1984, ‘On Contextual Definitions and the Role of Chains’,Linguistic Inquiry 15, 355–80.Google Scholar
  6. Brody, M.: 1985, ‘On the Complementary Distribution of Empty Categories’,Linguistic Inquiry 16, 505–46.Google Scholar
  7. Burge, T.: 1974, ‘Demonstrative Constructions, Reference, and Truth’,The Journal of Philosophy 71, 205–23.Google Scholar
  8. Burge, T.: 1978, ‘Translation and Self-Reference’, in F. Guenthner and M. Guenthner-Ratner (eds.),Meaning and Translation, New York University Press, New York, pp. 137–53.Google Scholar
  9. Burge, T.: 1986, ‘Intellectual Norms and Foundations of Mind’,The Journal of Philosophy 73, 697–720.Google Scholar
  10. Carnap, R.: 1947,Meaning and Necessity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  11. Chierchia, G.: 1984,Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  12. Chomsky, N.: 1972, ‘Deep Structure, Surface Structure, and Semantic Interpretation’, inStudies on Semantics in Generative Grammar, Mouton, The Hague, pp. 62–119.Google Scholar
  13. Chomsky, N.: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, Holland.Google Scholar
  14. Chomsky, N.: 1986a,Knowledge of Language, Praeger Publications, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Chomsky, N.: 1986b,Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  16. Cressweil, M.: 1985a,Adverbial Modification, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.Google Scholar
  17. Cresswell, M.: 1985b,Structured Meanings, Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  18. Croft, W.: 1984, ‘Issues in the Logical Form of Adverbs and Adjectives’, ms., Stanford University and SRI International.Google Scholar
  19. Davidson, D.: 1967, ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, in N. Rescher (ed.),The Logic of Decision and Action, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Reprinted in Davidson (1980), pp. 105–48.Google Scholar
  20. Davidson, D.: 1969, ‘On Saying That’, in D. Davidson and J. Hintikka (eds.),Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland. Reprinted in Davidson (1984), pp. 93–108.Google Scholar
  21. Davidson, D.: 1979, ‘Quotation’,Theory and Decision 11, reprinted in Davidson (1984), pp. 79–92.Google Scholar
  22. Davidson, D.: 1980,Essays on Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. Davidson, D.: 1984,Inquiries Into Truth and Interpretation, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  24. Dowty, D.: 1979,Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.Google Scholar
  25. Dowty, D.: 1985, ‘On Recent Analyses of the Semantics off Control’,Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 291–331.Google Scholar
  26. Dummett, M.: 1986, ‘A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs: Some Comments on Davidson and Hacking’, in E. LePore (ed.),Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 459–76.Google Scholar
  27. Ernst, T.: 1986, ‘Manner Adverbs and the Sentence/ Predicate Distinction’, ms., The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  28. Fillmore, C.: 1968, ‘The Case for Case’, in E. Bach and R. Harms (eds.),Universals in Linguistic Theory, Holt, Reinhart, and Winston, New York, pp. 1–88.Google Scholar
  29. Frege, G.: 1892, ‘On Sense and Reference’, in P. Geach and M. Black (eds.),Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1962, pp. 56–78.Google Scholar
  30. Fukui, N.: 1986,A Theory of Category Projection and Its Applications, unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachustts.Google Scholar
  31. Hale, K. and S. Keyser: 1985, ‘The View from the Middle’, ms., MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  32. Higginbotham, J.: 1983a, ‘The Logical Form of Perceptual Reports: An Extensional Alternative to Situation Semantics’,The Journal of Philosophy 80, 100–127.Google Scholar
  33. Higginbotham, J.: 1983b, ‘A Note on Phrase Markers’,Revue Quebecoise de Linguistique 13, 147–66. Also inMIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. VI.Google Scholar
  34. Higginbothgm, J.: 1985, ‘On Semantics’,Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–93.Google Scholar
  35. Higginbotham, J.: 1986, ‘Linguistic Theory and Davidson's Program in Semantics’, in E. LePore (ed.),Truth and Interprtation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 29–48.Google Scholar
  36. Higginbotham, J.: (1987), ‘The Autonomy of Syntax and Semantics’, in J. Garfield (ed.),Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural-Language Understanding, Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 119–31.Google Scholar
  37. Higgins, E.: 1985, ‘On Adverbial Modification’, ms., MIT.Google Scholar
  38. Huang, J.: 1984, ‘On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns’,Linguistic Inquiry 15, 531–74.Google Scholar
  39. Jackendoff, R.: 1985, ‘Believing and Intending: Two Sides of the Same Coin’,Linguistic Inquiry 16, 445–60.Google Scholar
  40. Johnson, K.: 1985,A Case for Movement, unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  41. Kaplan, D.: 1969, ‘Quantifying In’, in D. Davidson and J. Hintikka (eds.),Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 178–214.Google Scholar
  42. Katz, J.: 1986, ‘Why Intensionalists Need Not Be Fregeans’, in E. LePore (ed.),The Philosophy of Donald Davidson: Perspectives on Inquiries Into Truth and Interpretation, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 59–91.Google Scholar
  43. Kelley, J.: 1955,General Topology, Van Nostrand, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  44. LeBeaux, D.: 1984, ‘Anaphoric Binding and the Definition of PRO’,NELS 14 Proceedings, Graduate Linguistics Students' Association, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, pp. 253–74.Google Scholar
  45. Levin, B.: 1985, ‘Lexical Semantics in Review: An Introduction’, in B. Levin (ed.),Lexical Semantics in Review, MIT Lexicon Project Working Papers, 1, pp. 1–62.Google Scholar
  46. Lewis, D.: 1970, ‘General Semantics’,Synthese 22. Reprinted in Lewis (1983), pp. 189–232.Google Scholar
  47. Lewis, D.: 1974, ‘Tensions’, in M. Munitz and P. Unger ((eds.),Semantics and Philosophy, New York University Press, New York. Reprinted in Lewis (1983), pp. 250–260.Google Scholar
  48. Lewis, D.: 1975, ‘Adverbs of Quantification’, in E. Keenan (ed.),Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
  49. Lewis, D.: 1983,Philosophical Papers, Vol. I, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  50. May, R.: 1977,The Grammar of Quantification, unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  51. McCawley, J.: 1968, ‘Concerning the Base Component of a Transformational Grammar’,Foundations of Language 4, 243–69.Google Scholar
  52. McCawley, J.: 1981, ‘Parentheticals and Discontinuous Constituent Structure’,Linguistic Inquiry 13, 91–106.Google Scholar
  53. McCawley, J.: 1973, ‘Syntactic and Logical Arguments for Semantic Structures’, in O. Fujimura (ed.),Three Dimensions in Linguistic Theory. TEC Corp., Tokyo, Japan, pp. 259–376.Google Scholar
  54. McConnell-Ginet, S.: 1982, ‘Adverbs and Logical Form’,Language 58, 144–84.Google Scholar
  55. Montague, R.: 1970a, ‘Universal Grammar’, reprinted in Montague (1974), pp. 222–46.Google Scholar
  56. Montague, R.: 19706, ‘English as a Formal Language’, reprinted in Montague (1974), pp. 188–221.Google Scholar
  57. Montague, R.: 1974,Formal Philosophy, R. Thomason (ed.), New Haven, Yale University Press, Connecticut.Google Scholar
  58. Parsons, T.: 1985, ‘Underlying Events in the Logical Analysis of English’, in E. LePore and B. McLaughlin (eds.),Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 235–67.Google Scholar
  59. Partee, B.: 1973, ‘The Syntax and Semantics of Quotation’, in S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.),A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc., New York, pp. 410–18.Google Scholar
  60. Pesetsky, D.: 1982,Paths and Categories, unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  61. Quine, W. V.: 1960,Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  62. Quine, W. V.: 1977, ‘Intensions Revisited’,Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2. Reprinted in Quine,Theories and Things, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 113–133.Google Scholar
  63. Reinhart, T.: 1983,Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation, Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  64. Rizzi, L.: 1982, ‘On Chain Formation’, ms., MIT and Universite de Geneve.Google Scholar
  65. Roeper, T.: 1987, ‘Implicit Arguments and the Head-Complement Relation’,Linguistic Inquiry 18, 261–310.Google Scholar
  66. Rosenbaum, J.: 1967,The Grammar of English Complement Constructions, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  67. Schein, B.: 1985,Event Logic and the Interpretation of Plurals, unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  68. Sproat, R.: 1985,On Deriving the Lexicon, unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  69. Thomason, R. and R. Stalnaker: 1973, ‘A Semantic Theory of Adverbs’,Linguistic Inquiry 4, 195–220.Google Scholar
  70. Thomason, R.: 1984, ‘Some Issues Concerning the Interpretation of Gerundive and Derived Nominals’,Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 73–80.Google Scholar
  71. Vlach, F.: 1983, ‘On Situation Semantics for Perception’,Synthese 54, 129–52.Google Scholar
  72. Williams, E.: 1983, ‘Against Small Clauses’,Linguistic Inquiry 14, 287–308.Google Scholar
  73. Williams, E.: 1984, ‘There'-Insertion’,Linguistic Inquiry 15, 131–53.Google Scholar
  74. Williams, E.: 1986a, ‘A Reassignment of the Functions of LF’,Linguistic Inquiry 17, 265–99.Google Scholar
  75. Williams, E.: 1986, ‘Implicit Arguments, Binding Theory, and Control’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 151–80.Google Scholar
  76. Zubizarretta, M.-L.: 1982,On the Relationship of the Lexicon to Syntax, unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Higginbotham
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Linguistics and PhilosophyMITCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations